A post in the TNG board got me thinking.
Everyone has things they like/dislike about Star Trek, not all of them will be the same but there are some elements that seem to be beloved/despised by the vast majority, so going against these trends makes you something of a misfit in the Trek fandom. But I thought I'd throw this out as a place for people to actually give voice to the elements they like/dislike that go against the 'norm'.
It's a safe place, so no petty bickering or squabbling, please. Remember, manners cost nothing.
I'll get the ball rolling:
I can't stand the Doctor from Voyager. I find him incredibly overrated, egotistical, grating and hammy, to the point I have no interest in "holographic rights" or any medical related plots from the show, as I know he'll feature too heavily. In the beginning, when he was limited to Sickbay, he was at least a sympathetic character due to the constraints placed upon him, but as he grew he became all the more insufferable.
Everyone has things they like/dislike about Star Trek, not all of them will be the same but there are some elements that seem to be beloved/despised by the vast majority, so going against these trends makes you something of a misfit in the Trek fandom. But I thought I'd throw this out as a place for people to actually give voice to the elements they like/dislike that go against the 'norm'.
It's a safe place, so no petty bickering or squabbling, please. Remember, manners cost nothing.
I'll get the ball rolling:
I can't stand the Doctor from Voyager. I find him incredibly overrated, egotistical, grating and hammy, to the point I have no interest in "holographic rights" or any medical related plots from the show, as I know he'll feature too heavily. In the beginning, when he was limited to Sickbay, he was at least a sympathetic character due to the constraints placed upon him, but as he grew he became all the more insufferable.
Last edited: