I didn't think of that.
I'm thinking that Luke is the person who is standing on the balcony on the right side.
All we see is his arms and hands, the right one being robotic.
(and there is a Porg right below him)
Where's [insert character or ship name here]?
- Thread starter Lorcan Kelly
- Start date
I didn't think of that.
I'm thinking that Luke is the person who is standing on the balcony on the right side.
All we see is his arms and hands, the right one being robotic.
(and there is a Porg right below him)
Ooooh, him. For some reason I barely paused to look at him while scanning the image. I mean, there is A LOT to take in and process in the thing. Yeah, that's very likely Luke.
Bringing us back on topic... Can anyone find Crusher, Kim, Janeway or Waldo? 
"Come to Quark's, Quark's is fun ...""FREECLOUD. A fully-owned subsidiary of Quark's bar, grill, gambling establishment, and holosuite arcade."
Hmm... no.Bringing us back on topic... Can anyone find Crusher, Kim, Janeway or Waldo?
Bringing us back on topic... Can anyone find Crusher, Kim, Janeway or Waldo?
I just have found Waldo. He is with Urkel.....
I feel this should really be its own thread
Okay, so the moderation decided to put the threads together. Although I don't like such 'monster threads' and am a fan of smaller threads, I, of course, accept this decision. So my posting is just about some of the given arguments.
So, you don't see the difference between Crusher/Janeway on the one side and a character like Bashir on the other side?
In my case, the question about Janeway was 'triggered' by the given story in this 3 (now 4) episodes. Especially, it's the whole "Picard vs. admirality"-situation, that brought me to Janeway. A Crusher remembrance can be triggered in the second episode, where Picard received the same diagnosis (!) from a doctor, he knows from the Stargazer (!!), that he received from Crusher in TNG. In this scene, I also asked myself, why they didn't use Crusher in it. And when the picture of an admirality, that no longer represents the same values like Picard, is drawn, this picture also involves Janeway as a part of the admirality. In addition, Picard had a (more or less) friendly relationship to both.
So the questions about the whereabouts of these two episodes didn't just come out of nowhere. Of course, everybody can call out that XY is "needing to be addressed in PIC", yes. So, on a case-by-case-basis, the given arguments seems to be very important, didn't they? And I would claim, that the arguments for this are, in the case of Janeway or Crusher, stronger than e. g. in the case of Bashir (because there was no mention of Section 31 or any other storyline, he was related to) or Harry Kim (who never had any relationship to Picard in the episodes).
So, you don't see the difference between Crusher/Janeway on the one side and a character like Bashir on the other side?
In my case, the question about Janeway was 'triggered' by the given story in this 3 (now 4) episodes. Especially, it's the whole "Picard vs. admirality"-situation, that brought me to Janeway. A Crusher remembrance can be triggered in the second episode, where Picard received the same diagnosis (!) from a doctor, he knows from the Stargazer (!!), that he received from Crusher in TNG. In this scene, I also asked myself, why they didn't use Crusher in it. And when the picture of an admirality, that no longer represents the same values like Picard, is drawn, this picture also involves Janeway as a part of the admirality. In addition, Picard had a (more or less) friendly relationship to both.
So the questions about the whereabouts of these two episodes didn't just come out of nowhere. Of course, everybody can call out that XY is "needing to be addressed in PIC", yes. So, on a case-by-case-basis, the given arguments seems to be very important, didn't they? And I would claim, that the arguments for this are, in the case of Janeway or Crusher, stronger than e. g. in the case of Bashir (because there was no mention of Section 31 or any other storyline, he was related to) or Harry Kim (who never had any relationship to Picard in the episodes).
Here’s the thing: the show is called Star Trek: Picard. The story is about him. If there are ancillary characters that the writers want to put in the story, it’s because they are there to enhance the story about Picard. If Crusher isn’t integral to the story they’re trying to tell about Picard, we will not see her. Janeway is not integral to the story so we won’t see her either. I suppose they could have given her the part that went to Admiral Clancy, but then the focus becomes Janeway, not Picard. That’s not what they want to do.
In a pattern buffer with all the others who stood in Geordi's way of becoming Chief Engineer.
Janeway was an Admiral in nemesis. Could well be retired by now, maybe an instructor at the academy.
"Remember cadets, when faced with the choice to fly 20 years to the nearest wormhole to Bajor or 70 years through Borg territory, always chose the second choice. Ther might be coffee in those nebulas! Class dismissed!"
Assuming that Janeway is the same age as Kate Mulgrew, which is 64, then I doubt she'd be retired. She could have moved on to something else, perhaps some scientific endeavor, but 64 is too early to retire in the 23rd century.
Yes. Janeway and Seven alone know more about the Borg than Shelby. Not to mention Picard as well.
I'm wondering whatever became of Tomalak and Sela, if they ever got off of Romulus or were even on Romulus at the time of the supernova. For that matter what happened to the D’deridex and Valdore classes of Romulan Warbird ships?
Since Tomalak was played by Andreas Katsulas (of Babylon 5 fame) and he has sadly died in 2006, we won't be seeing him again.
Now Sela.... that's a different question
I personally wouldn't mind seeing her, but lots of folks here would rather gouge out their eyes..
Naiomi Wildman knows more about the Borg than Shelby
Judging by the rate at which she aged within Star Trek: Voyager itself, she is probably now one of Picard's esteemed peers, if she hasn't already surpassed him and died of old age.
Kor
Similar threads
- Poll
