The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies: Kelvin Universe' started by Agent Richard07, Apr 30, 2009.


Grade the movie...

  1. Excellent

    707 vote(s)
  2. Above Average

    213 vote(s)
  3. Average

    84 vote(s)
  4. Below Average

    46 vote(s)
  5. Poor

    77 vote(s)
  1. VulcanJedi

    VulcanJedi Captain Captain

    Jul 19, 2006
    New England
    Yes. All this "stuff" was tacked on AFTER TOS went off the air. It was a great show---but these utopian messages were really only a fraction of the content of the program. And Kirk and or Bones were foils and dissenters against some of it-the PC diatribes usually were made by Spock. Kirk or Bones were usually a stand in for the average Joe in the audience. In the end Spock was often right--but still the opposing views were heard and sometimes Spock was wrong, sort of.

    With TNG you had a whole crew drinking the kool-aid of a sort of pseudo-socialist agenda with little dissent. Picard's smugness told the audience he fully expected everyone to agree with his post-post-modern world view.

    People will say "look to Roddenberry," but TOS in reality never put to the screen a pure Roddenberry concept---the final product was an amalgamation of different people's input.
  2. pookha

    pookha Admiral Admiral

    Dec 26, 2002
    yep with tribbles being one of the best examples and galileo 7 up there too.
    in conscience of the king kirk arranges to strand the company of players and when spock reminds him it is 8 light years out of the way kirk snaps.
    and while they did have a briefing room it was on another floor so if they were in the midst of a crisis they would have it out on the bridge.

    bones and jim right from the bat go at it on the bridge in the corbomite maneuver.
  3. Stanley

    Stanley Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Aug 19, 2005
    It was fun, but as "Star Trek" it was disappointing. There was plenty of humor in the old show -- Leonard Nimoy had a wonderfully dry wit -- and it could be lighthearted, even downright silly, but most of the time it portrayed serious adults dealing with dangerous situations.

    This felt like a comic book version of the show. Six billion Vulcans die --boohoo, what happens next? Scotty in the reagent tube was like a scene from the Jetsons.

    I liked most of the actors. Karl Urban nailed Leonard McCoy. Zachary Quinto and Chris Pine did a good job. But as far as I'm concerned, Manny Coto has done the best job of modernizing Trek while keeping its original spirit, and I wish he had done the movie.
  4. startrekwatcher

    startrekwatcher Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Jun 9, 2007
    I definitely agree that Coto, the Reeves-Stevenses and Mike Sussman did a much better job in capturing the TOS feel in season four. XI just felt like another standard action flick with a lot of sound & fury that just used the recognizable aesthetics of Trek and a bunch of pointless namedropping unlike season four where the writers used previously mentioned characters or elements in service of the story.

    I would prefer that Abrams would use different writers other than Orci & Kurtzman. The script coupled with the interviews I've read from them don't fill me with a great deal of confidence. There are even more talented writers Abrams has worked with and could use such as Damon Lindeloff and Carlton Cuse--they've demonstrated they can embrace continuity, pay attention to details, write a solid plot arc and even have time for characters.
  5. Opal1

    Opal1 Ensign Red Shirt

    May 21, 2009
    Okay... here's my two cents...

    First, I have to admit that I've always been more of a casual fan...
    While I'm too young to have seen TOS when it first aired I still love it... but I never really got into TNG and the shows that came after it... (I was always waiting for Kirk and Spock to suddenly turn around a corner... :lol:)

    I wasn't convinced a new movie with young actors playing these iconic characters could be a good idea but Surprise! It works.

    The movie is fast paced, funny and visually stunning (The new Enterprise is very beautiful but HUGE compared to TOS :eek:) I like the new bridge and that everything is shiny brand-spanking new :lol:
    The new actors all do a phantastic job... my personal favourite being Z. Quinto who is a perfect younger Spock (And how mindblowing for Z. Quinto to meet the "real" Spock/L. Nimoy)

    Yes, there are plot holes... Kirk meeting old Spock on some random ice planet :wtf: come on! And who in their right mind would give the Federation's most important ship to a bunch of cadets in a time of crisis???
    And I would have liked to see more about the new crew getting to know each other and their new ship.

