• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?

No, the argument is that it was made in the 1960's using 1960's techniques on a 1960's budget for 1960's sci-fi expectations. It looks cheap, it looks under detailed (which no amount of textures can fix) and it looks simplistic.

Hence why the movies used a refit as an excuse for not bringing the model back.
Agreed - buttt that logic applies to the model. Not the design.

The design is as futuristic as it ever was. That’s why DSC didn’t do more of a radical change. I don’t think they needed to change it as much as they did, but it is what it is.
 
Yep. They'll throw in retro details, but still aren't trying to convince me it is something it clearly isn't. Putting the little boomerang on the side of the Discovery version doesn't make it the original Enterprise.

But there is some solace in that, like @Serveaux said, no one will remember this version ten minutes after Discovery is over. :lol:

Like the car, they only want to evoke the nostalgia to get the money from aging individuals, exploiting their emotional connection before buyers remorse sets in. The go faster stripes/arrow head are the selling point.

But you're right, once the new Kelvinverse movie hits theatres and a new 4K ultra detailed Enterprise-A appears on the big screen, people won't care about anything else, especially a washed out 720p version.
 
The perfect cloak was theoretical, not the device itself.

You must be wearing out your tap shoes! ;)

Spock says nothing about a perfect cloak...

SPOCK: Invisibility is theoretically possible, Captain, with selective bending of light. But the power cost is enormous. They may have solved that problem.

SPOCK: Obviously, their weaponry is superior to ours, and they have a practical invisibility screen.

The Klingons obviously had a "practical" invisibility screen, as the plot point of one of the Discovery episodes was figuring out how to detect them.
 
What if the Original Series Enterprise DID have a Bridge Window/VIewscreen and Kirk just preferred to never use it as one?

If we're going to make grand assumptions about Spock's Intelligence in TWoK, then this would easily explain why he didn't suggest it.
:techman:
Then if it was as advantageous to have a window as has been suggested then Kirk was negligent or incompetent... Hehe :lol:
 
I'd imagine there will be some small alternations between the Season 1 finale and Season 2 since the model in season 1 only had to be shown once.

Then if it was as advantageous to have a window as has been suggested then Kirk was negligent or incompetent... Hehe :lol:

Who is saying it is advantageous?
 
Discovery had to make 132-133 inter-spatial jumps and fire nearly her entire compliment of weaponry to outline a non-moving, massive target.

No other Starfleet vessel could accomplish anything like that.
 
Discovery had to make 132-133 inter-spatial jumps and fire nearly her entire compliment of weaponry to outline a non-moving, massive target.

No other Starfleet vessel could accomplish anything like that.

How perfect was that cloak that it took all that to bust it?
 
Last edited:
Nothing in the show said that ship had anything to do with the Hur'q.

So we're ignoring that Kahless was only 1500 years ago, that from DS9 it's heavily implied Klingons made major leap through "killing their gods" which is likely them having murdered a Beta Quadrant invader that wanted to conquer them, and that the Black Fleet in no way resembles any known Klingon design in 50 years and could easily belong to another race?

It would all add up very nicely...
 
So we're ignoring that Kahless was only 1500 years ago, that from DS9 it's heavily implied Klingons made major leap through "killing their gods" which is likely them having murdered a Beta Quadrant invader that wanted to conquer them, and that the Black Fleet in no way resembles any known Klingon design in 50 years and could easily belong to another race?

It would all add up very nicely...

Maybe it wasn't humor! :lol:
 
So we're ignoring that Kahless was only 1500 years ago, that from DS9 it's heavily implied Klingons made major leap through "killing their gods" which is likely them having murdered a Beta Quadrant invader that wanted to conquer them, and that the Black Fleet in no way resembles any known Klingon design in 50 years and could easily belong to another race?

It would all add up very nicely...
All of that is speculation.

Also the Black Fleet is the afterlife, not an actual fleet. A variant on Sto'vo'kor.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top