One person's shit is another person's manure.And sometimes something is just shit, which might be lost on some people.
One person's shit is another person's manure.And sometimes something is just shit, which might be lost on some people.
David cgc is correct. The stones didn't have to go back to the exact same place and serve the exact same purpose as they did in the original timeline, they just had to go back to the exact time in which they were taken from to ensure the continuity of the new timeline.
Finally, an episode that didn't make me want to break my TV. It still wasn't funny, but we got actual plot development. Neighbors acting suspiciously, one woman getting ejected into the real world outside of the town which apparently is a real town based on the fact that it has a sign in the real world. This is more of what I expected from episode 1, sitcom stuff but with consistent "something isn't right" vibes throughout the episode. It does help that this form of sitcom is less awful then the 50s stuff, but it was having the weird reality stuff all through the episode that made me actually interested and kept my attention. This is what I wanted to see in the show, and we're finally getting it. I can put up with bad sitcom stuff if its just part of the mystery of the show and not the whole focus, and this was the first episode to start to get that right, in my opinion.
I'm not sure what their '80s inspirations are, most of the specific shows I've seen referenced have been the earlier shows like Bewitched and Dick Van Dyke, and newer stuff like The Office or Modern Family. I have seen some references to Full House, but I'm not sure if those were from the people involved with the show, or the writers from the sites I go to guessing about what we'll see.It might have been the setting? 70's sitcoms (Brady / Partridge) where never my thing.
Looking forward to hitting 80's territory. I don't know what they'll be based on. Can we have a Cheers episode?
Apparently, Kevin Feige didn't make the connection between Mary Kate and Ashley and Elizabeth in the context of sitcoms and what they were trying to accomplish with WandaVision until they were watching old episodes of Full House in the writers room.I loved how they shifted the aspect ratio at the end, with the picture slowly opening up, instead of just cutting from one to the other.
I'm not sure what their '80s inspirations are, most of the specific shows I've seen referenced have been the earlier shows like Bewitched and Dick Van Dyke, and newer stuff like The Office or Modern Family. I have seen some references to Full House, but I'm not sure if those were from the people involved with the show, or the writers from the sites I go to guessing about what we'll see.
I imagine that was a deliberate choice (or even a request on her part) so not to draw the obvious comparison.Anyway, what I really came in here to say was that I can't believe the show has Debra Jo Rupp in its supporting cast and they didn't include her in the episode set in the 70s.
All in the Family? Happy Days? Mary Tyler Moore? Taxi? WKRP?It might have been the setting? 70's sitcoms (Brady / Partridge) where never my thing.
That's an interesting idea, and would be a nice final episode twist. It seems pretty much a fact at this point that Wanda is controlling things, but there's always a chance someone has manipulated her into doing all of this.I think there's something much deeper than Wanda or Hydra or SWORD at play. Like Mephisto or Nightmare deep. After all, this is supposed to lead into the second Doctor Strange movie.
Uhm, would she have gotten any advice beyond “don’t shit your diapers and get a good sleep while your sister is shooting a scene instead of you”?Oh shit, I completely forgot about that. I wonder if she went to her sisters for any kind of advice about acting in sitcoms?
It looks like their is some kind of bigger conflict that comes to play at the end. In one of the trailer Wanda talks about how Westview is their home and they need to fit for it. I've been wondering if that's just because S.W.O.R.D is trying to stop whatever she's doing to create all of that, or if there's another bad guy group, like HYDRA or someone along those lines, coming after her for some other more nefarious reason.
Well, Nightmare is the rumored villain for Doctor Strange 2, and as for Mephisto... well, he has a very personal connection to Tommy and Billy. Namely, they are created out of pieces of his soul. I think Tommy and Billy are the point of all of this. In the first episode, the cover of the magazine Agnes was reading spoke of a child's first words. In the second episode, the whole theme of the talent show was that it was "for the children". Said in that cult like monotone. Here's the thing... we haven't seen any children. And then Wanda's spontanious pregnancy?That's an interesting idea, and would be a nice final episode twist. It seems pretty much a fact at this point that Wanda is controlling things, but there's always a chance someone has manipulated her into doing all of this.
Do the twins have actual sitcom experience beyond the age of 2?
I think there's something much deeper than Wanda or Hydra or SWORD at play. Like Mephisto or Nightmare deep. After all, this is supposed to lead into the second Doctor Strange movie.
Personally, I think it's somehow "whomever" (SWORD, SHIELD, Hydra) has put her in this situation to get what they want. Well, I don't see that working out for them, but Wanda may end up resurrecting Vision, which opens things in future shows for them both to go forward.The lead in could just be Wanda wanting to learn more about (and more about controlling) her powers, particularly now that they seem to have blossomed in a really significant way, and turning to Strange to accomplish that. There certainly could be some kind of big bad tie in, but there doesn't need to be. And even if they want to tie it together in that way, it doesn't require the villain to be responsible for things here. Example: Nightmare spends Doctor Strange 2 hunting Wanda for her powers, and this is referenced as the incident that brought her to his attention.
Often.It's unintentional but the sort of threat, "normal" people in a weird house, feels little like Sapphire and Steel.
Paul's 70's hair is repellent.
How did men get laid back then looking like that?
Personally I never had a problem, but I was working the door at a nightclub those years, so I'm not the one to ask.How did men get laid back then looking like that?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.