The Constitution was the ONLY class of ship we saw in the fleet.
The point stands, by canon, that the Connie's were the best-of-the-best.
But, as we've clearly seen, the details of TOS mean little to the Discovery writers.
The Constitution was the ONLY class of ship we saw in the fleet.
Why would gender swapping someone change the events? If the DIS version of the Klingon D7 doesn't make it a reboot then sure as hell Scotty being a woman wouldn't make it one either! It is just updated visuals for modern audiences, man!Totally change events. Gender swap someone would be a dead give away. But looks are just that, looks that change in TV all the time. Retcons are super common in trek, I mean they do them all the freaking time. Changing the size to something that makes sense isn't a big deal.
The point stands, by canon, that the Connie's were the best-of-the-best.
But there was nothing to compare them to, until DSC came along.
I'm not disputing any of that.We don't have to have anything to compare them to. The characters and situations speak for them being the front line Starfleet ships.
I'm not disputing any of that.
Size doesn't matter.
Don't buy the lie!![]()
The Sovereign Class in the TNG Movie Era were considered the most advanced and powerful starships in the fleet, yet were smaller than the Galaxy Class.
Don't forget the Defiant. Though then again, it was built as a dedicated warship.The Sovereign Class in the TNG Movie Era were considered the most advanced and powerful starships in the fleet, yet were smaller than the Galaxy Class.
Just food for thought.
I don't know why you're so caught up over the size. We also only know the sizes of 2 ships from DSC.But it wasn't the smallest. Right now, the TOS Constitution's are smaller than pretty much every other Starfleet ship we've seen.
And wasn't actually even particularly impressive in combat, even though for some reason fans seem to think that it was. It is basically Federation Bird of Prey.Don't forget the Defiant. Though then again, it was built as a dedicated warship.
But there was nothing to compare them to, until DSC came along.
Just because it's smaller then the Crossfield doesn't make it weaker or less impressive.
Just look at the Defiant in DS9. One the smallest ships in the Fed fleet, but it kicked serious ass.
Debatable? It could go head to head with a design that was very very old in comparison, the Excelsior Refit class.
I don't know why you're so caught up over the size.
Actually, it makes them MORE of a 'Rare Collector's Item' since TOS is still on the air and the TOS films still air as well. (Assuming said items are still boxed/come with original packaging aka NFRB!.)Let's be real..
The reason why people are *really* upset about the revised TOS era Enterprise is because it makes all their TOS merch suddenly obsolete![]()
One thing (that is canon) to remember - per TOS - "The Cage", Pike's Enterprise held a crew compliment of 203.![]()
And the TOS writers guide called the Enterprise "the largest and most advanced vessel in space" or words to that effect![]()
Its pedantic continuity. They're trying hard to keep to the letter of events* while ignoring the spirit with which they were intended.But, as we've clearly seen, the details of TOS mean little to the Discovery writers.
Which was refit even further for the Dominion war.
It was said on screen to have upgraded phasers and quantum torpedoes.
Basically yes.Its pedantic continuity. They're trying hard to keep to the letter of events* while ignoring the spirit with which they were intended.
*with huge qualifiers like a massive tech upgrade, an all-new look, ignoring huge bits of lore they don't want to follow up on etc
I haven't got that feeling at all.But, as we've clearly seen, the details of TOS mean little to the Discovery writers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.