What is Star Trek Discovery's rewatchability?

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by Tuvix5675, Dec 30, 2018.

?

What is Star Trek Discovery's rewatchability

  1. I would rewatch the entire season more than once

    52.4%
  2. I would only rewatch the entire season once

    7.6%
  3. I would only rewatch select episodes, not the entire season

    18.1%
  4. I have no interest in rewatching any of it

    18.1%
  5. I haven't even season the entire season

    3.8%
  1. CorporalClegg

    CorporalClegg Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    Location:
    Land of Enchantment
    [​IMG]
     
    XCV330 and Vger23 like this.
  2. Reyman

    Reyman Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2017
    Voyager was the first Trek I watched and loved it, but it was only after having watched all the other Trek that I realized how bad some episodes were.
     
    Tuskin38 likes this.
  3. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Voyager wasn't the first series I watched, but it was the first one I saw all the way through, since I was only born in '91.

    Mind you since I was only a young'en I don't remember much of my original watchthrough.

    I have re-watched all of it since then.
     
  4. Amaris

    Amaris Fuzzy Logic Generator Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Location:
    United States
    The first season kind of depressed me, so I'll likely wait a few years before doing a season rewatch. Once the season ended, the show kind of became out of sight, out of mind. I'm looking forward to the second season, though, and maybe it will be more upbeat and optimistic. I'd like to find some truly rewatchable episodes in that one.
     
  5. MakeshiftPython

    MakeshiftPython Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Had you suggested in the early 2000s this is how fandom would change its attitude towards ENT, they'd think you were just Braga himself (and then tell you to die). Suggest the same will happen with DIS, same reaction. If anything, it's always the newest iteration of Trek that'll get the most scrutiny until the next one comes along. I had to explain in another forum that TNG had a backlash from the Trek fanbase, they didn't believe me until I posted newspaper clippings of TOS actors leading the charge with how they felt "betrayed", "only greed is driving this show", etc.
     
    SolarisOne, PiotrB and Greg Cox like this.
  6. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    This is my favourite article to share. I think there's a bigger source out there, but I can't find it right now.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. eschaton

    eschaton Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2017
    I mean it makes sense.

    Let's say a given Trek series happens to have three mediocre to shitty episodes in a row. If it's "historic Trek" it's not really that big of a deal so long as the series as a whole is good. However, if it's a new Trek series being actively produced, it means three weeks straight of "the sky is falling, Trek is dead, and these showrunners must be fired!"
     
    SolarisOne and Greg Cox like this.
  8. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    I skipped out on ENT, but I remember that when VOY was on. The episodes were so up-and-down that if you had three in a row that weren't great, you'd see reactions just like that. The complaints about DS9 were more of the "but it's on a space station!", "this violates Gene's vision!" or "they shifted focus away from Bajor!" varieties. But often (not always), you'd have a lot of the same people who were complaining about DS9 and VOY at the same time. So that's how we got the "Let's go back to TOS/TNG!" breed.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2019
    SolarisOne likes this.
  9. Greg Cox

    Greg Cox Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Location:
    Lancaster, PA
    About DS9: I still remember a Trekkie friend of mine insisting, "It's good, but it's not STAR TREK."
     
    SolarisOne and Lord Garth like this.
  10. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    Phil Farrand, who wrote the Nitpicker's Guides*, mentally called DS9, "Bajor: Terok Nor" instead of "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" during episodes that focused on the Bajorans and Cardassians to help him break the TOS/TNG Paradigm he had in his mind whenever he watched Star Trek.

    * They were all in good fun, for those not familiar with them. He'd note all the little goofs in each episode. There were four categories: 1) Plot Oversights, 2) Changed Premises, 3) Equipment Oddities, and 4) Continuity & Production Problems. He did two volumes for TNG (because TNG wasn't finished yet when the first book came out), one for TOS, one for DS9... and then Paramount clamped down on unauthorized books in 1998, so he had to stop.

    Another great book before the 1998 clamp-down was The Joy of Trek: How to Enhance Your Relationship With a Star Trek Fan, by Samuel Ramer. ;)
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2019
    SolarisOne and Amaris like this.
  11. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    I have TNG Volume 2 somewhere, I liked the cover.
     
    Lord Garth likes this.
  12. MakeshiftPython

    MakeshiftPython Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    The more they stay the same.
     
    SolarisOne, Greg Cox and Lord Garth like this.
  13. DaveyNY

    DaveyNY Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Location:
    Schenectady
    STARLOG had articles in several of its issues describing the backlash that TNG was receiving at the time.
    Having had a subscription, I was particularly interested each month in seeing how that was playing out.
    (I still have all 374 issues packed away around here somewhere)


    Forgot to add that I'm rewatching DISCOVERY for the third time starting today.
    Not binging it, just gonna watch a couple of episodes a day so it's all fresh in my head for the start of season 2 next Thursday.
    :cool:
     
  14. Vger23

    Vger23 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    New England
    The fans are always furious about something huh? How adorable.

    Seriously, something funny to do: go into the Kelvinverse forum on this site and read the postings from when the firs movie premiered.

    Well, that's disheartening. I always thought the "not real Star Trek" criticism was really original and unique. ;)
     
    SolarisOne and Lord Garth like this.
  15. Nyotarules

    Nyotarules Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Location:
    London
    I've re-watched it on Netflix, my favourite episode is the Harry Mudd one, despite the silly ending.
    Fans are fanatical, we we are not sane, hence the word origin.
     
    XCV330 and Lord Garth like this.
  16. XCV330

    XCV330 A Being of Pure Caffeine Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    jippers on a beach somewhere
    The Fonz is strong with Frakes, in that photo.
     
  17. DaveyNY

    DaveyNY Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Location:
    Schenectady
    My third viewing of "Context is for Kings" and I just now noticed the Cardassian Vole in Lorca's Lab.
    :techman:
     
  18. Agony_Boothb

    Agony_Boothb Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Location:
    previously Mickmike
    In fairness to Enterprise, I do think it improved after season 2. Voyager however, got worse after season 4.
     
  19. Awesome Possum

    Awesome Possum Verified Disney Princess Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Somewhere in time and space
    DIdn't Netflix release some list of the most popular Trek episodes and it was mostly episodes of Voyager?
     
  20. Cyrus

    Cyrus Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    But Enterprise did improve after season 2, drastically so.
     
    gblews and Awesome Possum like this.