Yeah, the Crossfield doesn't strike me as advanced.
I don't see how.Seems pretty advanced to me. But to each his own.
I don't see how.
I think the Crossfied class is a workhorse design with a slant towards science and technology trials.Yeah, the Crossfield doesn't strike me as advanced.
The Discovery could barely take out one Klingon ship...
i meant then bigger shipsDiscovery takes out several in the episode where the Klingons were attacking a Federation Dilithium mine.
i meant then bigger ships
Mainly by catching the Klingons off guard and having the element of surprise for the first few minutes.Discovery takes out several in the episode where the Klingons were attacking a Federation Dilithium mine.
Mainly by catching the Klingons off guard and having the element of surprise for the first few minutes.
I would argue strongly that the Crossfield class is far more advanced than the Constitution class.
In my mind, the visual cues of the USS Discovery make it appear to be more advanced: the swept-back long nacelles, and pylons delta, it’s flat, low-profile, and it’s spinning saucer section - all suggest advancement in starship design.
‘Sleek’ and ‘long’, with a low profile, suggests speed (no matter what the actual in-universe capabilities are shown to be, IMO). Another much later example of this aesthetic at play would be exhibited in the Enterprise 1701-E, though despite its size is still fairly sleek a design, with length in the nacelles and proportionally a low profile in itself, with no neck.
The Discovery’s spinning saucer also suggest a tech which no other starfleet vessels have exhibited onscreen, making it fairly unique / rare / advanced as a spaceframe.
Removing the saucer undercut (which I suppose started with the Excelsior and has continued consistently IRL since then) makes designing the interior a lot simpler, but it does make the ship less attractive as an object.Also I found another thing I don't like with the DSC Enterprise, I don't like how flat the bottom of the saucer is.
Yes, I agree. Which is why writers' bibles shouldn't be used as evidence of anything (which was what the poster quoting that passage was trying to do.)
I would argue strongly that the Crossfield class is far more advanced than the Constitution class.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.