Good question....I'm wondering if it would when taking weapons fire, during collisions, etc?
USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?
- Thread starter EJD1984
- Start date
Good question....I'm wondering if it would when taking weapons fire, during collisions, etc?
Discoprise pylons do not look good.
The laws of Physics in the PU seem the same for classical phenomena. General relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Standard(particle) Model not certain.
The laws of Physics in the PU seem the same for classical phenomena. General relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Standard(particle) Model not certain.
Looked at as just an approximation, it's the Jefferies ship with curved pylons and some streamlines. Nothing there.
Yeah how dare they have a different opinion than you!
If you don't want to engage with it then I see no reason to carry it forward. I have had this discussion for nigh unto ten years and have heard from a variety of people, both for and against. It simply boiled down to how we engaged the material and enjoyed it. Which, hey, mileage will vary and all that.
Indeed. Uhura supports as much stating that a number of Klingon ships were destroyed or in distress prior to the incident on Vulcan. Nero was clearly unconcerned about starships of the day causing an issue for him.
Last edited:
Came across this image:
It's interesting that Jefferies used the 1701A designation, without hyphen:
Maybe the blue bussard thing on versions of Phase II was folks misinterpreting the coloring on this Mike Minor illustration?:
Let's all be thankful that Discovery didn't use something like this:
I really don't know what possessed Minor to come up with that, even as a rough work-in-progress.
Maybe the blue bussard thing on versions of Phase II was folks misinterpreting the coloring on this Mike Minor illustration?:
Let's all be thankful that Discovery didn't use something like this:
I really don't know what possessed Minor to come up with that, even as a rough work-in-progress.
It's interesting that Jefferies used the 1701A designation, without hyphen:
At some point in the process, the new Enterprise was supposed to be a totally different ship.
Hmmm....Z-101....NX-01....and check out that bridge window. 
Is that the hot rod look JJ was going for? 
It makes you wonder about a great many things. 
While the nacelles aren't how I'd have designed them I could live with those. I wouldn't have the pylons curved, however, and would just make them straight like the original TOS pylons but thicker to give the impression they're supporting a much greater weight.
It's ok. They're weightless.
Because it's fun and imaginative.Unless you build them on Earth, of course. Or take them underwater. But why would someone do anything as silly as that with a starship?...
So....was this the Enterprise, or the Vengeance:
https://globalnews.ca/news/4319302/cousteau-family-members-shag-harbour/
https://globalnews.ca/news/4319302/cousteau-family-members-shag-harbour/
It's interesting that Jefferies used the 1701A designation, without hyphen:
Maybe the blue bussard thing on versions of Phase II was folks misinterpreting the coloring on this Mike Minor illustration?:
In what way would it be a misinterpretation?
Similar threads
