What is the correct way of carrying out the river manoeuvre?
Ie, without crash landing on the fuel cells.
Ie, without crash landing on the fuel cells.
What is the correct way of carrying out the river manoeuvre?
Ie, without crash landing on the fuel cells.
How the Federation economy works without money
(*sound of can of worms being opened*)
I don't know about that ... Sybok, apparently, had to convert everybody onboard. A full complement would've made this chore near-impossible. His hostages were only the excuse for a short-changed starship to answer the summons. Which, considering his intense, personal belief that The Great Barrier was only an illusion, wasn't even necessary. He could've just converted the captain of a merchant ship, or whatever ... one that was fully functional.I don't think Sybok especially needed a compromised starship. All he needed was a hostage.
I have wondered that for years.
Force Lightning from her fingertips is the only possible explanation.
I have wondered that for years.
Force Lightning from her fingertips is the only possible explanation.
Nah, she knows that lightning wouldn't hurt a Q.
She was just about to form a biotic barrier, obviously.
I think it will never be explained why Kruge killed Valkris when the tape had become widespread knowledge.
I think it will never be explained why Kruge killed Valkris when the tape had become widespread knowledge.
What?
My point was, sir, that Nimbus III and its diplomat rejects weren't essential to Sybok meeting He Who Has No Name - it was just for flare, for dramatic effect ... whimsy, on his part. And it never fails to get a laugh out of me when Sybok's on the phone with "Captain" Chekov and after he hear's the shots outside says to him, "do you realise what you've done? It wasn't bloodshed I wanted!!!" Probably should've planned for that, then. And this is the guy who Spock calls the most gifted intellect he's ever known ... HA!!!I think Nimbus III was established as being very rarely visited, because it was a worthless rock in the middle of the Neutral Zone. Based on the look of Paradise City, the place rarely received supplies. So the quickest way to get a ship to the planet was to take diplomatic hostages.
It's interesting to think about the Romulan representative's arrival on Nimbus III. If Sybok's plans had been a little more forward, it might have been a Romulan ship heading for the God planet.
It could also be argued (though I personally wouldn't buy it) that Sybok knew the Enterprise would be sent, and made his plan deliberately in order to reunite with Spock.
I don't know if Sybok had to convert everyone. As long as he had a few key hostages and control of the bridge, the ship was his. (And possibly his ability to "convert" could be passed on to his followers?) I don't say it's likely (given Our Heroes always take back the ship, unless the Plot says otherwise), but I do think it's possible.
I try not to imagine this. I suspect we would not have TNG or later 24th century Trek if it had.
You say that like it'd be a bad thing...
![]()
Geniuses in fiction are never actual geniuses, are they? A couple of examples:And it never fails to get a laugh out of me when Sybok's on the phone with "Captain" Chekov and after he hear's the shots outside says to him, "do you realise what you've done? It wasn't bloodshed I wanted!!!" Probably should've planned for that, then. And this is the guy who Spock calls the most gifted intellect he's ever known ... HA!!!
Like Lenin, he was biding his time in Switzerland, waiting for his train.He got kicked off Vulcan when he was a very young Man and by the time we meet him, of course, he's decrepit. So ... where did those intervening decades go? That's another unanswered mystery! Hell, if he'd stolen a shuttle on his own, he could've reached Shakaree, long before STAR TREK 5. Governments aren't the only source of warp capability, but he goes to Nimbus III to get Enterprise in on the act because ... it's in the script.
Was Q sincere in 'Q Who' when he offered to renounce his powers and join the crew? Was he banking on Picard saying no, and what the hell would he have done if Picard had answered 'yes'?
I think it will never be explained why Kruge killed Valkris when the tape had become widespread knowledge.
Was Q sincere in 'Q Who' when he offered to renounce his powers and join the crew? Was he banking on Picard saying no, and what the hell would he have done if Picard had answered 'yes'?
Q is rarely sincere about anything.
I think it will never be explained why Kruge killed Valkris when the tape had become widespread knowledge.
The tape was not widespread at that point. As far as we know, Valkris was the only Klingon who had seen it. Kruge killed her to keep his mission a secret, and so he could take credit for bringing Genesis to the Empire.
Typical.
If the spaceship Yonada is only a year from it's planned destination and it's obviously going at sublight speed. Wouldn't it already be just inside or just outside it's destination's star system?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.