• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Watching for the last time...

You're mixing up two separate things. Yes, the whole system is certainly called "warp propulsion."

But the individual pods that are situated away from the main hull and contain the propulsion hardware are nacelles.

The nacelles are part of the warp system. Each individual nacelle is not a "space warp propulsion." That's not even how the word "propulsion" is used.

Kor

You'll have an easier time passing a watermelon through your urinary tract.
 
Nope. Never had a last experience with a series. And I never saw any of the movies in theaters. Only Blue Ray/DVDs. Well, I watched TWoK in theaters but that was after I watched the DVD.
Well, since I have so little of Voyager, watching "Endgame" in the Borg Fan Collective (DVD) was my last experience so far. But I intent on watching more. The same is true for Enterprise with "In a Mirror, Darkly" except I am not sure I want to watch more of it (except what I already have in its fourth season and the various fan collectives).

@PhaserLightShow
Should say intend, not intent.

Nope. Never had a last experience with a series. And I never saw any of the movies in theaters. Only Blue Ray/DVDs. Well, I watched TWoK in theaters but that was after I watched the DVD.
Well, since I have so little of Voyager, watching "Endgame" in the Borg Fan Collective (DVD) was my last experience so far. But I intend on watching more. The same is true for Enterprise with "In a Mirror, Darkly" (in the Mirror Universe Fan Collective) except I am not sure I want to watch more of it (except what I already have in its fourth season and the various fan collectives).

@PhaserLightShow
 
If I know I never want to watch something again, I just don't watch it. I don't give it a ceremonial watch just cause.

Well, given that I spent around £1000 collecting those tapes over seven years, I figured getting one more watch out of them might just get me a smidge closer to comparing the whole misadventure to an expensive rental, rather than a total waste of money. I'll have watched them three times!
 
I wouldn't go out of my way to watch certain episodes but I can't say for certain I'll never watch something again.
 
I wouldn't go out of my way to watch certain episodes but I can't say for certain I'll never watch something again.

That's basically my attitude. I'm in no hurry to watch, say, INSURRECTION again, but if it shows up on cable one night when I'm in a mood for some Trek . . ..
 
I can say that there is Trek that I will not go out of my way to watch - Star Trek: The Motion Picture, Insurrection, Nemesis, "A Night In Sickbay" and various other crappy episodes here and there, from all of the series - but I often have various Trek on for "background noise" while I'm working on the computer. So there's none of it that I can really say I'm 100% DONE with.
 
Star Trek was a work in progress, and as the series progressed the words for tech had been defined but not embracing what those classic producers developed like for example: Space Warp Propulsions and retconning it to nacelles is not right.

'The nacelle is a housing, separate from the fuselage, that holds engines, fuel, or equipment on an aircraft.

You could probably substitute the word 'pod' or even 'housing'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
'The nacelle is a housing, separate from the fuselage, that holds engines, fuel, or equipment on an aircraft.

You could probably substitute the word 'pod' or even 'housing'.

You and the rest of us are probably pissing off Saint Gene by referring to nacelles in material prior to their first mention in TOS. :lol:
 
'The nacelle is a housing, separate from the fuselage, that holds engines, fuel, or equipment on an aircraft.

You could probably substitute the word 'pod' or even 'housing'.

This is a lost cause. :brickwall: :shrug:

You and the rest of us are probably pissing off Saint Gene by referring to nacelles in material prior to their first mention in TOS. :lol:

Yes, how dare we defy Star Trek canon and refer to those outboard engine things on WWII planes as nacelles! That was centuries before TOS!

Kor
 
'The nacelle is a housing, separate from the fuselage, that holds engines, fuel, or equipment on an aircraft.

You could probably substitute the word 'pod' or even 'housing'.
Yes. And I wish Enterprise walked lightly with it. Just as if it wasn't defined.
 
And you are wise to do so.

Oh, I'm well aware. I've seen everything of Star Trek at least once. There were some nice points to Enterprise and, regrettably, I accept it as canon. Not like there is a choice or that it's up to me.
 
Yes. And I wish Enterprise walked lightly with it. Just as if it wasn't defined.

Why? It isn't a term created for starships, it is a term we've already used for decades to describe outboard engines. Do you get this would up over dilithium being used in Enterprise?
 
Not everyone likes everything, not even when it comes to Star Trek, which let's face it is a broad church. When I was first into it, I religiously bought everything, books, videos, CDs the works. It's only later, following maturity, that I started to look on these things with a more critical eye, and found that some aspects of Star Trek I'm not particularly fond of. I've gradually upgraded my collection to disc from tape, but now I come to Star Trek Voyager, which I bought as it was released. And I find I have no desire to get the DVDs. But I have to get rid of the VHS tapes, I'm screaming for reclaimed storage space...

So this is my last run through of Star Trek Voyager. I've dug out the old VHS player, and I'll watch them then throw them away. And then never think of Voyager again.

Then again, I thought I'd never buy Star Trek Nemesis after watching it in the cinema, and then I wind up getting the Stardate Collection...

Have you had a last experience with a Trek franchise?
Well the picture on ST Voyager on Netflix is better than VHS, so you don't really have to buy the DVDs.
 
I can't envision there being any Trek that I could say 'this is the last time I'll be watching this'. There's much that I won't go out of my way for, but if it's on there's a pretty good chance I'll watch it - at least for a bit.
 
Yes. And I wish Enterprise walked lightly with it. Just as if it wasn't defined.

Why? It isn't a term created for starships, it is a term we've already used for decades to describe outboard engines. Do you get this would up over dilithium being used in Enterprise?

As Kor has rather graphically indicated, don't bother. She's inured to logic, in-universe examples refuting her "positions", and real world examples refuting her "positions", but instead prefers to wallow in her blind superiority, bitterness, and flip everyone off demeanor. Let her wallow.:shrug:
 
I'll probably never purposely watch any Voyager episodes ever again, and though I respect DS9 for being a quality production, there are only a handful of those that I would ever go out of my way to watch again.

As for the movies, my never-again list includes Insurrection, Into Darkness and maybe Nemesis.
 
While I haven't seen some Trek episodes in over a decade, I'll never say never. There's always the chance I might get a little Chef Riker nostalgia on my deathbed and call up TATV on the Netflux capacitor.

Also, did this thread title make anyone else think of Admiral Ozzel, or am I the only freak?
 
Oh, I'm well aware. I've seen everything of Star Trek at least once. There were some nice points to Enterprise and, regrettably, I accept it as canon. Not like there is a choice or that it's up to me.
Well, you always have a choice. It's not as if you have to see Enterprise or any of the bad Trek? It's why some Treks are accepted and many are not. It all depends if the material delivers what you see from Star Trek.
 
It's not something I'd given much thought to, but I doubt I will see Voyager or Enterprise again. I own neither series and Trek repeats are fairly rare here. I didn't enjoy either series particularly and hindsight only makes them seem more flawed. DS9 on the other hand, I recently bought on DVD and rewatched, and if anything I enjoyed it more this time around. Although the modern binge watching approach highlights tropes, reused shots and sound effects and repetitive plot elements with a clarify that weekly watching in the 90s did not!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top