But was Dean Cain a good Superman that is the question. I never took much notice of Lois & Clark when it was on TV
But was Dean Cain a good Superman that is the question. I never took much notice of Lois & Clark when it was on TV
Putting aside what a monumental asshat Cain is IRL and focusing solely on his performance on the show, he was a terrific and hugely appealing Clark Kent, and an adequate Superman. But on L&C, Clark was the more important persona anyway. I liked him a lot.But was Dean Cain a good Superman that is the question. I never took much notice of Lois & Clark when it was on TV
Putting aside what a monumental asshat Cain is IRL and focusing solely on his performance on the show, he was a terrific and hugely appealing Clark Kent, and an adequate Superman. But on L&C, Clark was the more important persona anyway. I liked him a lot.
Should I give this show a try if I can find it on streaming? I never really cared for it when it was brand new, or watched repeats after it had finished.
Should I give this show a try if I can find it on streaming? I never really cared for it when it was brand new, or watched repeats after it had finished.
I'd say absolutely yes. There is a diminishing returns factor as the show goes along, however -- the first season is by far its best. It's never without its pleasures, though. I offered a sort of capsule series overview uptopic, so I'll just quote myself here:Should I give this show a try if I can find it on streaming? I never really cared for it when it was brand new, or watched repeats after it had finished.
(I'll add that, as I near the end of my epic Smallville rewatch, I'm not sure but that I don't prefer L&C. Smallville's first three seasons are great, a total blast, but like L&C, diminishing returns then set in -- and Smallville's go on a lot longer.)Ultimately, it’s perhaps my least favorite Superman TV series, but that’s like calling it my least favorite pizza.Its main fault is leaning a bit too hard into unfunny camp and silliness at a few points in its later seasons; few things are more painful than failed comedy. But when it's good, it's very good: romantic, sexy, sentimental, witty, and charming.
The first season is the best, and features John Shea’s wonderful turn as Lex Luthor. Dean Cain is a great Clark, though less convincing as Superman. Hatcher is a funny, frenetic force as Lois, although her characterization is a little neurotic for my taste, the better to fit the template of a rom-com heroine. And Lane Smith is a terrific Perry White, reimagined as having a quirky obsession with Elvis Presley (with the traditional “Great Caesar’s ghost!” replaced by “Great shades of Elvis!”).
I'd say absolutely yes. There is a diminishing returns factor as the show goes along, however -- the first season is by far its best. It's never without its pleasures, though. I offered a sort of capsule series overview uptopic, so I'll just quote myself here:
(I'll add that, as I near the end of my epic Smallville rewatch, I'm not sure but that I don't prefer L&C. Smallville's first three seasons are great, a total blast, but like L&C, diminishing returns then set in -- and Smallville's go on a lot longer.)
But was Dean Cain a good Superman that is the question. I never took much notice of Lois & Clark when it was on TV
That's what I've always said when people ask "Which is the real him, Superman or Clark Kent?" ...neither. The real him was the Clark that grew up in Smallville. The Metropolis Clark and Superman are both an act. (This applies to the Reeve movies, not necessarily any other version.)
There is no difference between Cain's Superman and Cain's Clark.
I see this as a flaw.
Chris Reeve made his Clark a nerd and his Superman is a BoyScout Master, and when Lois found out who he was, he played a third character who was a 30 year old virgin... Until he wasn't.
This is definitely an … interesting take.Lois and Clark is 10 times better than Superman & Lois, and if Lois and Clark had had Superman & Lois' budget, every episode of Lois and Clark would have been more mind blowing than the entire Matrix Trilogy.
I never liked Chris Reeve's take on Clark Kent, even when I was a kid. I thought it was exaggerated, unnecessary and irritating. Not even George Reeves or any other actor who portrayed Superman/Clark Kent went to that extreme.
Eh, Reeve was 100 percent great, including his Clark. Mind you, I personally prefer a less exaggerated take, more “Clark is the real guy” a la Dean Cain. But Reeve did what he did and did it superbly, and it worked brilliantly in the context of those films.
There is no difference between Cain's Superman and Cain's Clark.
I see this as a flaw.
Hatcher's Lois was a regionalist.
(Durant too.)
She believed that anyone from a fly over state was a mouthbreathing third class citizen, which is why her minds eye of Clark never matched up with who she thought Superman was.
Lois and Clark is 10 times better than Superman & Lois, and if Lois and Clark had had Superman & Lois' budget, every episode of Lois and Clark would have been more mind blowing than the entire Matrix Trilogy.
I never liked Chris Reeve's take on Clark Kent, even when I was a kid. I thought it was exaggerated, unnecessary and irritating. Not even George Reeves or any other actor who portrayed Superman/Clark Kent went to that extreme.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.