What is the ugliest ship in starfleet?

[Gojira]

Galaxy Class (Enterprise D) yuck!

 

[RyuRoots]

The original Constitution-class. Pretty easy decision.

You will rot in hell after God gets you for that.

Good thing I don't believe in imaginary friends, then.

On a more on-topic note, I'm not especially fond of the Daedalus, either.

 

[Captain Verata]

What's your opinion???

I said Yeager Class
but he was consistant to say steemrunner

No, you didn't, unless you are a dual of one of the other posters.

He is referring to his debate with his friend and answering your question. He said the Yeager and his friend said the Steamrunner.

 

[Gul Re'jal]

Oberth and Norway. Norway looks like sledge.

 

[Saito S]

Freedom class. Not even the "old toy ship" look of the TOS Constitution, or the incredible WTF-factor of the DS9 kitbashes, can top this thing for sheer

 

[Shatnertage]

^ That's pretty awful.

 

[Kirby]

Galaxy Class (Enterprise D) yuck!

This is the worst hero ship IMO. Really small nacelles, completely distorted saucer. This one has never done anything for me.

For all ships, probably the Constellation Class. Looks absolutely horrible.

 

[scotpens]

Freedom class. Not even the “old toy ship” look of the TOS Constitution, or the incredible WTF-factor of the DS9 kitbashes, can top this thing for sheer

“Old toy ship”?? Them’s fighting words!

Anyway, the Freedom class is just a TNG-era take on the single-nacelle Destroyer/Scout class from the old Franz Joseph Starfleet Technical Manual.

Galaxy Class (Enterprise D) yuck!

This is the worst hero ship IMO. Really small nacelles, completely distorted saucer. This one has never done anything for me.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: The Enterprise-D looks like a piece of alien furniture. If it didn’t have tiny windows all over it, how would you even know it was supposed to be a spaceship?

 

[Cyke101]

Freedom class. Not even the "old toy ship" look of the TOS Constitution, or the incredible WTF-factor of the DS9 kitbashes, can top this thing for sheer

I know the stats on the page are noncanonical and that they're not your creation, Saito , but I fail to see how the Freedom Class could punch it up to 9.2 if it was an older design AND it only had one nacelle. Anytime a single nacelle is knocked out on another ship, engine performance is drastically reduced (Voyager, Odyssey, etc).

The author of that page must have really tried his/her best to justify the time spent into make a 3-d model

 

[Paradon]

All of them are pretty ugly, with the exception of Voy and Defiant.... The Enterprise E and Defiant are my favorite.

 

[Jono]

The Oberth would be my pick followed by the Nova, though I think the alternate reality future refit Nova looks a lot better with the forward notch filled. The Delta Flyer is also very ugly.

Of the kitbashes, the Springfield, glad it only appeared as a wreck.

 

[6079SmithW]

Yeager, Daedalus, and the Peregrin fighter. Also, all the excelsior kitbashes for DS9.

 

[BlobVanDam]

Oh man, how can I forget the Excelsior? First time I saw that on screen, I literally let out a gasp of disgust. Disgust, I say!

 

[Gepard]

Ignoring kitbashes (which easily sweep the category), the two ugliest ships are:

The Norway class

And the runner-up, the Sabre class.

Blech.

 

[C.E. Evans]

So far, the general consensus seems to be that every Starfleet ship is ugly.

 

[Mr. Laser Beam]

The Daedalus and Olympic classes. Somehow those globular primary hulls do not look right.

Except on ships like these. Then they're cool.

 

[Bill Morris]

 

[Satyrquaze]

The Ambassador-class looks a bit bloated when compared to other ships that have carried the name Enterprise.

I do agree that Curry is pretty ugly.

 

[Kadratis]

Norway all the way.

 

[Green Shirt]

The Enterprise-C is pretty rough. Never cared much for the Excelsior Class either.