• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Superman

Yes, they took the character back in a darker direction, but even then they didn't go all the way back to the very first appearances of the character. They still kept the influences and changes that had been since he first appeared.

Indeed. O'Neil's Batman was grim and obsessed but aware of his obsession, occasionally regretful over it and often very humanistic when events warranted.
 
No...and no. The "happy hopeful" Superman you refer to was a deviation in the incompetent hands of Weisinger (particularly post 1946) from the original portrayal of the character in the comics, who often behaved like a vigilante,...

"30s viigilante Superman" was, in many ways, a smiling, hopeful, character. Yes, his politics were more in line with Roosevelt than Eisenhower, but he was still doing "good:" razing (and rebuilding) slums and rescuing people from death row, usually with a grin on his face and a quip at the ready. He wasn't glowering and snapping necks.
 
It isn't, though. In fact, Wonder Woman comics are so popular, it went twice-a-month for several recent years, and DC keeps churning out several one-shots and mini-series starring Wonder Woman (plus one current spin-off mini-series "Nubia & the Amazons", which introduced trans-women Amazons btw) in addition to the regular title.

What are the sales figures these days compared to, say, ten or twenty years ago?
 
I bet some in this thread don't believe homo sapiens are where humans are supposed to be now. That TRUE humans were and will always be australopithecus. Everything after that is just nonsense and not what true humans are. We're wrong for believing otherwise.
 
"30s viigilante Superman" was, in many ways, a smiling, hopeful, character. Yes, his politics were more in line with Roosevelt than Eisenhower, but he was still doing "good:" razing (and rebuilding) slums and rescuing people from death row, usually with a grin on his face and a quip at the ready. He wasn't glowering and snapping necks.

Early Superman killed villains, and not through accidents. He tossed a plane with criminals into the ground to explode, mocked criminals fate as they were driving over a cliff, etc. (some time ago, I posted examples of this kind of early Superman behavior on this board), and was nothing less than judge, jury and executioner. He was very much a product of the pro-vigilante American culture of that period.

He's had a child sidekick/sidekicks for the vast majority of his history (including the current comics).

Late 60s Batman readers did not want Robin around, except in brief cameos, which is why at the same time Grayson was sent off to college (Batman #217 from December of 1969), he had his own, college-oriented stories in Detective Comics, giving fans the return of the solo, dark Batman they wanted for so long.
 
What are the sales figures these days compared to, say, ten or twenty years ago?
Latest comparable figures I have is for September 2021.

In September 2021, issue #779 of the monthly WW title sold an est. 30,000 units, with another 18,000 units sold for issue #4 of the miniseries "Wonder Woman: Black & Gold", as well as 17,000 units of issue #7 of "Sensational Wonder Woman". Combined, 65,000 units of new Wonder Woman comics were sold.

In September 2011, issue #1 of the monthly WW title sold 76,214 units. Of course, this was the launch of the New52, and there was a special hype surrounding all DC titles that month. For context, the preceding month of August 2011 had issue #614 of WW sell 29,223 units, with another 29,492 units sold for #3 of the event tie-in miniseries "Flashpoint: Wonder Woman & the Furies", as well as 10,079 units of the one-shot "DC Retroactive: Wonder Woman in the 80s" and 9,290 units of "DC Retroactive: Wonder Woman in the 90s". Combined, 78084 units of new Wonder Woman comics were sold in August '11, though comparing those numbers among themselves, it appears to me the Flashpoint event tie-in factored heavily into the sales of WW & the Furies.

In September 2001, "Wonder Woman" #174 sold 32,221 units, being the sole WW title of the month.

So, compared to ten years ago, the regular Wonder Woman title sells about the same, considering the hype and high sales of the early New52 issues as an extraordinary event, while the character does not need to rely on event tie-ins to sell more units of miniseries. Considering that digital sales are not included, the regular WW title is selling at least as good as twenty years ago, while the character apparently not being popular enough to sell miniseries or oneshot titles.
 
So, all WW titles combined are selling less than a single title ten years ago. That's not good.

Again, the September 2011 issue was a much-hyped reboot starting with a new #1, which of course sold way better than a #779 that's mid-story would. Which is why I gave the August 2011 sales figures for context. For further context, the hype of the reboot did not last, as by #23 in August 2013 (so about two years later), sales were down to 34,747 units again, with no other WW title that month.

