Sexism: Shatner lost his shirt in every other episode but none of the hot ladies ever did. No fair!
I grew up with the original series and I considered it very progressive (it was) for it's time. I was always off-put by its visual cheesyness though so I tended to bury myself in the novels - especially Alan Dean Foster's novelizations of the animated series. Later of course, the movies and 24th century spin-offs dominated the Trek landscape. It wasn't until a few years ago that I got the DVDs of TOS and watched the episodes I hadn't seen in decades. I was THUNDERSTRUCK by the sexism. It's quite a statement of how far we have come since the sixties. I thought nothing of it in the early seventies reruns era but today, it is shocking.
The Cage was made in 1964 and showed a strong, brilliant woman as 2nd in Command. That was too great a leap for the network suits, who were paid to know what their audience would accept.
That's the way Roddenberry tells it. According to Solow and Justman in Inside Star Trek, the network loved the idea of a female second-in-command, but didn't like the fact that Roddenberry cast his mistress in the role, something that could create a scandal if it got out. They wanted the role recast, but not because of the character's sex.
After all, the same decade gave us strong female protagonists like Emma Peel, Cinnamon Carter, and Agent 99. While sexist assumptions certainly did exist, they didn't preclude the depiction of strong, capable women on television.
Wouldn't the women's uniforms alone count as sexist.
I have heard the Solow and Justman version of the "Number One" issue and I wouldn't doubt that there's some truth to it.
Wouldn't the women's uniforms alone count as sexist.
No. Mini skirts in that time and place were considered a sign of women's liberation and their ability to show their sexuality.
I grew up with the original series and I considered it very progressive (it was) for it's time. I was always off-put by its visual cheesyness though so I tended to bury myself in the novels - especially Alan Dean Foster's novelizations of the animated series. Later of course, the movies and 24th century spin-offs dominated the Trek landscape. It wasn't until a few years ago that I got the DVDs of TOS and watched the episodes I hadn't seen in decades. I was THUNDERSTRUCK by the sexism. It's quite a statement of how far we have come since the sixties. I thought nothing of it in the early seventies reruns era but today, it is shocking.
Against the backdrop of the 60's it was progressive. Why condemn it now?
I grew up with the original series and I considered it very progressive (it was) for it's time. I was always off-put by its visual cheesyness though so I tended to bury myself in the novels - especially Alan Dean Foster's novelizations of the animated series. Later of course, the movies and 24th century spin-offs dominated the Trek landscape. It wasn't until a few years ago that I got the DVDs of TOS and watched the episodes I hadn't seen in decades. I was THUNDERSTRUCK by the sexism. It's quite a statement of how far we have come since the sixties. I thought nothing of it in the early seventies reruns era but today, it is shocking.
Against the backdrop of the 60's it was progressive. Why condemn it now?
I'm not sure what you mean by "condemn it." I'm not saying it was wrong of them include all that sexism because in their own minds, they were not being sexist at all; they were being progressive for the time. It does make many of the episodes difficult for me to watch today though. I can understand perfectly when someone 35 or younger watches TOS and experiences total WTF moments over the blatant sexism and all the racism towards Spock.
TOS was wonderful in its time but many elements of it have become badly and painfully dated.
The racism toward Spock mirrored my own life as an outsider. It gave me someone with whom I could identify, and it saved me from teenage suicide.
“No, and I agreed with her reasons.” I.e., an unattractive woman has no value in society.
“No, and I agreed with her reasons.” I.e., an unattractive woman has no value in society.
And all this time, I thought she preferred to keep living a fulfilling "life" (albeit a fancy one) than try to build a new life at a very advanced age. Silly me...
[url=http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/1.htm]Chrissie's Transcripts[/url] said:PIKE: Let's get back to the ship.
VINA: I can't. I can't go with you.
(Vina changes into a scarred, misshapen older woman)
VINA: You see why I can't go with you.
MAGISTRATE: This is the female's true appearance.
VINA: They found me in the wreckage, dying. A lump of flesh. They rebuilt me. Everything works. But they had never seen a human. They had no guide for putting me back together.
MAGISTRATE: It was necessary to convince you her desire to stay is an honest one.
PIKE: You'll give her back her illusion of beauty?
MAGISTRATE: And more.
(Beautiful Vina and happy Pike go up the slope and into the elevator)
MAGISTRATE: She has an illusion and you have reality. May you find your way as pleasant.
[Transporter room]
PITCAIRN: Mister Spock, the system is coming on again.
(Pike is beamed aboard)
COLT: What's happened to Vina?
ONE: Isn't she coming with us?
PIKE: No. No, and I agreed with her reasons.
Yep, you're right it has to be sexist. Couldn't be any other reason.
Yep, you're right it has to be sexist. Couldn't be any other reason.
Yep, you’re right, I’m really going way out on a limb by assuming that when Pike says he agrees with her reason he’s referring to the reason she gave him.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.