• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Librarians season 2 starts tomorrow.

JanewayRulz!

Vice Admiral
Admiral
I'm excited. I never watched the TV movies, but I loved season 1 last year, and I've been waiting all year for it to return.
 
They're currently doing a marathon of season 1. But I'm too busy to watch it today, and my plans to binge it on Hulu last week were scuttled by the computer problems I'm having. (On Demand only had the last half-season and the dreadful movies.)
 
Given the uneven nature of the series, I think the movies are just as good as always.
 
Currently watching the repeat of last season's finale, to get primed for tomorrow. The show's a lot of fun and I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up with this year.
 
I've been counting down the days since they announced the premiere date. I loved Season 1. I'm a huge fan of Warehouse 13 and Eureka, and this felt like a perfect replacement for them.
 
Pretty good premiere 2-parter. It's appropriate that the Librarians are facing foes who are characters from literature. And I like how literate it was, with the characters showing off their knowledge of the stories and attributes of literary characters, quoting Shakespeare and Frankenstein and the like. It finally feels like a show about librarians.

Although I'm underwhelmed by the actor playing Prospero, Richard Cox. He doesn't have the necessary Shakespearean grandeur, and his accent is too American. (And I'm proud of myself for figuring out it was Prospero before they said so.) Their Moriarty, David S. Lee, is better, although he didn't look the part (Moriarty was described in The Valley of Fear as having a thin face and gray hair). Not surprisingly, both actors have played villains in John Rogers's previous series, Leverage.

Noah Wyle wasn't quite as annoying as he was in the movies and the first season, but I'm still glad they contrived for him to go off on his own quest so the show can focus on its own leads.
 
I liked the premiere a lot. It was fun, and I liked the literary characters (although I know literally nothing about Prospero that wasn't stated in the episodes). I hope we see Frankenstein (I'm not calling him "Frankenstein's Monster") again, it was interesting to see a version that wasn't like the classic movie version.

Moriarty wasn't exactly like I would have expected, but I thought he was well written and the actor did a good job. I liked Flynn well enough, but I am glad he's not the main character of the series, since I like the other Librarians more. I think this season will probably be as good as season 1, if not better.
 
It was a lot of fun. Prospero is a fun villain, and I love the idea of them fighting fictional characters. The bit with Frankenstein's Monster cracked me up. I'm liking Moriarty a lot too.
I can't wait to see what other fictionals pop up as the season goes on. Hopefully we'll get some good guys too.
They do seem to have toned down Finn a bit.
So is The Annex connected to The Library, or is it just a part of it that looks like The Annex?
 
Flynn still bugs the heck out of me, as does the Eve/Flynn dynamic. :rolleyes:

There was way more chemistry between the Italian and Cassandra than those two. :vulcan:

Heck, there's more between Jenkins and Ezekiel than those two! :rommie:
 
Flynn still bugs the heck out of me, as does the Eve/Flynn dynamic. :rolleyes:

There was way more chemistry between the Italian and Cassandra than those two. :vulcan:

Heck, there's more between Jenkins and Ezekiel than those two! :rommie:

I wouldn't go as far as that, but yes I do feel the chemistry between the cast is a little... wonky. Its almost as if they were acting out their scenes alone.
 
You know I think I've finally nailed down what The Librarians are; a standard D&D adventuring party. You've got Ezekiel the halfling Thief, Cassandra the Sorceress, Stone the grumpy Dwarf fighter and Baird is the Knight protector. The only member in the group is lacking is a Cleric.

Fun episode tonight. I particularly liked the teenager who thought that all colleges experience mysterious deaths and disappearances as a matter of course. (Clearly, she must have attended Sunnydale High at some point.)

But . . . Stumpy!

And this is where I shamelessly brag about how I'm currently hard at work on a LIBRARIANS tie-in novel.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/bookmark/tnts-librarians-gets-book-spinoff-835488

Cool, I'm always looking forward to a book of yours.
 
Fun episode tonight. I particularly liked the teenager who thought that all colleges experience mysterious deaths and disappearances as a matter of course. (Clearly, she must have attended Sunnydale High at some point.)

Plus we got Leverage's Beth Riesgraf as the Lady of the Lake (or one of them, I guess), in what I assume will be a recurring role. Which now makes two Leverage regulars who've appeared in the show, since Christian Kane has been a lead in both.

I couldn't fully enjoy the Stumpy gag, because the gargoyle prop was so incredibly crude. The art department rather dropped the ball there. (By the way, it wasn't technically a gargoyle, because it wasn't a drainspout. "Gargoyle" comes from the Middle French word for "throat," which is also the root of "gargle." The proper term for an animal or creature statue that doesn't serve as a drainspout would be a "grotesque.")