For a better comparison to the #1 of 2011, January 2020 saw the anniversary issue #750, which took the number one spot in the sales charts that month and sold 167,377 units, about double the New52 launch, despite a $9.99 cover price.

So I would not worry about the sales of Wonder Woman comics too much. They're just fine.
 
Interesting. I started reading Batman in the late 60s (or, more accurately, having it read to me) and I liked both stories with and without Robin.

At the time, readers associated Robin with the image of the character from the TV series, which did not sit right with fans wanting Batman to return to his darker roots. Separating the two characters worked well for Robin, as it gave him independence to grow as his own hero while in college, and the concurrent Teen Titans stories had the group deal with issues (e.g., campus protests, being complicit in a death, etc.,) they would never experience during their "the teen sidekicks of..." days just a few years earlier.
 
At the time, readers associated Robin with the image of the character from the TV series

No they didn't, readers were smart enough to separate the two, just as they did with the cartoon version of Aquaman and the comics version later on.

Non fans had the trouble with this. And many writers. But fans of the comic were fine.
 
No they didn't, readers were smart enough to separate the two, just as they did with the cartoon version of Aquaman and the comics version later on.

Wrong. Letters pages were filled with readers complaining that the comic version of Robin was taking on traits from that TV series, including the "holy-ims" made (in)famous by the Dozier TV show. This is one of the reasons Batman readers so desperately wanted him as far away from Batman as possible.
 
One of my favourite jokes in Batman Forever:

“Holy rusted metal, Batman!”
“What?”
“The island’s made of metal. And it’s rusted and full of holes.”
 
At the time, readers associated Robin with the image of the character from the TV series, which did not sit right with fans wanting Batman to return to his darker roots. Separating the two characters worked well for Robin, as it gave him independence to grow as his own hero while in college, and the concurrent Teen Titans stories had the group deal with issues (e.g., campus protests, being complicit in a death, etc.,) they would never experience during their "the teen sidekicks of..." days just a few years earlier.
I don't mean this disrespectfully but I am wondering how old you are. Because, as I mentioned before, I remember the sixties and I don't recall things nearly as anti-Robin as you claim. I am curious where your information comes from.
 
Today is the 95th birthday of Phyllis Coates, still our friend @Ryan Thomas Riddle's favorite screen Lois Lane.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Coates was Lois in the very first Superman feature film, Superman and the Mole-Men, and went on to play the role for the first season of the Adventures of Superman TV series, opposite George Reeves's Man of Steel. She's the last surviving cast member of that show. Her Lois was steely, snappy, and determined. As seen several times in the clips above, Coates had a scream Fay Wray would envy, but she was no damsel: Just watch her smack a fool at 1:04.

Coates was not as large with the legacy casting as her AoS co-star Jack Larson or her successor as Lois, Noel Neill, but she did do a nice turn as mother to Teri Hatcher's Lois in the first-season finale of Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman.

A very happy birthday to a great lady!
 
Again, the September 2011 issue was a much-hyped reboot starting with a new #1, which of course sold way better than a #779 that's mid-story would. Which is why I gave the August 2011 sales figures for context. For further context, the hype of the reboot did not last, as by #23 in August 2013 (so about two years later), sales were down to 34,747 units again, with no other WW title that month.

For a better comparison to the #1 of 2011, January 2020 saw the anniversary issue #750, which took the number one spot in the sales charts that month and sold 167,377 units, about double the New52 launch, despite a $9.99 cover price.

So I would not worry about the sales of Wonder Woman comics too much. They're just fine.

Sales are irrelevant.

Unless there's been some change to the deal in the last ten years.

There has to be a monthly Wonder Woman comic for DC to retain the rights to Wonder Woman.

That's 80 million a year worth of frisbees and key chains.
 
I don't mean this disrespectfully but I am wondering how old you are. Because, as I mentioned before, I remember the sixties and I don't recall things nearly as anti-Robin as you claim. I am curious where your information comes from.

Based on your response, I would question you in the same way, because i'm, old enough to remember Robbins and Novick beginning their landmark work on Batman, and old enough to not only know other readers from the 60s who had their negative opinions about Robin (and the TV version's influence),but read the letters pages from the era in question where fans openly complained about Robin as described here. Its simply matter of history that so many fans not only wanted Batman to return to his dark roots, but wanted Robin anywhere other than Batman's side, hence one of the many reasons the split occurred in the comics, with Robin getting his solo feature in Detective and making sporadic appearances in the main title.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top