• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What's in YOUR 'head canon'?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those three ship classes were the most versatile designs ever built. They were easily upgradable as new technologies came online. Other ships were more powerful or had better qualities, but they were either fragile or they were not flexible enough to accommodate multiple upgrades over the long term.

Kirk's Enterprise was around for years before Kirk took command over it (at least 10 years, and who knows if there was a Captain before Pike), and it was well into service (tough refitted) at the time Kirk was an old Admiral. Seems starships in this era simply did have a longer life-span. For the follow-up ship (the Excelsior class) it makes sense to be this long in service as well. Maybe they just built way more ships of that class, so much more were still in service 80+ years later.

The Oberth-class was a scientific vessel. It had shields only suitable to defend against natural phenomena (ion storms, nebula, ....), and wasn't in any way tactical useful. It's purely a vessel to transport people from one place in space to another to conduct experiments. That shit is durable. Like todays ferries that are 50+ years old and still in service, the Oberth class being around for that long is logical.

The only problem is the Miranda class. She looks like a contemporary of the Enterprise, and is actually even inferiour to her. Her being around this long makes no sense, the only reason is that they had a detailed CGI-model of her around, and used that to fill in their fleet shots with more variety. In my headcannon "it's simply another ship", like when they used the BoP to stand in for a big & new klingon starship on TNG, or when the D7 appeared once on ENT. They were all supposed to be different starships.

On a related note: In my headcanon, half the background ships in the large Dominion war scenes are actually smaller scaled vessel, not bigger than the Nova class. Doesn't make much sense to have a fleet of thousands of "capital ships only", and no small/medium sized ships.


The Enterprise refit in TMP was the result of a strategic arms treaty with the Klingons and/or Romulans that stipulated fleet size limits. The Enterprise refit was not "technically" an addition to the fleet size. This limitation was dissolved as part of the Khitomer Accords.

I like that idea. Other than that, I never really cared for the technical details of the refit. "It's a refit. It looks different" is really all I need in terms of explanation for the different look.

The Federation entered a pacifist mode in the early to mid 24th century. This mindset was a transition of thought and attitude. One example of the change was the reclassification /propaganda / philosophy that Starfleet was no longer viewed as a military organization despite all evidence to the contrary. This philosophy was abandoned during the Dominion War.

IMO Starfleet is some sort of "coastguard" type. So them not really being "the" military, but at the same time being used to defend the borders are true at the same time. They are essentially the organization "all things starship related". In my headcanon there is also a "true" military (the MACOs, and the various planetary [surface, air, water, deep sea] forces), but Starfleet is the primary organization using starships.

The declaration "not the military" comes from Starfleet being a descendand of something like NASA/ESA who picked up on defending Earth against asteroids, space phenomena and whale probes (and later with weapons against aliens, because of their experience), and not coming from something like Trumps "space force" that also does a little science on the side now...

The moneyless Federation is really just a lack of hard currency. By the 23rd century Federation currency was a form of Bitcoin. I'm willing to compromise and claim that humans in the 24th century do not use money. But only humans or human colonies, or Earth/Sol system. The Federation as a whole still uses a monetary economy.

Oh, the Federation DEFINITELY is active in trade! That's not even head-canon, that's canon. It's just that the society is a post-scarcity society for it's citizens. Everybody can have basically whatever he wants (food and clothing for lifetime, houses, vehicles, holidays....) that money becomes meaningless. I guess there's more something akin to a exchange market, where people can trade goods (like a house at the sea) that are scarce with other scarcities they currently don't need (like historical paintings, or a luxury boat), but without anything really having a "prize" tag. Basically like the super-rich today, just for everyone.

The value of currency that IS used in trading in the Federation is just SO BIG, it's completely seperated from the individuals - no human needs the wealth to buy an entire Galaxy-class starship for it's own, or vaccines and food for a whole population.
 
Kirk's Enterprise was around for years before Kirk took command over it (at least 10 years, and who knows if there was a Captain before Pike), and it was well into service (tough refitted) at the time Kirk was an old Admiral. Seems starships in this era simply did have a longer life-span. For the follow-up ship (the Excelsior class) it makes sense to be this long in service as well. Maybe they just built way more ships of that class, so much more were still in service 80+ years later.

Robert April was captain before Pike. Memory Alpha claims he commanded her from 2245-2250, but I can't find any actual time reference in the episode he appeared in, so they probably just tacked on a single 5 year mission ahead of Pike's service.
 
The Miranda class in my head cannon was built in very large numbers as the fleet expanded in the 2270s as a part of the growing cold war with the Klingons. Other ship classes were built in large numbers as well. Such as the Akula class destroyers Belknap class medium cruisers and Constitution II class heavy cruisers. However the Miranda was the only one versatile enough to fulfill a number of different roles.

Say hundreds of the ships were built while only a few dozen of the other cruiser classes are constructed and the same number of destroyers. The larger ships are going to be decommissioned/replaced while the smaller ships likewise will have a replacement vessel come along to replace them at some point. However due to their number the Miranda class is just to prolific to replace without massive cost. And so the ships are refit to serve different roles in the fleet.

Some ships become supply and transport vessels, such as the Lantree from an early next generation episode. Others serve as science ships or destroyers/frigates, medical ships, tugs, assault ships, whatever can be dreamed off. By the time of DS9 the class is mostly relegated to secondary roles within the fleet and has been replaced with newer and more capable classes. However with the Borg threat Starfleet recommissions or refits many of the class into destroyers to rapidly fill out the fleet in a war where the number of hulls is considered paramount over the capabilities of the ships themselves.

Many of these ships are still in service at the time of the Dominion war and are thus used to bolster the numbers of the fleet. One Miranda being generally the equal to a bug ship in a straight up fight.
 
