Yeah, I'd rather just see them shift the focus over to other characters than recast the current ones.
However comics are not published at a one book every other year pace. And the movie audience is much largerIt happens in comics all the time. How many Spider-mans have there been?
However comics are not published at a one book every other year pace. And the movie audience is much larger
I would rather see Sebastian Stan take over as Captain America simply because the "Bucky as Captain America" story was far, far more interesting than the "Sam as Captain America" story was.
Why does that matter? The movies don't copy the comics stories verbatim, they tell their own stories in their own way, using the comics merely as seed material. A story that didn't work well in the comics can work much better onscreen (see Civil War). And Anthony Mackie is a far, far more interesting actor to me than Sebastian Stan. Even if the script of a Bucky-Cap movie were brilliant, I can't believe Stan could make it very interesting to watch. He's one of the dullest actors in the entire MCU, while Mackie is one of the most charismatic.
Was it?and of course GotG 1 was completely disconnected to the Avengers characters
Well, no more permanent than the versions they're replacing. They age too.In movies, with the actors eventually aging out of their roles, it'd make more sense to make legacy heroes permanent.
The question of "why does it matter if a story is more interesting" has to be about one of the dumbest one's I've heard in a while.
Incorporating Sharon Carter into AoS seems like kind of a no brainer, and there even were plans to bring her in at one point but Emily Van Camp was too busy with Revenge at the time.
Perhaps, but she really hasn't had much to work with so far. I haven't seen her in anything else, so I can't judge there, but her role as Sharon has been pretty limited.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.