    Then there's the alternative timeline thing... I've read a few very angry posts about J.J. Abrams killing ST etc.
    I really don't get it. Alternative timelines and mirror universes aren't exactly new to ST... it's been done before dozens of times. And if you really want to be nitpicky you'd have to argue that there *is* no "real" timeline. Every episode/movie with time travel etc. has altered the timeline and created a whole "new" universe (Travelling back in time to fetch a few whales, anyone?).
    And let's be honest... the last movie and show weren't exactly a smashing success... Abrams knew that for ST to survive he needed to "upgrade" it and to make it watchable for non-fans who don't know a Klingon from a Vulcan (yet). Including all the facts and dates etc. from the "original" timeline would simply have been too much.

    So, yes, I like the new movie very much. It's a perfect new beginning and I hope we'll get to see more soon.
  6. Australis

    Australis Writer Admiral

    Mar 12, 2005
    Yay! Page 100! And they said it couldn't be done!

    Well, not really. But it's the thought that counts.
  7. Bob The Skutter

    Bob The Skutter Complete Arse Cleft Premium Member

    Jul 12, 2001
    Bob The Skutter
    I'm only on page 50... get back to me in 50 pages.
  8. Minuialeth

    Minuialeth Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    May 11, 2009
    Normandy, France
    Prime Spock's dry wit only came at the middle of the first season of TOS, when his friendship with Kirk was established.
    They are at each other throat (figuratively and litterally!) for most of the movie so you can't have that. Though you start to have a bit of it at the end, for instance when Kirk slaps Spock's shoulder saying "We are starting to understand each other" (paraphrasing, French dubbed). Spock's face at the familiar gesture is priceless :lol:
    I also love the banter in TOS (I'm currently transcribing a lot of it as I rewatch the episodes) but I'm waiting for the second movie to see that. If Abrams directs it (and I hope he does), I'm sure there will be some banter and the actors can certainly pull it off.
    There are already great funny moments between Spock and McKoy in this movie. I don't know how it is in the original version, but in French Bones says to Spock "What Vulcan fly has stung you?!" and he says "Green-blooded mule" when Spock has left. It was just like watching a TOS episode :lol: Karl Urban is just perfect as Bones.

    As for dealing with Vulcan's destruction, I have the same answer: wait for the next movie. This one was to establish the alternate reality, they couldn't cram everything in it (though I agree with you on the Scotty in the tube scene. Waste of time).
    Romulus is still there in this reality and with an important member of the Federation seriously crippled, I'm willing to bet that the Romulans aren't going to sit around chating about the weather, especially assuming that in this reality, a war against the Romulans has already taken place too.
    At least that's one of the things we could see in the next movie.
  9. suarezguy

    suarezguy Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Jun 9, 2008
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    They had a conference room in WNMHGB though; Kirk needed to argue on the bridge the first time but on other occasions it seemed that would have been a much better place to air differences.

    Sarek telling young Spock he could choose either path was different but OK; his later-on telling Spock that he could feel/use some emotions (when the specific emotion that was being discussed was choke-inducing rage) was too much; there weren't ideas or character developments other than Spock growing more comfortable with the bitterness.
    Kirk leaping from finishing training to captaincy in one mission, over those who had worked for a good deal longer, also felt like a betrayal of how orderly, fair and professional Starfleet should be.

    The idea of Spock growing more human over time is interesting but I thought Nimoy took it too far, he seemed to be having too much fun aside from the very-in-character "my planet has just been destroyed ..." line. I haven't seen "Unification" in a long time, but I think his ease in TUC was just with that particular crew; even though he's addressing younger versions of Kirk and himself in this film, it didn't work.

    I also mistakenly thought Delta Vega was Ilia's homeworld.

    OTOH, I thought Saldana and Quinto had good chemistry and I enjoyed Kirk's surprise/jealousy.
    Last edited: May 22, 2009
  10. elwappo

    elwappo Cadet Newbie

    May 12, 2009
    The only reason I quote this is because after seeing the new movie I have gone back and started watching my TOS DvD's again. Most of the episodes in the second season are very much like this movie. Serious situation perhaps, but isn't someone coming to destory your planet serious?

    Just go watch Shore Leave. It is a great example of how I think they captured the characters essence in this new movie.
  11. pookha

    pookha Admiral Admiral

    Dec 26, 2002
    one of the worst was in the changling when a whole system was destroyed but at the end they were yucking it up.
    at least in the movie things were more subtle.

    spocks wit especially directed at kirk was there pretty early on..

    from corbomite manauver

  12. Lynn Minmay

    Lynn Minmay Captain Captain

    Jun 1, 2002
    SDF-1 Macross
    This movie has surpassed all my expectations.

