I like your BF/AF short hands. I'm going to copy that aspect =D for my head cannon.I agree that they should have stuck to stardates. Starting with Wrath of Khan outright saying Trek was in the 23rd century, however, the whole point of stardates was removed and now Trek will be outdated at some point. They should have kept stardates and never mentioned the Earth year, per the original TOS producer intentions.
A better way to go might have been to just date years by the Founding of the Federation. TOS would have taken place 104 AF, while Enterprise took place -10 BF. Something like that. The Founding of the Federation would never have been tied to an Earth year and Trek would always have been our future.
My head canon is that there are no actual Earth years mentioned in Star Trek and Earth dates given actually are really stardates (or star years).
Thus, Star Trek can still be our future and World War 3, Cochrane's flight, and other stuff assigned real Earth dates were actually stardates. This redating system happened in the chaos of World War 3, and thus Star Trek can always be our future even when 2063 comes around here and no warp drive shows up. All references to 22nd, 23rd, and 24th centuries were adjusted as well to match some other historical event (Kahless' coronation, Surak's ascent to office, etc.).
In fact, CBS/Paramount should implement this retcon right now! They already opened the door by turning 2233.04 into a stardate in the Kelvin films.
I agree that they should have stuck to stardates. Starting with Wrath of Khan outright saying Trek was in the 23rd century, however, the whole point of stardates was removed and now Trek will be outdated at some point. They should have kept stardates and never mentioned the Earth year, per the original TOS producer intentions.
A better way to go might have been to just date years by the Founding of the Federation. TOS would have taken place 104 AF, while Enterprise took place -10 BF. Something like that. The Founding of the Federation would never have been tied to an Earth year and Trek would always have been our future.
*cuts to an Enterprise where everyone is hunched over and the ceiling is inches above their heads*To me, all the deleted scenes from the films and tv shows are canon, so long as they don't contradict footage from the final film (For example, Kirk had two death scenes, so the one where he got shot in the back is not canon). Star Trek Online is canon as well.
Also, there are some ammendments to visual canon in the Kelvin Universe and the Discovery era. For example, the Kelvinverse Enterprise is IMO much smaller than they say it is, being roughly 366 meters long instead of the established 725 meters. In the case of the Discovery ships, the Enterprise as seen in Discovery is the exact same size as the TOS ship, and not the official 442 meters with all other ships scaled down accordingly.
All Starfleet ships incorporate technology similar to Dr. Who's TARDIS.*cuts to an Enterprise where everyone is hunched over and the ceiling is inches above their heads*
McCOY: Damn Starfleet designers!
Honestly, that's my version of how holodecks work. It's the only explanation that doesn't give me a headache. After one early scene where someone throws snow at a holodeck wall, it always seems as if they're so real, you can't tell them from reality. So canon can bite me. Headcanon makes more sense and is way more entertaining.All Starfleet ships incorporate technology similar to Dr. Who's TARDIS.
What, you didn't know that? You never asked.![]()
I liked the look of the early Starships as seen in the encyclopaedias! I believe they were the first vessels Starfleet used rather than the NX-01 or whatever it was called and since it wasn't visible on Kirk's wall in TMP it never happened and is probably an alternate reality!
JB
I think that in the original (whatever "original" might mean in a context of multiple changes to the past) timeline the NX-01 did exist, only it was named Dauntless. The name, and possibly the design, changed due to the events in the film "First Contact".
I just pretend every show is in a different reality. That solves all continuity issues. 8DI liked the look of the early Starships as seen in the encyclopaedias! I believe they were the first vessels Starfleet used rather than the NX-01 or whatever it was called and since it wasn't visible on Kirk's wall in TMP it never happened and is probably an alternate reality!
JB
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.