• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The OFFICIAL STNG-R general discussion thread!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Darren didn't use current tech to make it look as bad as it did in the sixties. He used current tech to emulate the tech that would have been available to film makers back when TOS was made. The aesthetic of the show intact. The approach of his Trek Enhanced was to respect the tech that was available at the time, but also consider what they could have accomplished with a higher weekly budget.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L7EB7iyfAc

It is far from a 1 to 1 copy, but the work matches the show.
Oh, I like that. Thanks for posting. :)

The scale is still off, though. The PK through the shuttle's window looks like it's miles away, when it should be filling the whole view! TOS-R was the same.
 
Horse manure!

$30-40 is where just about everything else sells, why should Trek sell (even the old standard-def version of TOS) at 3-4 times that?
What other shows are selling 7-disc Blu-ray sets for $30?

I don't know about Blu Ray specifically, but the standard price for season sets is between 30 and 40 dollars with a very few up to 50.

Stargate, new BSG, X-files, etc all retail in that range., barring a sale or going to Wal-Mart.

Explain why Trek routinely sells for 3x that or more per season.

Where the hell are you buying your blurry series from. New releases on blurry for full season shows (that's currently 22 episodes) go for 45-70 dollars typically in the US. BSG sold for over 60 when it came out, from sites like amazon, places like Walmart, target best buy.

Now years later you can see some steep discounts and sale prices that get shows lower like two season of BSG are 19.99 on amazon for a small period of time, but they will go back up.

The only bluray shows I see in the normally 30-40 period are shows that did half seasons or less, meaning shows that produced 13 or fewer episodes a season. Or full season comedies, roughly the same as a 13 episode hour long.

Walking Dead 26, for six episodes
Downton Abby 30 for ten episodes
Sherlock 26 for three episodes
Games of Thrones 45 for ten episodes

Tons of examples.

Now with services like Amazon in the first year of release most shows at some point will get a hefty discount. A show that might for most of the year sell for 50 will drop to 39 for a few weeks, ect.

And network shows tend to sell a little cheaper. Cable and syndication shows all tend to sell at higher prices. Cable often being per hour very expensive even with sale prices.

And all the Bluray tv series currently out are just released on bluray. They don't spend a months doing new technical work before they can release them. Both TNG and TOS had excessive new expenses that other don't have.

Seriously based on your post I think you are confusing DVD with BluRay
X-Files the tv show isn't released on BluRay and when it came out on DVD sold for 99.99 it took years and going to smaller sets before the price of the X-Files DVD dropped. Now they are cheap, but it's been over a decade.

Stargate has only released Stargate Universe season sets on BluRay, Atlantis is buy all or nothing currently, and SG1 has never been released on Blu-Ray.
 
If you are just talking about DVD prices, for the last five or so years Trek on DVD I have found between 39 to 55 per season, on stores like Walmart.

Both Trek and XFiles come out for roughly the same price. Locally at 100 a season. XFiles changed their releases, made them smaller and dropped the prices. I don't think Trek has ever changed how they were originally packaged for any of the series.

And even with DVD you will find Cable shows to still generally be more expensive or close to it when they come out. Look at Camelot, Borgias, Game of Thrones, Sherlock, first season when it came out of Downton Abby, Walking Dead, Empire, ect all have episodes counts from as low as three episodes to no more then 13 and can retail for anywhere between 20 - 40 dollars. All of Trek except ENT and TOS had 26 episodes a season, TOS averaged more then 26 episodes a season. ENT averaged 24 which is still more then most US full season network shows.
 
Horse manure!

$30-40 is where just about everything else sells, why should Trek sell (even the old standard-def version of TOS) at 3-4 times that?
What other shows are selling 7-disc Blu-ray sets for $30?

I don't know about Blu Ray specifically, but the standard price for season sets is between 30 and 40 dollars with a very few up to 50.

Stargate, new BSG, X-files, etc all retail in that range., barring a sale or going to Wal-Mart.

Explain why Trek routinely sells for 3x that or more per season.

Yeah...Fringe, SGU, Smallville...you can get them for $20 on sale and they're usually ~$40.
 
Oh, I like that. Thanks for posting. :)

The scale is still off, though. The PK through the shuttle's window looks like it's miles away, when it should be filling the whole view! TOS-R was the same.

Yeah, but perhaps the shuttle windows could be both a window and a viewscreen...so maybe Decker reduced magnification.

Anyway, that's how I would have enjoyed seeing TOS-R being remade. CGI that really nailed the details of the 60's effects (lighting, physicality of the models, etc), but at the same time cleaned them up and made them look like they were higher budget for the time.

If you haven't seen Darren's work before, you can check out more of it in the ST:TMP Directors Edition. He was part of the team who created some new CGI effects for that movie that matched the look of the original effects.
 
Horse manure!

$30-40 is where just about everything else sells, why should Trek sell (even the old standard-def version of TOS) at 3-4 times that?
What other shows are selling 7-disc Blu-ray sets for $30?

I don't know about Blu Ray specifically, but the standard price for season sets is between 30 and 40 dollars with a very few up to 50.

Stargate, new BSG, X-files, etc all retail in that range., barring a sale or going to Wal-Mart.

Explain why Trek routinely sells for 3x that or more per season.

Demand.
 
Blu-ray season set pricing & TNG-R

Explain why Trek routinely sells for 3x that or more per season.