I liked the running gag of the cheerleader who assumed that the weird disappearances and curses that plagued the university were normal at any college. And I like it that, conversely, they addressed the idea that hiding magic is an unviable strategy now that magic is active in the wider world. Hopefully that's the beginning of an arc. Too many shows cling to the secrecy trope to preserve the conceit that they're happening in the real world, but it too often traps the narrative within the limits of cliche or leads to illogical or self-defeating consequences. For instance, in the '88 War of the Worlds: The Series, the government-backed heroes deliberately endangered the public and made their own jobs much harder by not telling people that there were murderous (alien) terrorists in their midst who could be easily recognized by their decaying appearance and tendency to congregate in threes and make strange noises. When has the public ever been kept safe from an ongoing, active threat to their lives by not being told that it exists and they should be alert for it?

By the same token, if magic is an ongoing threat to people's lives, then keeping it secret is just going to get more people killed because they don't know what to watch out for and what to avoid. So if the Librarians don't go public at some point, they'll be responsible for a lot of civilian deaths they could've avoided. Heck, they already are.

Which is just one reason I'm so sick of the "secret conflict behind the scenes of our everyday world" trope. What's the point of pretending it's happening in the real world when it obviously isn't because we're watching it on TV?


You know I think I've finally nailed down what The Librarians are; a standard D&D adventuring party. You've got Ezekiel the halfling Thief, Cassandra the Sorceress, Stone the grumpy Dwarf fighter and Baird is the Knight protector. The only member in the group is lacking is a Cleric.

Isn't that Jenkins?
 
Jenkins was my first thought for Cleric too.
I watched last week's and the new one yesterday. I like Stone, so I enjoyed getting a big character development episode for him in last week's.
The college one was a lot of fun. The Ladies of the Lake thing was definitely an interesting set up. Stone fanboying out over the professor was funny. The bit with Ezekiel being as egotistical as possible cracked me up.
I like the bit about it getting harder to keep magic secret too. It tends to bug me in these kinds of shows when there's tons of weird stuff going on constantly, but nobody seems to notice except the people directly involved in the story. Even if they don't do much more with it, at least they did acknowledge that that might not always be the case here.
 
I'm having an oddly hard time keeping the character names straight here. I keep thinking that Ezekiel's last name is Stone. I can't even remember his actual last name. (Looks it up) Oh, it's Ezekiel Jones. Jones and Stone? No wonder I'm confused. (And apparently there was an Ezekiel Stone who was the lead character of an old fantasy show called Brimstone, but I never watched that, so that can't be it.)
 
I'm not sure I would've recognized Riesgraf if the show hadn't been teasing a very special visitor from LEVERAGE on its Facebook page. (I was half-expecting Professor Bancroft to be played by Timothy Hutton.)

I'm in the process of trying to memorize how the various characters address each other. Baird is almost always "Colonel" or "Baird," but Flynn is generally addressed as "Flynn," not "Carsen," and so on. Stone is usually "Stone," but Jones can be either "Jones" or "Ezekiel," depending.

And Jenkins tends to use formal addresses "Mister Stone," "Miss Cillian," with rare exceptions, like when he actually addressed Cassandra as "Cassandra" during their heart-to-heart last night.
 
I'm not sure I would've recognized Riesgraf if the show hadn't been teasing a very special visitor from LEVERAGE on its Facebook page.

Oh, I recognized her immediately once she showed up, but then, I just finished a Leverage rewatch a few weeks ago. But I saw her name in the credits, so I was going through the whole episode trying to peer beneath Lucy's glasses and thinking, "Is that Parker? She sounds a bit like Parker, but I'm not sure." In retrospect, she was rather too young, but I'm not that great with faces, so changing someone's hair and putting glasses on them can make it hard for me to recognize them. Still, when Riesgraf showed up under the Lake, I immediately went, "Ohhh, that's Parker!"


I'm in the process of trying to memorize how the various characters address each other. Baird is almost always "Colonel" or "Baird," but Flynn is generally addressed as "Flynn," not "Carsen," and so on. Stone is usually "Stone," but Jones can be either "Jones" or "Ezekiel," depending.

And Jenkins tends to use formal addresses "Mister Stone," "Miss Cillian," with rare exceptions, like when he actually addressed Cassandra as "Cassandra" during their heart-to-heart last night.

I'm still struggling with the idea that her surname is spelled "Cillian" instead of "Killian." C before I is normally soft.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top