• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    185
I hope that's true, a Namor movie would be cool. If they make one, I hope they have at least have part of it in WWII. Namor taking down a Nazi Sub would be cool. I also wonder if they could use the original Human Torch. Maybe if they just call him by his adopted name (Jim Hammond)? I know in the comics they just changed his powers so he's radioactive instead of fire based, maybe they could do that to make him different enough from the FF character (maybe in the MCU he's an android made during research into radioactivity/the atomic bomb). There was an easter egg with him in the first Captain America movie, so it might be possible.
What was the Easter egg?
 
What was the Easter egg?
He's at the Worlds Fair Steve and Bucky go to.
human-torch-in-captain-america.jpg
 
Freeform has picked up New Warrirors, Marvel's first half-hour comedy series. Scrubs writer and Cougar Town Kevin Bielgel is close to signing on as showrunner for the series, which will feature fan favorite character Squirrel Girl. The IGN article doesn't specifically say that it will be in the MCU, but they do reference the Avengers in the official description, and so far (almost?) everything Marvel Studios has done has been set in the MCU, so it's pretty likely that it will be.
 
If they get Squirrel Girl right, this could be awesome. I like what the article says about her confidence, her faith in people, and teaching them to believe in themselves, but what about her uncanny ability to fight crime using computer science?

Although it's hard for me to imagine a Squirrel Girl story without hilarious text captions at the bottom of almost every page. Also, they'd better license the rights to the Spider-Man cartoon theme song that coincidentally has the exact same melody as Squirrel Girl's theme song and similar lyrics too, because it would be a shame to have Squirrel Girl without her theme song.
 
Freeform has picked up New Warrirors, Marvel's first half-hour comedy series. Scrubs writer and Cougar Town Kevin Bielgel is close to signing on as showrunner for the series, which will feature fan favorite character Squirrel Girl. The IGN article doesn't specifically say that it will be in the MCU, but they do reference the Avengers in the official description, and so far (almost?) everything Marvel Studios has done has been set in the MCU, so it's pretty likely that it will be.

So, they're stealing the New Warriors name for a show to star a character that was ruined by her latest solo comic run (which this will probably take stuff from),and all for a comedy on a channel known for predominately lame YA shows? Yeah, I'm betting this will just end up being Marvel's version of Powerless (different premise/style obviously, but similar in being a complete failure as a comedy and a property connected to the comics). At least DC's show didn't steal the name of a (fairly interesting) superhero team.
 
We haven't heard anything official but I'm sure they're involved. Marketing just isn't ready to release that information. I wouldn't sweat that yet.
 
There were just reports this week about Chris Evans that mentioned that his filming schedule for Infinity War was more than a month later than some of the other actors.

Also, there is no longer a movie called Infinity War Part 1.
 
Avengers: Infinity War.

...Because there is no part 2. That will be a different film, not a second part of this one.
 
Avengers: Infinity War.

...Because there is no part 2. That will be a different film, not a second part of this one.

It's the same thing Warner Bros. did with their two Justice League films -- announced them as "Part 1" and "Part 2" and then dropped those. I think the use of those working titles had more to do with production logistics than anything else -- they were announced before the films were even plotted or written, when they were just slots on the development schedule, so I figure the studio slated and budgeted them as 2-part films because they would be sharing the same production crew and resources and be shot back-to-back. Once they actually got around to plotting, writing, and pre-producing those films, all that logistical stuff remained true, but they became more distinct storywise, so their titles were changed in response.
 
Avengers: Infinity War.

...Because there is no part 2. That will be a different film, not a second part of this one.

From what I gathered, it's still basicly a two-parter, but not like Deathly Hallows Part 1 & 2 for example, or Star Trek two-parters. The movies will be connected, but from what I gathered in interviews, when a part 2 is released a year later, a year will also have passed storywise.

I might be totally wrong here ofcourse, but this is from what I gathered from articles sofar.
 
I don't know if we can call it "basically a two-parter" when it's a separate story (particularly given the two films in between). At least, we don't know much for certain. What we do know for certain is it'll involve the same heroes and the same villain. That alone will make it much more interconnected than anything else we've seen. But it seems like one of those two parters where the second part is a radical change from the first. I'm trying to think of a good analogy. The only one coming to mind is in DS9, The Search pt. 1 and The Search pt. 2 are very different stories or maybe TNG's Chain of Command. But I also think it's very fair to say that we don't even have enough information for that.
 
I mean, with the whole continuity thing, you could call Avengers: Infinity War - Ironman part 7 (or does Homecoming make it 8).
 
Last edited:
I don't know if we can call it "basically a two-parter" when it's a separate story (particularly given the two films in between). At least, we don't know much for certain.

Like I said, the Part 1/2 labels for both Infinity War and Justice League were assigned when these were just slots in the production slate, before they even had scripts written. I take that to mean that they're 2-parters from a production standpoint, back-to-back shoots with the same cast and crew and so forth, which would be the case regardless of whether their scripts turned out to be two halves of a single story arc or two consecutive, linked story arcs. So we're talking about two different ways of defining parts of a whole, logistics-based vs. content-based. The fact that both studios did the exact same thing with their "2-part" epics is what makes me think it's not about specific story content so much as the more general logistics of the filmmaking process.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top