I know. But they haven't evolved much.The Simpsons and Family Guy are still on.
I know. But they haven't evolved much.The Simpsons and Family Guy are still on.
Unless it's bloody obvious, like that was then.Unless the original writer wants to chime in, it is all open to interpretation. Being born in 1971, I can really only interpret the line through the world I grew up in.
Unless it's bloody obvious, like that was then.
Oh, please, it's a joke about whose going to wear the pants in the family after they're married (to use a contemporary colloquialism from the same era as the joke was written.)Obviously it isn’t as obvious as you want it to be or else folks wouldn’t have differing interpretations.
Unless it's bloody obvious, like that was then.
I see people still trying to judge a 1966 line of dialog by 2025 standards.
In 1966, "temporarily at least, I am still your superior officer" was a joke about wives casting off the submissive, demure guise used to "catch" their man, and becoming "the boss" of the house once they were married.
I grew up with the show and first saw it just a few years after the episode was made. It's not a "bloody obvious" joke. It can absolutely be taken more than one way. My sister and I discussed it when we were younger and she still shakes her head at it because of how she interprets the line.Oh, please, it's a joke about whose going to wear the pants in the family after they're married (to use a contemporary colloquialism from the same era as the joke was written.)
Really, fans will squabble over anything here.
It is indeed - a bloody obvious joke.And it's just as reasonable that it's a joke.
SureIt is indeed - a bloody obvious joke.![]()
I recall George Takei not being happy when they made Kelvin Sulu gay because that wasn't how the character was written and that wasn't how he played the character.I think I heard a clip from a radio interview once where a shock jock asked Jimmy Doohan about Kirk/Spock slash fiction. Jimmy hadn't known there was such a thing, and he wasn't happy about it. The idea made him a little angry.
People can be friends without it being sexual.It was a curiously forced idea as Kirk way too obviously was attracted to women (even if his reputation as a womanizer is vastly exaggerated) and not just any women but a specific type of blonde (Ariel Shaw, Ruth, Drusilla, Carol Marcus, etc). Men CAN be friends with other men without it being romantic or sexual.
What do you think about people "Shipping" Kirk and Spock?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.