In fact it does not exist in my world. Along with Superman IV The Quest for Peace.
Aaaaaaaagggghhhhhhhhh!!!! One of the most infamous Golan-Globus productions ever unleashed on American theaters!!!

In fact it does not exist in my world. Along with Superman IV The Quest for Peace.
A brand new bridge set was built from scratch for TFF. I'm not certain how its size compared to that of the set used in TMP-TVH.Questions: Is the TUC bridge set larger than the TMP/TFF set? It looks larger. Was it a redress of the Excelsior bridge?
However, as was mentioned upthread, the TUC set is actually the same set used in TFF, just redressed. It's redressed quite effectively, in my opinion, because you can believe its an entirely different bridge from the one we saw in TFF. As opposed to, say, the redressing of the Enterprise bridge for the Reliant or the Grissom where they are still obviously the same set. But it is, in fact, the same set, and thus is the same size.
And even though my viewpoint is in the minority, I still prefer the TFF version to the TUC version.
A brand new bridge set was built from scratch for TFF. I'm not certain how its size compared to that of the set used in TMP-TVH.Questions: Is the TUC bridge set larger than the TMP/TFF set? It looks larger. Was it a redress of the Excelsior bridge?
However, as was mentioned upthread, the TUC set is actually the same set used in TFF, just redressed. It's redressed quite effectively, in my opinion, because you can believe its an entirely different bridge from the one we saw in TFF. As opposed to, say, the redressing of the Enterprise bridge for the Reliant or the Grissom where they are still obviously the same set. But it is, in fact, the same set, and thus is the same size.
And even though my viewpoint is in the minority, I still prefer the TFF version to the TUC version.
I think the TUC bridge is wider. There seems to be more space between the turbolifts.
I think TUC is underrated by people who expect way too much from a Trek film.![]()
I can't express how much I despise Indy IV. It's the only film I've ever seen at the cinema where I left the theatre feeling angry.
In fact it does not exist in my world. Along with Superman IV The Quest for Peace.
I thought the Phantom Menace was a far better movie.
Don't any of these people have lives outside of Starfleet? I think I would have enjoyed seeing our characters return to a life outside of Starfleet rather than them flying into the sun, their fates somewhat uncertain.
That was one thing that I think made Star Trek III work: simply seeing the characters out of uniform, wearing normal clothes. It just gave a more palpable sense that these people do, in fact, have lives. I really wish that idea could have continued. Instead, we got nothing but uniforms, ship duty, and endless careers up until the end.
Yeah, me too.
Same here, although I still wish they'd retained the Star Trek V bridge. the one in VI was too drab and military looking.
If the TUC bridge is drab, what is the TMP bridge?
![]()
6. Spock's mind rape of Valeris remains my single most disliked scene in all of Trek. I understand his need for information but the way he forcefully restrains Valeris and extracts information from her is incredibly unpleasant. The fact that everyone stands there and watches makes it doubly repulsive. I would have preferred if Spock requested an empty room and the whole scene happened off-camera.
Don't any of these people have lives outside of Starfleet? I think I would have enjoyed seeing our characters return to a life outside of Starfleet rather than them flying into the sun, their fates somewhat uncertain.
That was one thing that I think made Star Trek III work: simply seeing the characters out of uniform, wearing normal clothes. It just gave a more palpable sense that these people do, in fact, have lives. I really wish that idea could have continued. Instead, we got nothing but uniforms, ship duty, and endless careers up until the end.
Don't any of these people have lives outside of Starfleet? I think I would have enjoyed seeing our characters return to a life outside of Starfleet rather than them flying into the sun, their fates somewhat uncertain.
That was one thing that I think made Star Trek III work: simply seeing the characters out of uniform, wearing normal clothes. It just gave a more palpable sense that these people do, in fact, have lives. I really wish that idea could have continued. Instead, we got nothing but uniforms, ship duty, and endless careers up until the end.
This is actually one of my favorite things about TFF. Seeing Kirk on the bridge wearing his "Go Climb a Rock!" T-shirt was such a bizarre little moment, but it made me smile.
I've grown to really dislike the way Star Trek has portrayed civilian clothing over the years. It was nice to see people in the future wearing jeans and T-shirts.
Of course this was Meyer's fine hand and his self indulgent tripe for his love of drama (He did do a Sherlock Holmes film before TWOK after all) and he had no Harve Bennett to reign him this time, but it just makes it look like earth has no history of it's own and everyone in the 23rd century is too stupid to understand this.
9. The last ten minutes of the movie, from the resolution at Khitomer to the signatures at the end does nothing for me. Yes, they've saved the universe one more time but I would have loved to see them return to Starfleet as heroes rather than be told to return to be decommissioned. Don't any of these people have lives outside of Starfleet? I think I would have enjoyed seeing our characters return to a life outside of Starfleet rather than them flying into the sun, their fates somewhat uncertain.
Of course this was Meyer's fine hand and his self indulgent tripe for his love of drama (He did do a Sherlock Holmes film before TWOK after all) and he had no Harve Bennett to reign him this time, but it just makes it look like earth has no history of it's own and everyone in the 23rd century is too stupid to understand this.
I think your points are a gross misreading of the film, honestly.
Shakespeare in the original Klingon could simply mean the first translations of the work. Which could be a century or more old at that point.
There are no Vulcans who study Earth history? Spock says it is a Vulcan proverb, not that the event that spawned it happened on Vulcan.
The relative in question could've actually been Sir Author Conan Doyle who wrote the Sherlock Holmes stories. He is human and Spock is half-human. So the possibility exists that he is a distant relative.
I guess it's true that one can come away with any meaning they chose when watching or reading something.
Funny you should draw that particular analogy. Here's Nicholas Meyer from the TUC commentary track:The first and most obvious is the Klingon use of Shakespeare. I find it hard to believe that an extremely closed and repressive society would be allowing its citizens, let alone its military leaders openly read from one of its primary enemy's best known authors. It would be like the Red Army officers reading and quoting passages from "Mein Kampf" during WWII.
Germans didn't actually claim that Shakespeare was German or wrote in German, but they do have a love for Shakespeare that is perhaps as strong as Britain's, and consider themselves to be the greatest nation of Shakespeare scholars. And I don't think the Allies stopped listening to Bach, Beethoven and Wagner because of the war. Britain and Germany still admired each others' culture, even when they were at war.When he says, Chang, that you have never heard Shakespeare until you have heard him in the original Klingon, he is paraphrasing the Germans, who during or just before World War II claimed Shakespeare as originally one of their own, and said that you have never heard Shakespeare until you have heard him in the original German.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.