Why are you still posting here if you don’t care about the show?
USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?
- Thread starter EJD1984
- Start date
And yet you keep talking about it. Over and over and over. Seems like it matters to you quite a bit.
The people who own the franchise seem to disagree with you, and I don't need to tell you who's word I will value more.
So is Paramount based on the look of the Kelvin timeline bridge of the Enterprise.
#TooSoon?
That would be a deliberate inversion of the Peter Principal, and I've seen some companies do this deliberately as a protective measure. This is one reason why some school districts, for example, refuse to consider internal candidates for administrative positions, because they're trying to prevent their top performing teachers from moving out of the classroom and into offices where the skill set that made them very good teachers would be less than useless. IIRC, non-commissioned officers in many military organizations also don't have to live by the "up or out" doctrine of commissioned officers, because it's recognized that the skill set that might make you an incredibly successful sergeant might not translate into being a good master sergeant.
Seems like there was no legal issue after all:
http://trekcore.com/blog/2018/04/enterprise-redesign-for-star-trek-discover-creative-not-legal/
http://trekcore.com/blog/2018/04/enterprise-redesign-for-star-trek-discover-creative-not-legal/
Further proof of my conspiracy theory that TOS is really a dramatic recreation of Kirk's 5 Year Mission!
But in turn ignored how it looked in 2254
Made when? Star Trek's world has the production values to make TOS look even more amazing than that "boring" real TMP-onward footage!Further proof of my conspiracy theory that TOS is really a dramatic recreation of Kirk's 5 Year Mission!
Which, while odd, is at least a possibility. She was only seen once in 2254, and it was in the until the 1990s, unaired pilot, and reused footage for "The Menagerie", which if I recall only had the opening shot of the Enterprise (the zoom into the bridge with Captain Pike). So the ship could be different then, compared to the more well known version under Captain Kirk that was seen a lot more often (even though that too had variations). Kirk's mid-late 2260s version was seen in other shows as well as TOS, so there is that crossover factor to consider as well, verses Pike's ship in the mid-2250s.
You're really not leaving any door open to the idea of retcons, eh?
Nothing wrong with Retcons, I just seems odd they'd only think of the TOS one.
"Starfleet denies any knowledge of an organization called Section 31."
"The Vulcan Science Directorate has determined that time travel is impossible"
Good one.
True, but the developers for the "Star Trek" holonovel were probably some sort of low-budget indie studio using twenty-year-old rendering software for their holographic sandbox, and even then were mainly putting the novels together for kids. I would guess this is the same studio that did that cheesy Lost in Space interactive adventure based loosely on that real-world UESPA expedition from 2089.Made when? Star Trek's world has the production values to make TOS look even more amazing than that "boring" real TMP-onward footage!
It wasn't until years later, after the V'ger incident that made the Enterprise famous, that a more faithful recreation of Earth's favorite starship was published for a more mature audience.
Speaking of: T'Pol on DSC. Make it happen. She'd be 169 years old at most and about the only lead character from ENT who could still be alive at this point in history.
I could go for that and hopefully they've gotten better at old age makeup.
Phlox could be another option. This page claims 170-280 year lifespans for Denobulans.
Similar threads
