Also just finished this. I'd rank it my third most enjoyed out of the four, with
RBoE at the top, followed by
ZSG, followed by
PoD, and
StF at the bottom. Yikes, that one was rough going.
I tended to hurry through Shar's scenes in Mission: Gamma. Speaking of which, was he this aggressive in the DS9 books? I remember him as a mopey kid.
I didn't really see him as especially aggressive, or at least, no more than he usually was in DS9. He always had the mopey-but-could-snap-if-provoked thing going on.
I have to say, though, that Shar really didn't have a great deal to do in the story, especially considering he was on the cover. His function was basically just to say, "Hi, here's what I've been up to," and support the more active and decisive characters. He didn't really seem to do much. But then I guess you could say, what could he do from the position he was in? Considering the scale of the issues, probably not much.
No his presence on the cover was mostly to excite the DS9-R readers and make it obvious to others that this story would involve Andor even if they didn't recognize the individual character. Much like Tuvok's appearance on the cover of
Seize the Fire was so that potential readers would say, "Hey look, there's a guy from TNG and a guy from VOY on that cover. I like both of those. I should read that book," even if Tuvok himself wasn't a focus of the book. Sales-based decisions don't always coincide with story-based decisions. Damn, I can waffle tonight.
Regardless of the optimism/pessimism discussion, I think it's hard to deny that this book is a perfectly logical outgrowth of Vanguard, Destiny, and the DS9-Relaunch Andor storylines; I think it was brilliant, how it incorporated all those elements without requiring reading any of them to understand what was going on.
That's one of my favourite parts of the ST-lit experience, so yes, I'm also glad it featured so well here.
But on the other hand, I can also empathise with the point of view that says such cross-pollination tends to lead to the various lines becoming ill-defined and all of a mush.
So basically, swings and roundabouts.
Seemed to have a few places where the editing could have been better: particularly at least one or two spots where a line of dialogue gets rather implausibly repeated.
That is something that seems to be creeping into the novels more and more lately. Like, for example, Konya becoming a human for a paragraph, as already mentioned. At the top of the book, a shen was referred to as a he, which defies convention. Keru had lost his partner to the Borg, not the Gorn. Cethente's name was spelled wrong and a character changed names mid-scene in
Sword of Damocles. Things like that.
Obviously I understand that things slip through the cracks, especially in a time of editorial uncertainty such as Pocket has endured, and if one person is now doing the job that used to belong to two or three, these things will happen. We're probably lucky they don't happen more than they do. But still, it jumps out when it does happen.
Did anybody else notice that in this novel, Andor seems to be, in large part, a metaphor for current American politics?
Very much so, and it was disturbingly effective. I lived in the US for 8 years, then lost my visa. I went through quite some trials to try to return to the US. Now, looking at the political situation, I'm glad I'm not there, and I don't intend to put any effort into trying to return. That place scares me. While some aspects of the political and social situation in the US are progressing quite nicely, the hysterical response that this victory of common sense has engendered seems worse than ever.
But that's another tangent.
One thing I was thrilled by was Shar finally saying what I'd been dying to smack into them for the whole book:
"Did it never occur to you that Uzaveh may have already shown us the way to save ourselves, rather than sit around and wait for salvation to be handed to us?"
As a resolutely non-spiritual person, I despise when people use "God" as some catch-all excuse for their behaviour (see above re: American politics). Not only saying that "God will save us" but actively working against anyone else trying to save us is the most contemptible and self-destructive bollocks. IF there is a God (and I really don't care one way or the other whether there is or there isn't), then he "saves us" by giving us the intelligence and imagination to solve our own problems, not just sit on our laurels and expect divine intervention. Human(oid) inventiveness IS divine intervention.
So apparently, this novel stirred more in me than I thought it did.