Okay, here goes:^ If people are going to condescendingly ask how the Prequels could be improved, asking the opposite question is absolutely "fair game".
How could the Prequels be ruined? What would make them not good?
Okay, here goes:^ If people are going to condescendingly ask how the Prequels could be improved, asking the opposite question is absolutely "fair game".
This is a cold, hard, carved in stone fact of life. Why would anyone come at you for it?Return of the Jedi is the worst film of the Original Trilogy and isn't as good as Rogue One. Come at me, nerds.
Apologies in advance...and isn't as good as Rogue One. Come at me, nerds.
Sorry, ROTJ eeks it out by the space battle and Luke vs. Vader. Also, I get more emotional over the Ewoks dying than some of the nameless Rebels.Return of the Jedi is the worst film of the Original Trilogy and isn't as good as Rogue One. Come at me, nerds.
There really isn't, and the PT feels a bit lacking in set up as well. Like, they are two halves of a bridge that don't quite reach.I've always enjoyed Return of the Jedi, but there's not quite enough setup, especially in light of the Prequels, for Anakin/Vader's redemption, or for the part that both Luke and Leia play in it.
If there was no Padme then where would Luke and Leia have come from?No Padme,
Again, really? Why don't you just move on already.What are the ways that the Original Trilogy can be improved? It is not perfect. Not by a long shot.
That would require a lot of restructuring to scrap the character entirely, but I'd go with waiting to introduce her until Episode 2, and have her already wary about the Chancellor's increasing power and Anakin's trust in him. They go on the run (not on vacation) where they fall into a passionate affair in the heat of the moment and after she discovers his slaughter of the Sand People realizes she needs to get out of this situation but her allies (Organa, etc) encourage her to take advantage of his devotion to her to gather information on the developments among the Jedi and Palpatine. When she realizes she is pregnant he senses it and makes moves to run away together, but instead she rejects him about as gently as a bag of bricks (in an already tense moment) and in his rage he thinks he kills her. Combined with the Jedi being assholes, and the breakdown of his relationship with Obi-Wan, he feels like he has lost everything. So when it comes time for Palpatine to turn him, he is just looking to grasp on to anything to stay afloat. She recovers in secret after Obi-Wan finds her, she gives birth to the kids and lives to learn from Obi-Wan that Anakin has fallen to the Dark Side before insisting he take one of the children into hiding while she takes the other to Alderaan. The guilt of pushing him towards Palpatine rather than trying to save him crushes her.If there was no Padme then where would Luke and Leia have come from?
Actually, this is a much better suggestion than mine, Yeah, I should have thought for a second before I wrote "No Padme" I definitely would have cut her out of Ep. 1 entirely, not made her the Queen of Naboo or anything, more just a young, idealistic rising star Senator. The Queen of Naboo should have been an Episode One character only that was only there to give the Jedi something to protect, and inadvertently lead them to Anakin, I think Padme should have been from another planet all together.That would require a lot of restructuring to scrap the character entirely, but I'd go with waiting to introduce her until Episode 2, and have her already wary about the Chancellor's increasing power and Anakin's trust in him. They go on the run (not on vacation) where they fall into a passionate affair in the heat of the moment and after she discovers his slaughter of the Sand People realizes she needs to get out of this situation but her allies (Organa, etc) encourage her to take advantage of his devotion to her to gather information on the developments among the Jedi and Palpatine. When she realizes she is pregnant he senses it and makes moves to run away together, but instead she rejects him about as gently as a bag of bricks (in an already tense moment) and in his rage he thinks he kills her. Combined with the Jedi being assholes, and the breakdown of his relationship with Obi-Wan, he feels like he has lost everything. So when it comes time for Palpatine to turn him, he is just looking to grasp on to anything to stay afloat. She recovers in secret after Obi-Wan finds her, she gives birth to the kids and lives to learn from Obi-Wan that Anakin has fallen to the Dark Side before insisting he take one of the children into hiding while she takes the other to Alderaan. The guilt of pushing him towards Palpatine rather than trying to save him crushes her.
Honestly though, there are lots of ways the role of Padme could have been replaced with a much more compelling character/storyline.
Okay, here goes:
How could the Prequels be ruined? What would make them not good?
A vergence, you say?No Padme means that Luke and Leia would have had to have been conceived by the midichlorians as the will of the Force.
Or something.
Kor
Not necessarily.These suggestions for removing or changing Padme's role would make the Prequels WORSE, and smack of really bad fanfiction.
Some might argue that certain events that occur within the prequels already smack of really bad fanfiction.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.