    Star Trek (2009) is now the benchmark for all movies to follow.

    But TWOK and FC are following very closely behind.
  13. drmick

    drmick Lieutenant Red Shirt

    May 23, 2009
    I finally saw this. I used to be a huge Star Tre fan before Rick Berman and Brannon Braga slowly destroyed the franchise with Voyager and Enterprise.

    First of al, I loved Chekov and Scotty. Kirk, McCoy, Sulu and especially Spock were also excellent.

    But I really did not like this film. Due to holidays I was delayed in getting to see it, and was doing my best to avoid spoilers on the web, but where it was referenced on all sorts of forums, the overall consensus was that it was, at the very least, very good, if not, in fact, excellent.

    With this sort of anticipation, I was then HUGELY disappointed. While each performance was great, and the production values were high, the whole plot was lazy and contrived. Nero was a hugely pointless villain.

    My synopsis of the film is as thus:

    In the TNG future, a star close to Romulus is about to go nova. I'm not an astrophysicist but I'm pretty sure that it would be quite obvious for THOUSANDS of years that the star was about to go nova, long before the original Vulcans settled there.

    Anyway, rather than get the brightest minds that both the Federation and Romulus have to solve the problem they get one man, a pretty old one at that, to sort the problem. Maybe evacuating the planet might have been a useful precaution? And since the Romulan Star Empire use quantum singularities (mini black holes) to power their ships why the hell do they need Federation sourced red matter?

    Spock was obviously having an afternoon nap, or troubled with intractable prostatism because he was bit late injecting the red matter. Romulus got destroyed, but what the heck, let's inject that stuff anyway. (Given that Spock was living on Romulus by the time of the TNG era I'm wondering if he got really pissed off and let the planet get destroyed).

    Nero was obviously watching nearby, rather than actually going to rescue his wife (who appeared human). Presumably as a miner, he was part of some sort of trade union that prevented him doing rescue work, as that's not part of his contract. He watches his planet and pregnant wife get fried and he's a pit pissed.

    Both Spock and the Nerada get pulled into a black hole, which rather than crushing them to a microscopic pea pulls them back in time. The first thing Nero sees on going through the singularity is an ancient (to him) Starfleet vessel. He opens fire but rather than destroying it completely and getting on with the mission of finding Spock (who was just nearby a moment ago) asks their captain to come over for tea and scones.

    Then he spends the next 25 years waiting for Spock to come through the anomaly. Hello? How long would you wait? I'd give up after a day or two. Anyhow, the rest of Nero's crew, who I assume also should be part of a miner trade union go along with this. As opposed to going home, betting on the Romulan Superbowl and marrying their grandmothers.

    Spock eventually comes through. Kill him after all this time? Nah. Why not just put him on Vulcan's nearbying planet, a stones throw from a Starfleet base and let him watch his planet die from having a black hole at its core. Presumambly this planet doesn't rotate on its own axis so as to guarantee that Spock would actually not be on the WRONG side of the planet when Vulcan croaked.

    On Vulcan, their greatest minds are standing in a crumbling cave, meditating and thinking about to have for dinner, while their planet starts to disintegrate.

    Meanwhile back on Earth the brand new flagship is launched with a crew of mostly cadets? A 3rd year (not FINAL year) student is made the 1st Officer when Pike goes over for tea and scones. Hellllloooooo? Where are all the officers? Heck, where are all the crew who actually have trained to run the ship?

    Back at Hoth, future Spock risks the fate of the entire federation just so that his past younger self (who now constitutes a significant proportion of the Vulcan race) can get a bit of experience of dealing with humans on a day to day basis.

    And isn't convenient that Scotty, who has yet to actually prove he is a genius other than copying some future Vulcan, just happens to be next door?

    The Trek rules of time travel are thrown out the window in this one, in that most other time travel plots always involve the same timeline. Alternate realities do exist in the Trek universe, but once their residents cross over into our universe, it usually means its curtains for them (e.g. "Parallels" characters, Enterprise C crew and the alternate Miles O'Brien from "Visionary").

    Back at the final fight the Nerada gets a full dose of red matter. A drop of this stuff can destroy a planet, but the whole lot just makes you get stuck in first gear. Kirk offers to help, Nero politely refuses so Kirk massacres them in a move akin to German fighter planes raking the cold and wet Titanic survivors with bullets a la Pearl Harbor.

