Why Do We Demand Internal Consistency & Continuity in Star Trek?

[The Old Mixer]

I think that nuBSG was more about the journey than the destination.

 

[F. King Daniel]

I think that nuBSG was more about the journey than the destination.

That's what they say about Lost and every other show with a shitty ending

 

[The Old Mixer]

I liked the ending, too.

 

[F. King Daniel]

Each to their own

 

[MacLeod]

Or nuBSG. They don't find Earth until the second half of the last episode.

(**spoiler alert **)

They found Earth earlier than that but it was a radioactive wasteland.

 

[suarezguy]

I'm not sure how trivial it is. It is a big part of "The Neutral Zone". One of those clubs used to look down on 20th/21st century humanity.

I think that's often overstated, the crew especially Picard did look down on Ralph but, though they did feel a little perplexed by the other two 21st century survivors they didn't look down on them let alone act hostile to them.

 

[MAGolding]

I don't demand internal consistency and continuity in Star Trek. The lack of internal consistency and continuity in Star Trek has given me a lot to think about and discuss. Sometimes I don't know what I would do if Star Trek had more internal consistency and continuity.