USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by EJD1984, Jul 24, 2017.

  1. Dry Bones 37

    Dry Bones 37 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    It's not directed towards anyone. Just a wry observation.
     
  2. Ronald Held

    Ronald Held Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    On the USS Sovereign
    Better DSC is not in the 2250's.
     
    Ricky Spanish likes this.
  3. Spaceship Jo

    Spaceship Jo Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2018
    If you look back at early press for each James Bond movie (at least as far back as the Daltons, but I suspect it's true all the way back), one of the elements they'd hype is "this time the female lead isn't just a Bond Girl, she's an equal and maybe better than Bond in a lot of ways". It's so strange to hear it said every time as though it's not the same exact thing they said last time, but it's just PR.

    That's what I think about when DSC goes to a different time. "If we make a prequel, we won't have to worry about continuity or canon" "if we go to the future, the options are wide open and we don't have the straight jacket of continuity or canon". And... ok, sure, but that was never what worked or didn't work about the writing. Do your own thing or adhere to canon rigidly (or both, it can be done), whatever you want. But what makes it good isn't that and what makes it bad isn't that either. :shrug:
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2019
    Rahul, Serveaux, Ghouleddie74 and 2 others like this.
  4. Belz...

    Belz... Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    I agree. Many artists do their best works when under constraints.

    Well, I'm looking forward to it.

    I wish they had gone to the late 24th, however. :)
     
    saddestmoon, Gonzo and Dry Bones 37 like this.
  5. Paul755

    Paul755 Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    It should have been set in the (post-Nemisis) future from the jump.
     
  6. Dry Bones 37

    Dry Bones 37 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    And then people would have complained about how it ruins Picard or some other continuity crap.

    There is no winning for this show.
     
  7. Longinus

    Longinus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Winning is very easy. Have interesting characters, write good stories, do not massively mess up the continuity. Thus far they have managed one out of three.
     
    saddestmoon, Rahul and Spaceship Jo like this.
  8. Dry Bones 37

    Dry Bones 37 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    I'd say two out of the three, but I know we won't see eye to eye on this one.

    And, no, it's not easy.
     
  9. Paul755

    Paul755 Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    I dunno, TNG managed fine being set 75 years after Trek 6.

    So set the show 75 years after Nemisis (or the Prime Universe events of the first Abrams movie)
     
  10. Dry Bones 37

    Dry Bones 37 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Well, they set the Picard show 18 years after the events of the Abrams movie so we will see how fans tolerate that.
     
  11. Longinus

    Longinus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Well, yes in reality it is not easy. But you're just trying to pretend that there is some unfair bias towards Discovery, but (aside nutjobs crying about SJWs etc.) there isn't. People criticise the show for completely valid reasons. It is serialised show which for two seasons in a row has failed to have a sensible and satisfactory serialised plot. And if they can't fix that, going to the future, to the past or to the magical kingdom of Equestria is not gonna help.
     
    Jerikka Dawn, Rahul, Jadeb and 3 others like this.
  12. Dry Bones 37

    Dry Bones 37 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    No, not really. I'm observing the tendency for Discovery to be criticized no matter their choices. I don't think of it as a bias, so much as a tendency since it is (currently) the only Trek on at the moment. Yes, some criticisms are valid. What is frustrating is that there is no love behind the criticisms at times. That every single compliment seems to mask a hidden dagger. It isn't that there are not valid critiques of Discovery-it's that they feel like they come from such a hateful place.

    I would say the same things regarding criticism towards the Picard show as well, and I don't even care for that show.
     
    Ghost Minion Dave and Lord Garth like this.
  13. starsuperion

    starsuperion Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    IDK.. I still prefer the classic to the new version..
    [​IMG]
     
    Longinus, Rahul and Jadeb like this.
  14. Dukhat

    Dukhat Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    While I agree with you, the pic you posted really isn't a valid comparison. The DSC Enterprise's size and proportions are quite different than that fan-made model on the bottom.
     
    saddestmoon, Rahul and starsuperion like this.
  15. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    King Daniel Beyond
    [​IMG]
    That's the actual model.
     
    saddestmoon, starsuperion and pst like this.
  16. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    ...Aaaand just straighten up the double pylons and you are done.

    Now, the next interesting step for the TPTB will be to insert a tabletop model of the above in PIC or one of the other "non-DSC" Trek incarnations. Any bets?

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    starsuperion likes this.
  17. Ghouleddie74

    Ghouleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Most Sincere Pumpkin Patch in the Galaxy
    Just to troll some of the fans I'd straighten the pylons to look like the TOS pylons. It'd be worth it to watch some heads explode about reverting to a design that some consider outdated and inconsistent(for their own reasoning).
     
    starsuperion and nightwind1 like this.
  18. Dukhat

    Dukhat Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    If that's their plan, I'd rather just not see it at all.
     
  19. starsuperion

    starsuperion Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    Honestly the model isn't so bad, but I don't like how thick the Nacelles are, and the squished saucer section and neck aren't my favorite. The black breaks in the nacelle should be closer to the collectors in the front. I'm okay with the pylons being slanted and more like ST:TMP era refit, however, remove the extra bit. It serves no purpose. Sigh....
    I suppose this is what we get when the licensing deal requires 25% difference.
     
  20. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    That isn't a real thing. It was debunked by CBS over a year ago.

    And debunked again in Discovery Season 2 this year when they used original footage from TOS in a previously on segment.

    Plus the Picard trailer having a Galaxy Class, and the TNG movie combadge with no changes
     
    JoeP likes this.