Not sure if serious?
Archer = daddy built the Enterprise's engine.
Kirk = daddy was a hero.
Well yeah. Kirk got his position through hard graft and exceptional performance. Doesn’t matter who his dad was.
I can’t speak for Archer because I didn’t follow Enterprise as closely.
But it seems odd that the federation would allow nepotism in its institutions. I could be wrong, but wasn’t the Warp Five Programme state sponsored? Is there no accountability in the government?
Maybe the conversation went like this:
‘So we’ve got this new super fast ship and it needs a Captain to explore the sector, make first contact and blow Earth’s friendly trumpet, shall we give it to someone deserving, and with exceptional experience and talent?’
‘Nah, we’ll give it to that scientist guy’s kid’
‘But why?’
‘He’d probably appreciate the gesture, is all’
‘I suppose he would, but wouldn’t that undermine the trust in the decision process and decision makers, and devalue the efforts of everyone in Star Fleet? I mean, it’s not like these people get paid for their sacrifice.’
‘Maybe, but what can they do about it, it’s not like we’re a free enlightened egalitarian democracy. Sod the plebs.’
It just doesn’t fit the narrative. Unless the federation is a lie, which it probably is.