Very hard, if you know as little about Star Trek as I.And how hard is it to spell "Abrams"?
Very hard, if you know as little about Star Trek as I.And how hard is it to spell "Abrams"?
Yes, I am. But it is only an example.Are you seriously equating a movie with eating poisoned food? "?
One man's poison is another man's peanut butter.Yes, there is no "poison" in the new movies. They are just fine.
Though I agree with you, that is still an opinion only.Yes, there is no "poison" in the new movies. They are just fine.
Kor
It's a bad example. Food is required to live. Movies, not so much. Movies are sugarcoated globs of fat. Not that far from "poison".Yes, I am. But it is only an example.
Though, Myk, would you rather have a bad movie or no movie?
Every Star Trek fan has their opinion. I respect yours. Now, I do not hate the new movies but I prefer the prime universe.It's a bad example. Food is required to live. Movies, not so much. Movies are sugarcoated globs of fat. Not that far from "poison".
I'm going with bad movie. Though the last two Trek films do not fall into that category for me.
But it won't plant butts in the theatre. And for all its flaws (and I agree they are many) that's exactly what Trek XI did.The prime one can still be expanded on.
I get my Prime fix by reading books.But it won't plant butts in the theatre. And for all its flaws (and I agree they are many) that's exactly what Trek XI did.
As do I.As do I.
I get my Prime fix by reading books.
As do I.
As do I.
Why not? The mass of viewers the studio wishes to attract won't know the difference; they don't care. They just want a good story and a wild ride.But [Prime] won't plant butts in the theatre.
I feel that there is a lot of misdirected hate aimed at the new movies that I just don't understand. I remember times, multiple times actually, that there was no trek, and perhaps even no possibilty of future Trek. I am very optimistic at the moment about the future of Star Trek and the direction that it is heading in. While many feel that thte Abrahmsverse is a little too "actiony" for their likes, it's still Star Trek. While would like to see a return to the classic Trek stories, and character/moral driven story lines that speak to societal issues and high brow story lines, I think some fans miss the point. Interest is interest, and I think that the thing that I fear most is that the fans like myself are getting older and there just won't be any interest in Star Trek in 20 to 30 years. There has got to be a financial incentive for the studios to make new movies and series, and you have to draw in a new fan base. Are there times when Star Trek has made some missteps with the movies or series? Absolutely! Would I take any of those back? Never.
I think I just wanted somewhere to vent, anyway. KIt's good to see a community like this that is passionate about Trek, rather than talking about how much the new movies suck. Thanks.
...whereas the latest two have abandoned that entirely and focused completely on the action.
I like Star Wars movies, and get along with Star Wars fans quite well.You know that rivalry between Star Trek and Star Wars fans?
All Star Wars fans? I'm not so sure.I like Star Wars movies, and get along with Star Wars fans quite well.
The "rivalry" is a pretense.
†
How is the Star Trek/Star Wars rivalry a fabrication?I like Star Wars movies, and get along with Star Wars fans quite well.
The "rivalry" is a fabrication. The only problem some of us have with the two Abrams trek's is we don't lie what was done with it, no hate is involved. Personally I love the costumes and the pre-title sequence of ST Eleven is fantastic.
I dislike the re-imagining of James Kirk, and the relationship between Spock and Uhura (I feel) was a mistake.
†
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.