• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Intersection of Canon and the Prime Timeline

So, which of these applies to you?!

  • Discovery is canon and it takes place in the prime timeline

    Votes: 35 45.5%
  • Discovery is canon and takes place in the Kelvin timeline

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Discovery is canon and takes place in another universe that we have never seen before

    Votes: 23 29.9%
  • Discovery is canon and takes place in another unvierse that we have seen before (if so, which?)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Discovery is non-canon and therefore doesn't take place in any universe in the Star Trek multiverse

    Votes: 5 6.5%
  • I don't care about canon

    Votes: 14 18.2%

  • Total voters
    77
I... wait...

*does sums*

My theory makes no sense haha! You’re completely right
Well, at least I got one Math thing right!

Unless the point of divergence of the YE timeline had its origins in the temporal cold war events in “Enterprise” meaning that if TOS happened, the Enterprise C would have been sacrificed at narendra III. But... because of the TCW the Enterprise C disappeared at narendra III and the war with the Klingons raged on from the 2340s because L’Rell was useless and easily overthrown meaning that more warlike Klingons led the empire (despite Burnham insisting that the Klingons had “made their way out of darkness into the light” - or words to that effect - I forget exactly what Michael soliloquised in the s1 finale) and they wanted to reconquer the federation since they came so very (ridiculously, hilariously) close in s1 of DSC.

But it’s ok cos Tasha is alive and Troi is nowhere to be found...
As long as Tasha lives I'm fine with the timeline explanation...
 
I go canon in prime timeline... but I've long thought of TOS as only semi-canon anyway *ducks*.

But seriously, I decided in my teens (having already seen lots of TOS before TNG started in the UK) that TOS might be the spirit of Trek, but large portions of it needed to be ignored as "apocrypha" in order for it to make sense as one timeline. Including much of the design aesthetic. To me, everything TMP onwards really pushed TOS visuals into the category of "vague approximation of what it was always meant to look like".
 
ducks-large.jpg
 
Canon. Existing in its own timeline.
Will it still be canon if they hit the reset button at series finale? I supposed it will be canon, in the sense that the show existed. But if timeline is wiped out, it won’t have any bearing on rest of Star Trek.
 
Well the Kelvin Timeline is canon but has no baring on anything Prime

Well other then Romulus blowing up and Spock crossing over, but that would only effect any story that takes place after that year.
 
Canon is not the same as consistency. In the history of works considered canon with each other, rarely if ever do the individual pieces have much consistency with each other. In fact, Trek has had remarkable consistency in general premises, if not in the specific technologies of the week etc. Until DSC, which has canon connections (Sarek, etc), but no consistency with prior Trek. That said, I don't care if it's canon or consistent, I'd just like it to be good.
 
Canon, takes place in Prime Timeline. It's what I'm going with. How everything fits around it and whatever we want to call everything else, we can debate, though I don't feel like debating it at the current moment.
 
I go canon in prime timeline... but I've long thought of TOS as only semi-canon anyway *ducks*.

But seriously, I decided in my teens (having already seen lots of TOS before TNG started in the UK) that TOS might be the spirit of Trek, but large portions of it needed to be ignored as "apocrypha" in order for it to make sense as one timeline. Including much of the design aesthetic. To me, everything TMP onwards really pushed TOS visuals into the category of "vague approximation of what it was always meant to look like".

This was me as a young trek fan as well, having the Trek encyclopedia and chronology and just seeing how much contradictory information in both made me realise not everything fits.

Discovery is prime timeline, but i honestly wouldn't care if it wasn't either.
 
I also don't care.

It's another "version" of Trek, just like TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT, and the various movies. They are different takes on the general concept.

Kor
 
It has a lot of consistency. It isn't perfect, but it isn't completely absent.
Depends on where your baseline is. If we are talking superficial details and general concepts, then sure. Beyond that, not so much. I'm not saying that's a bad thing.
 
Well the Kelvin Timeline is canon but has no baring on anything Prime

Well other then Romulus blowing up and Spock crossing over, but that would only effect any story that takes place after that year.
Since CBS can't touch anything from the Kelvin movies, I'm curious how they'll deal with Romulus should the Picard series (or anything post-2387) happen.

It's always possible they'll just ignore it. The fandom will just love that:lol:
 
It's like the Romulans are causing problems no matter where you go. Causing issues if they show up in DSC, causing issues if they show up the Picard Series...

... almost like a Romulan Plot to screw over the writers. :vulcan:
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top