This question is absurd on its face. It's all imaginary. There can be no "proof" because none of it is real.
We start pulling at that thread, the whole thing unravels...

This question is absurd on its face. It's all imaginary. There can be no "proof" because none of it is real.
This question is absurd on its face. It's all imaginary. There can be no "proof" because none of it is real.
Which is why I’ll never understand people who get their panties in a wad when I tell them that SNW takes place in an alternate universe from TOS.
Probably because it’s factually wrong.
You can say “I like to imagine that…” or “It makes more sense to me if…”
But if you make a declarative statement that is objectively wrong, well…people are likely to say something.
There’s a lot of hyperbole here as well. I don’t see many people having the kind of emotional reaction you describe here.
But in the end, yes, it doesn’t matter. It’s all pretend.
![]()
On the contrary, we received confirmation in the episode SNW S2, E3.This question is absurd on its face. It's all imaginary. There can be no "proof" because none of it is real.
On the contrary, we received confirmation in the episode SNW S2, E3.
On the contrary, we received confirmation in the episode SNW S2, E3.
Absolutely true, and we've also seen events and people being repeated more or less in similar ways in different timelines. Its even been stated in an episode how the timeline continues to correct itself after events have been changed.and yet we have Boimler stepping onto the SNW Enterprise and not batting an eye at anything he sees. To him, everything is as it should be. Plus, we have Spock's work on Vulcan/Romulan reunification being a pretty major plot point in the later seasons of Discovery.
This is why these discussions can become quite exhausting. There is no "proof" in the concrete sense. There is the stated point of the art, and interpretation of it.Sure, and someone who can't stand the idea that it's all the same timeline will claim that "Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow" means they're separate timelines.
It's all fiction. The concept of "proof" is inapplicable.
and yet we have Boimler stepping onto the SNW Enterprise and not batting an eye at anything he sees. To him, everything is as it should be. Plus, we have Spock's work on Vulcan/Romulan reunification being a pretty major plot point in the later seasons of Discovery.
Ab
Absolutely true, and we've also seen events and people being repeated more or less in similar ways in different timelines. Its even been stated in an episode how the timeline continues to correct itself after events have been changed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.