By definition, alteration is a deliberate act. Mutation on the other is down to random chance. By inference, her being female was either not an intended outcome, or done to hide her nature from the Republic/Empire by having her in plain sight.They had to remove one y chromosome and replace it with an x chromosome. You can't just deactivate an y chromosome and get a female living being. And just adding an x chromosome (xxy) would result in the klinefelter syndrome.
These are all alterations to the genetic code. So therefore she can't be an unaltered clone by definition.
Regardless, the salient point is that she doesn't have the altered docility, accelerated aging, or the implanted control chip (nor the further alterations presumably required for interfacing), leaving all of the genotype's autosomes intact and stable.
Fiddling around with the allosomes is trivial compared to attempting to reverse engineer the original sequencing from radically altered clone progeny. It'd be like trying to unscramble eggs.
Last edited: