I really don't think that the illustrator(s) got the perspective right on that drawing. It's always bothered me. The saucer looks like it's going in a different direction from the rest of the ship.
I really don't think that the illustrator(s) got the perspective right on that drawing. It's always bothered me. The saucer looks like it's going in a different direction from the rest of the ship.
![]()
The TOS Enterprise has somewhat more recognition in the general public because of these:
yes. probert approached the design of the enterprise-D with a coherent, intentional ethic that shifted the design from simple geometric shapes to compound ovals and more complicated curves. i think that's why it's a truly great design -- probert completely rethought his approach to the enterprise. that's also what ryan church did and why the kelvin enterprise is so distinct (though i know you disagree there).I'm not as big a fan of the Enterprise-D - don't get me wrong, I really like the design, but I don't love it as much as the original - But the one thing the Ent-D did that was outstanding is - it is it's OWN design. It has a very clear identity on it's own, that is of course inspired by the original (like the Voyager or the NX-01) - but it clearly is it's very own, unique starship. Wheras the TMP refit and the JJprise are just "versions" of the same design. At least that's how I see it.
unfortunately, the discovery enterprise is less distinct, less successful because it's just not a fresh design. it's a modification of jefferies' classic enteprise. it pulls from the original, the refit, even the enterprise-B so it doesn't really have an identity of its own.
oh totally and i almost noted in my reply. it was a choice. for my money, not a good one, but it was deliberate.Well their instructions were to recreate the original design within the guidelines given by the higher ups.
It would never have it's own identity.
It never can have its own identity.Well their instructions were to recreate the original design within the guidelines given by the higher ups.
It would never have it's own identity.
I may be in the minority on this but I prefer the TFF Enterprise-A bridge to the one seen in TUC. Star Trek V may be the vastly inferior film but the Enterprise-A in that movie was a sleek and beautiful vessel right down to the bridge layout.
I may be in the minority on this but I prefer the TFF Enterprise-A bridge to the one seen in TUC. Star Trek V may be the vastly inferior film but the Enterprise-A in that movie was a sleek and beautiful vessel right down to the bridge layout.
I may be in the minority on this but I prefer the TFF Enterprise-A bridge to the one seen in TUC. Star Trek V may be the vastly inferior film but the Enterprise-A in that movie was a sleek and beautiful vessel right down to the bridge layout.
The turbo lifts have moved even farther apart, almost to opposite sides (neither will really fit in the shape at the top of the Enterprise model any longer, but that’s a whole different issue).Other than the lighting, painting and touchscreens, was there any difference between the two bridges?
The lighting and painting make a HUUUGE difference.Other than the lighting, painting and touchscreens, was there any difference between the two bridges?
design and layout wise, it's great. but i think the TUC version has it beat in terms of lighting (pre-abrams spotlights) and decoration (the red leather paneling and scratched metallic surfaces). the TNG-inspired TFF bridge is a little too clean and beige for the rough and tumble TOS era, in my opinion.I may be in the minority on this but I prefer the TFF Enterprise-A bridge to the one seen in TUC. Star Trek V may be the vastly inferior film but the Enterprise-A in that movie was a sleek and beautiful vessel right down to the bridge layout.
The Prometheus and Equinox bridges were actually redressed from the Excelsior bridge from "Flashback," which was rebuilt from scratch and slightly smaller than the original. The original TFF/TUC bridge was chopped up and reused. The very back part from the Excelsior bridge and some of the ceiling were used by DS9 for guest bridges and eventually the Defiant's mess hall and sickbay. The TMP doorframes and most of the computer consoles were used on the Enterprise E bridge in the TNG films.The basic layout was the same, right? Only the lightning was different (more bright in TFF, darker with more contrast in TUC).
But I honestly think - this is IMO the best Star Trek bridge ever. There is a reason they re-dressed it for every other ship bridge (from the Prometheus to the Equinox) - it's just a damn fine layout. It got the best looks of them all (functional, many stations, stylish design) - but it also has the perfect size. think the bridges from the Ent-E to the JJprise to the Discovery are all a bit too big - the actors disappear in it. Wheras on the Ent-A bridge - the Captain can stand in the middle of the bridge, and the background is perfectly framed - with many consols and extras, but not too much floor and ceiling like on these bigger bridge sets.
I have to say though, that I personally prefer the TUC-version visually (it just looks a bit more distinct). But even the TFF IMO trumps every other Trek bridge.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.