Demand.
Yes. Ian Keldon have you seen HBO's original series on Blu-ray costs?
prices are all (USA) Amazon for Blu-ray season sets for reference discussion:
Band of Brothers $56. (10 year old series)
The Pacific $55. 2 year old series
Game of Thrones: The Complete First Season (2011) $45.
The Sopranos: The Complete First Season (2009) $24.
all under 13 episodes for a season

ABC Network:
Lost: The Complete Sixth and Final Season $45.
Lost: The Complete First Season $29.92
Lost: The Complete Collection 6 seasons (36 Blu-ray discs) $237.99
Grey's Anatomy: The Complete Fourth Season $36.99
24 episodes/season

CBS Network:
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation - The Ninth Season (2009) $63.49
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation: The Complete First Season [Blu-ray] $60.99
NCIS: Los Angeles - The First Season 2010 $46.99
24 episodes/season

These are all a comparison but Lost's 6 seasons going for $237. a couple years after it ended should give you an idea of $39./season for a complete series cost for ABC so you can expect Trek to be double. Why is CSI so much more per season? Considering they haven't released any other CSI season sets and just released a 1-episode Blu-ray for a 7-year-old season 5 2-part episode directed by a famous director for $15. shows they are not selling a lot and CBS Home video does not want to put money into manufacturing and releasing the physical Blu-ray discs.
 
Last edited:
My rental copy of 'The Next Level' arrived so I've finally had a first-hand look (and listen), just to skip through a few scenes. I'm planning on watching it on an HD projector with surround sound shortly, which should be excellent.

Anyway, quite aside from the brilliant picture quality, the first thing I noticed was how much deeper and slower the audio was! Then I realised, for years and years of UK TV broadcasts and DVD viewings that I'd been victim to the dreaded 'PAL speed-up', completely unaware of how much faster and higher pitched these shows were being presented. Only now, at their original 24fps, am I seeing and hearing the correct speed.

I was honestly shocked by the difference. I've been watching TNG recently so it was still fresh in my mind. All the characters sound really deep-voiced, I could barely recognise them. The title music actually sounded quite a bit better, more like the movie theme on which it's based. I've been hearing it slightly sped up and higher pitched all these years and it always sounded a bit 'cheap'.

Never mind the picture quality, the biggest adjustment is going to be the audio! I'm not sure I could switch back and forth between them easily. It's all or nothing from now on!

Re: visual changes. The CGI Enteprise at the start of 'The Inner Light' didn't look too bad in motion and in the context of the episode. It wasn't especially distracting, and if they can improve upon it further for future releases, I probably won't even notice. That said, the brief glimpse of the four-foot model looked fine, detail and all, so I don't mind what they do. Either way, it's clear as a bell and has never looked better. :)

I'll settle down to watch them all properly soon.
 
Last edited:
This is my main issue with TOS-R...they did not keep the FX looking as close as possible to the tone of the original footage. In a small handful of episodes they did manage to get the work to look like it was the original studio lighting and model, but the rest of the time the quality was all over the place. Some shots looked like scenes replicated from the movies, others looked worse than fan offerings found online. Overall the new cgi did not fit the show. Had Darren Dochterman been allowed to bring his skills to the project, then the cgi would have fit within the show. He has emulated everything from the studio lighting, right down to the type of lenses they used on the cameras back in the sixties.
What I saw them do is clean up the live action footage as much as possible so it *didn't* look as 60's (tried to make it looks as much of the 23rd century as possible with the source footage). This included major work on special FX used in live action sequences, like the phaser beams looking like actual energy, and not some hand drawn lines using neon colored crayons.

While the CGI did not always match the live action, I chalk this up to the fact that the budget did not allow it. Sure I would have loved to see some radically detailed models of the Enterprise, as well as Space Stations. But I'm happy with what they did. It makes the series 10 times more watchable.
There's really no point using the latest Computer technology to make things look as bad as they did in the 60s, complete waste of everyone's time.
TNG needed the same treatment as TOS. It needed to be livened up. What they are doing right now is sticking the show in the 80's, but with better clarity. When I pop in TOS-R, I feel like I'm watching a 60's show made with early 2000 film technology. When I see TNG-R, I feel like I'm watching the exact same series, but a bit sharper and cleaner. Initial reaction is good, but the show will suffer staying dated.

I agree a bit here with you. The show is achieving the goal of being watchable on HD screens, but it's really missing a great opportunity here to up the FX with new ship angles, flybys, orbit shots, additional ship classes, better planets, and more 'active' matte shots.
 
I agree a bit here with you. The show is achieving the goal of being watchable on HD screens, but it's really missing a great opportunity here to up the FX with new ship angles, flybys, orbit shots, additional ship classes, better planets, and more 'active' matte shots.

Then we would miss this opportunity to see how the original effects elements look when recomposited with modern tech vs. What they had in the late eighties, because they simply will not recomposite every shot ...and create alternate shots in cgi to please everyone. The cgi lovers got their wish with TOSR, I'm getting the product I have waited years for...but never dreamed would happen due to technical hurdles and cost.
 
I love elements of both of the physical Ent-D models to not see them in HD glory and the way she looks in the BD now is just... wonderful. I'll greatly give-up seeing "more angles" and shots of the ship to see the 6-footer's graceful lines in all of their glory or some of the great more dynamic shots of the 4-footer.

I don't need it replaced with CGI to enjoy it, if they want to replace any ships with CGI they can replace the guest-alien ship(s) as we only ever saw a handful of those. (How many alien races uses that bulky triangular thing?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top