Actually, yes. That is a great scene.You wanted a VO about "cataloging gaseous anomalies", while the captain drinks out of a Starfleet regulation teacup?
![]()
Actually, yes. That is a great scene.You wanted a VO about "cataloging gaseous anomalies", while the captain drinks out of a Starfleet regulation teacup?
![]()
You wanted a VO about "cataloging gaseous anomalies", while the captain drinks out of a Starfleet regulation teacup?
I think that's a weird point of view. Like saying that if there's no God then we might as well kill ourselves. Life without the supernatural is still rich and worth living.
What thrusters? And why would we be humorous or metaphorical? That is not literal!It was a misfired synapse.
It refers to the thought that Star Wars: The Force Awakens copies the plot points of Star Wars: A New Hope so closely that it could be considered a remake. Let's try to get those creative, associative, metaphorical, and humor-interpretive thinking synapses firing on all thrusters.
Literal and metaphorical have the opposite meaning.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Yes, and I responded to that:ETA: Now that I reread your post, I think you read me wrong. He was saying that emotions and feelings are just a series of electrical impulses. I was responding that if that is true, then what is the point of anything?
Even if there's no "point".I think that's a weird point of view. Like saying that if there's no God then we might as well kill ourselves. Life without the supernatural is still rich and worth living.
I was responding that if that is true, then what is the point of anything?
I suspect some of these confusions are caused by use of the ignore list, which can change the apparent context of a post.I'm a little stumped as to how HIjol can now appear to agree with eyeresist.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.