    In fact, rather than back away first and just drop some torpedoes into the gravity well, he flies TOWARDS the Nerada and the black hole to kill them!!!???!!!!

    For this genocidal act Kirk gets promoted to CAPTAIN straight from third year!!!!! No final year, no ensign, no Lietenant j.g., no lietenant, no lietenant commander, no commander. Nope, staright to captain. Of the flagship of the fleet. In what reality or career would this ever happen?

    Hmmm..... I think that's me done. This film wasn't a patch on First Contact, and I appreciate I'm in the minority on this one, wasn't a patch on Nemesis.

    I can't believe I'm the only Trekkie to feel this way, but I'm not prepared at this late stage to sift through thousands of posts to find out.

    Three of my friends who are casual Trekkies seemed to really like it. My wife, a big Star Wars fan, who hates Trek came out fuming because se was promised a film that would convert her. It didn't. She still hates all Star Trek. With that straw poll, I'm not sure what this film has actually achieved other than pissing off the die-hards, bringing in the casuals, and not making any difference to the haters.

    And it annoys me that TNG and DS9 have been essentially wiped from existence, but the woeful Enterprise is left intact.
  14. Ovation

    Ovation Vice Admiral Admiral

    Stick around and you'll find that most "die-hards" (I consider anyone who has watched all iterations of Trek multiple times, particularly if they've been watching it since the 70s (or before) to be "die-hards) actually quite enjoyed the movie (I'm one of them, BTW--been watching since 1973). And the story on screen quite clearly shows that neither TNG nor DS9 have been "wiped from existence". The new timeline is parallel to, not overwriting, the "prime timeline".

    I will not try to dissuade you from your dislike of the film (you are free to like or dislike it as you wish) but do not assume that only "casuals" like the film (not true) and that all of TNG etc. is "overwritten" (also not true).
  15. startrekwatcher

    startrekwatcher Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Jun 9, 2007
    I actually thought they were gathered there absorbing the katras of the greatest minds of Vulcan from the various katric arks stored in the ancient chamber before they were destroyed. Now, all that knowledge about science, mysticism, history can be used to rebuild their civilization.
  16. drmick

    drmick Lieutenant Red Shirt

    May 23, 2009
    I'm aware of the alternate reality thing. But in JJ's Star Trek reality they have been removed from future existence (although a TNG era mirror universe style alternate reality story would be interesting with the TNG/DS9 cast).

    Is there a thread where those who didn't like it can congregate? Because right now I feel like I'm the last Trekkie in an Invasion of the Bodysnatchers type conspiracy.
  17. indranee

    indranee Vice Admiral Admiral

    Nov 20, 2003
    you actually sound (in this review, at least) like a casual Trekkie. I say this because you give no indication that you KNOW Trek. I may be wrong but that's the impression I get. the interesting thing is that most casual Trekkies I know loved it. they didn't find the nitpicks you found (i.e., old Vulcans "standing around contemplating dinner" :lol: they were obviously doing something else -- something that any dyed-in-the-wool Trekkie would know instantly, just as Spock did) and enjoyed the movie as it was bascially meant to be -- a fun, rollicking sci fi romp.

    as for the diehards like yours truly -- it depends. I, for one, loved it.
  18. skynet1701

    skynet1701 Cadet Newbie

    May 12, 2009

    just watched the film, couldnt wait for it to end.

    The comedy wasnt funny, the character relationships were silly (spock & uhura? nah), the whole alternate timeline idea was crap.

    i just didnt like it. maybe i should see it again to make sure.

    What about small continuity mistakes? arrowhead design on the crew uniforms of the uss kelvin....ufp logo as it is in tng etc....

    come on writers/ some research and dont give me the alternate timeline excuse
  19. drmick

    drmick Lieutenant Red Shirt

    May 23, 2009
    Er, there's a fair amount of sarcasm in my post. Trust me, when I say do KNOW Star Trek (in terms of actual factual recall). But perhaps I don't GET it, maybe.
  20. indranee

    indranee Vice Admiral Admiral

    Nov 20, 2003
    you should stop feeling sorry for yourself then. it's a free forum. post as you feel. no one can stop you. but if people come in and refute your (many and porous) points up there, the last thing they expect you to do is go home crying.

    be an adult. stand yer ground ;)