invest some, spend some on frivolous items, purchase a nice home. put a TOS style bridge in the basement..and live off my investments while I travel the planet helping others in a way that I'll determine at the time.
I always find it interesting when people say they'd retire or just travel if they get ownership of a massive fortune. If you are blessed with $100M that cash pile BECOMES your new job. Leaving it to others is asking for it to be siphoned away. Stuffing it into a savings account is basically giving your bank a low interest loan in perpetuity. They're going to earn a lot more than the minimus they're giving you.
Look at the lottery winners and pro athletes that squandered fortunes and died destitute.
Yeah. My other thought is that a lot of these posts are good answers to "what would you do with $1-2 million?". Traveling, gifts and starting a nice collection is a fair answer to that. $100 million+ is a whole different ballgame. I think a good way to think of the question is "what would you do if you were suddenly in charge of a $100 million business?".
As for my answer, it's quite simple: I'd buy a seat at the big boys table. A nine figure sum is a good seed/buy-in. You get an actual voice in policy, and you can use that to help *millions* of people. Though, I know a couple of people with roughly that level of wealth, and I can't say it's made them particularly good people. There's a lot of cognitive dissonance. They probably, deep down, think they're still middle-class. Then again, they might view themselves as nobility, above our plebeian concerns. It's hard to say, as you don't exactly have time to broach this kind of subject when you only see them ~ twice a year during their parties.
Anyway, point is maybe my dream is my own damnation. You can't be *that* rich and not have it corrupt you in some way.
Stuffing it into a savings account is basically giving your bank a low interest loan in perpetuity. They're going to earn a lot more than the minimus they're giving you.
Fnd the lotto with the fewest numbers you have guess, that pays normally ir is up passed $100 million, buy a shitload of tickets with possible combinations (excluding ones that have won before) and likely win and make the money back and then some. Repeat the process. One the pot is big enough, move up to games with more numbers you have to guess, with higher payouts.
And then enjoy being rich.
Fnd the lotto with the fewest numbers you have guess, that pays normally ir is up passed $100 million, buy a shitload of tickets with possible combinations (excluding ones that have won before) and likely win and make the money back and then some. Repeat the process. One the pot is big enough, move up to games with more numbers you have to guess, with higher payouts.
And then enjoy being rich.
Build a full scale replica of a Federation Runabout or the Millenium Falcon in my back yard (because I'm rich)
Lots of anonymous donations/acts of kindness to strangers.
Buy Diamond Select, Start making the Ships you guys really want.
I have highlighted your error of logic -- combinations of numbers that have won previously are no less likely to win again. Another problem is that if you spend $75 million to win a $100 million lottery and win but have to share the jackpot with another winner or winners, you are down at least $25 million.
Dodgy statistics aside, don't you have to pay income tax of 39.6% on lottery winnings in the US? Again, assume you spend $75 million to win $100 million and are taxed $39.6 million. Your winnings after tax are $60.4 million so you lose $14.6 million.Eh, still worth a shot. ...
Plus, at least in my state's lotto, they post passed winning numbers, so you can see how often, if ever in some combos, repeats happen. Statistically speaking, I'm probably in good shape.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.