If people are expecting the Enterprise,throw them a curve ball, with a Connie Farragut with Lt. Kirk?? Changing that ship will p)$$ off the hardcore fans less?
The Farragut would be less controversial, but you know Trekkies. We'd shank a bitch over a line of dialogue from a TAS episode so this can only end in a bloodbath of Nerdrage.
Let's hope that they exhibit some restraint with that. (Unlike Abrams.)Weeeelllllll...I have heard the VFX dept has played with the size of the Enterprise. By how much, I don't know.
Nor do I. Or the front, or the profile for that matter.I don't like the rear of it personally.
The Farragut would be less controversial, but you know Trekkies. We'd shank a bitch over a line of dialogue from a TAS episode so this can only end in a bloodbath of Nerdrage.
And let's be honest, the Farragut disaster could be made into a pretty good DSC episode, couldn't it?
One must wonder -- will DSC jump the shark and go the route in season 2 of exploring such stories from TOS? The Farragut is certainly one. What others are possible?
With DISCO's special effects budget and bringing in a competent writing team, it could be an impressive story.And let's be honest, the Farragut disaster could be made into a pretty good DSC episode, couldn't it?
The only problem I have with the 2009 Enterprise is that it's ugly, not that it was changed.
"Jump the shark?" Isn't this what Prequels do is explore previously reference stories or events in a property?One must wonder -- will DSC jump the shark and go the route in season 2 of exploring such stories from TOS? The Farragut is certainly one. What others are possible?
Only if they dress Lorca up as The Fonz.One must wonder -- will DSC jump the shark...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.