Bigger question-how does it affect enjoyment?Again, how tall is Spock in canon? Kirk? Pike? Does Saavik look like Kirsty Alley or Robin Curtis? Why does tech have one standard and flesh another?
Bigger question-how does it affect enjoyment?Again, how tall is Spock in canon? Kirk? Pike? Does Saavik look like Kirsty Alley or Robin Curtis? Why does tech have one standard and flesh another?
By causing a debate.Bigger question-how does it affect enjoyment?
Mileage will vary.By causing a debate.
And debating is joy.![]()
Did 13 incg color or black and white TVs have assumed feature in 1968. I watched Star Trek on one on NBC, and I don't recall such a feature on the TV myself.You can fairly easily make out "Scale in Feet" next to the yardstick, esp if you zoom in on it.
I was wondering about that. Rewatching it on VHS and it was difficult to make out.Did 13 incg color or black and white TVs have assumed feature in 1968. I watched Star Trek on one on NBC, and I don't recall such a feature on the TV myself.![]()
If anybody else wants a different size, have at it. Makes no difference to me what you believe.
Is it wrong that I absolutely love this "new" era of design?
Reminds me of the glory days of the FJ manual and I'll take it. I'm right there with you being wrong.Is it wrong that I absolutely love this "new" era of design?
Yeah I've always hated the Oval and Spoon shaped saucer sections of the 24th century design aesthetic.There's just something about the simpleness of a saucer based design. I like some of the 24/25 century designs, but when it comes to my favorites, I always seem to fall back to the 23rd or even the 22nd century.
So the Archer is basically the Saladin, scaled down to the Archer-class scout of the novelverse.
You’re not making any sense.Goddamn, love these ones!
Hell, they look even more TOS-style than the actual Discoprise.![]()
They don't have that squished flat look the SNWprise does next to the original. I feel it lost some of it's majesty.You’re not making any sense.
They’re kitbashes of the Enterprise. How can they look more TOS when they use parts directly from it? Same warp engines, same bridge module. In the case of the Farragut the exact same saucer. Even parts of the secondary hull are mushed into the bottom of Farragut’s saucer.
What King Daniel said. Also, those weird windows along the saucer's edge.You’re not making any sense.
They’re kitbashes of the Enterprise. How can they look more TOS when they use parts directly from it? Same warp engines, same bridge module. In the case of the Farragut the exact same saucer. Even parts of the secondary hull are mushed into the bottom of Farragut’s saucer.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.