10. Bridge consoles don't explode

11. Most starships go their entire service life ( 100+ years ) without meeting a Baddy of the Season.
 
Last edited:
Here's one of mine.

Why do the original series and Next Generation look so different? And why do the films of the original series have more of a resemblance to Next Generation?

V'ger wiped out a huge chunk of the Enterprise's five year mission.
 
Here's one of mine.

Why do the original series and Next Generation look so different? And why do the films of the original series have more of a resemblance to Next Generation?

V'ger wiped out a huge chunk of the Enterprise's five year mission.

TOS IS 2260s. TNG is 2360s.

Compare photos of 1919 to today...

If anything TNG looks more TOS era than it probably should.
 
In my Head Cannon is over 570 pages of a Multi-Show Universe set in the start of the 26th century.

My UFP / StarFleet has expanded alot and is at the cusp of becoming a significant power within the 4 quadrants of the Milkyway Galaxy along with sending exploration fleets to nearby Galaxy Clusters to establish exploration & trade routes to those Galaxies.
 
My head canon is that there are no actual Earth years mentioned in Star Trek and Earth dates given actually are really stardates (or star years).

Thus, Star Trek can still be our future and World War 3, Cochrane's flight, and other stuff assigned real Earth dates were actually stardates. This redating system happened in the chaos of World War 3, and thus Star Trek can always be our future even when 2063 comes around here and no warp drive shows up. All references to 22nd, 23rd, and 24th centuries were adjusted as well to match some other historical event (Kahless' coronation, Surak's ascent to office, etc.).

In fact, CBS/Paramount should implement this retcon right now! They already opened the door by turning 2233.04 into a stardate in the Kelvin films.
 
My head canon is that there are no actual Earth years mentioned in Star Trek and Earth dates given actually are really stardates (or star years).

Thus, Star Trek can still be our future and World War 3, Cochrane's flight, and other stuff assigned real Earth dates were actually stardates. This redating system happened in the chaos of World War 3, and thus Star Trek can always be our future even when 2063 comes around here and no warp drive shows up. All references to 22nd, 23rd, and 24th centuries were adjusted as well to match some other historical event (Kahless' coronation, Surak's ascent to office, etc.).

In fact, CBS/Paramount should implement this retcon right now! They already opened the door by turning 2233.04 into a stardate in the Kelvin films.

My head canon is that the dates in Star Trek are Earth dates and not stardates, but the characters use different dating systems at different times. Thus, for example, I think that the Eugenics wars in the mid 1990s according to "Space Seed" and the Third World War about 2053 in First Contact must be the same war with different dates in different dating systems, since each is said to be Earth's last world war.

See for example my post # 371 here: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/whe...-or-22nd-century.297786/page-19#post-12813321

And my post number 16 here: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/tho...imagined-modern-history.298340/#post-12812514
 
Last edited:
I would say that all "Earth dates" should be calculated from the very first invention of warp drive (not Zefram Cochrane's flight, but whichever known alien discovered it first). Thus centuries (22nd, 23rd, 24th) are thus counted from a significant Star Trek event.

This can just happen to coincide with 1 AD, or maybe even 2019 AD. Star Trek needs to always be our perpetual future, so Earth dates mentioned on the show that will inevitably be passed in the real world need to be retconned for Star Trek to stay relevant.

The chaos of World War 3 is a good excuse too. So many records were lost and the war lasted so long that Earth wasn't even sure what year it was in the aftermath anymore. They might not even be sure if that actually was the 3rd World War, since any records of wars after World War 2 were lost.
 
My head canon is that the stardate dating system works the way it was described in the 1967 Star Trek writers' guide.

Kor
 
What was that? You mean it's not the Kelvin Timeline stardate system? ;)

Stardates just give a futuristic flavor, and really can't be used to try to determine the "actual" date of the episode in relation to our time, or in relation to events in other episodes/movies. They were never meant to convey consistency across different episodes; only within a single episode as the digit at the end of the stardate increases. The original idea was that stardates would also take into account your physical location as well as relativistic effects, etc. So, depending on the circumstances, you might have to record your captain's log with a lower stardate than you did last week!

From the 1967 Star Trek writer's guide:
STARDATE
We invented "Stardate" to avoid continually mentioning Star Trek's century (actually, about two hundred years from now), and getting into arguments about whether this or that would have developed by then. Pick any combination of four numbers plus a percentage point, use it as your story's stardate. For example, 1313.5 is twelve o'clock noon of one day and 1314.5 would be noon of the next day. Each percentage point is roughly equivalent to one-tenth of one day. The progression of stardates in your script should remain constant but don't worry about whether or not there is a progression from other scripts. Stardates are a mathematical formula which varies depending on location in the galaxy, velocity of travel, and other factors, can vary widely from episode to episode.

Kor
 
Stardates just give a futuristic flavor, and really can't be used to try to determine the "actual" date of the episode in relation to our time, or in relation to events in other episodes/movies. They were never meant to convey consistency across different episodes; only within a single episode as the digit at the end of the stardate increases. The original idea was that stardates would also take into account your physical location as well as relativistic effects, etc. So, depending on the circumstances, you might have to record your captain's log with a lower stardate than you did last week!

From the 1967 Star Trek writer's guide:


Kor
I agree that they should have stuck to stardates. Starting with Wrath of Khan outright saying Trek was in the 23rd century, however, the whole point of stardates was removed and now Trek will be outdated at some point. They should have kept stardates and never mentioned the Earth year, per the original TOS producer intentions.

A better way to go might have been to just date years by the Founding of the Federation. TOS would have taken place 104 AF, while Enterprise took place -10 BF. Something like that. The Founding of the Federation would never have been tied to an Earth year and Trek would always have been our future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top