Yes.IIRC, wasn't the oven door open too?
Yes.IIRC, wasn't the oven door open too?
I'm starting to wonder if
we're heading for some kind of loose adaptation of "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?" as the series finale. Worth noting that "Jordan" was Superman's alias in that story after he faked his death. It would make sense -- we're seeing Superman on the verge of being outed as Clark Kent, he's losing his powers, his arch-nemesis is coming after him, and he's got superpowered progeny. The threads seem to be aligning in much the same direction as that story.
Interesting thought!
I had to keep myself from yelling, "Kick his ass, Clark!" all through that fight.
He's got enough money to give everyone in town 10 million dollars and not blink an eye.Yeah, I appreciate that Clark's a good person or whatever, but this version of Lex is so blatantly unhinged and barely-competent, it's hard imagine why people, including rough, violent people, are willing to put up with him.
I'm not entirely sure. Not-Mercy certainly blinked, and she's (relatively) sane.He's got enough money to give everyone in town 10 million dollars and not blink an eye.
He's got enough money to give everyone in town 10 million dollars and not blink an eye.
She's blinded by love which seems to counter act her sanity.I'm not entirely sure. Not-Mercy certainly blinked, and she's (relatively) sane.
She's blinded by love which seems to counter act her sanity.
Exactly.He's got enough money to give everyone in town 10 million dollars and not blink an eye.
Again--exactly. Some cannot understand that accusations of "bully" and any other description are not deal-breakers with some in relationships, meaning in Amanda's case, she's been with Luthor for so long, that she's not bothered by his projections toward others. In fact, she's an enabler of it, not a victim up to this point, hence her decision to stay with him and lead him into wearing the suit..She's blinded by love which seems to counter act her sanity.
I didn't much of him but what I did see of Titus Welliver's version in Titans seemed good too.
You may or may not think so though. Not everyone agrees on this matter.I haven't seen any of the episodes with him, but it's disappointing to hear that the Superman series has one of the worst versions of Luthor in a while.
I don't think Cudlitz's version is bad at all, but it's a radically different take on the character. Though we're still evidently supposed to understand that he's a genius of some sort, his presentation is mostly blunt force and intimidation, especially after almost two decades in prison. But many of the screen Luthors have been pretty free adaptations from the comics version, which I've never had a problem with. And Cudlitz is extremely effective for the kind of Luthor they've chosen to present.I haven't seen any of the episodes with him, but it's disappointing to hear that the Superman series has one of the worst versions of Luthor in a while. Especially after Jon Cryer was so phenomenal in the other Arrowverse shows. I didn't much of him but what I did see of Titus Welliver's version in Titans seemed good too.
Pretty much. Maybe a little more over the top/campier? (Which, to be clear, was tremendously fun, and which Cryer performed brilliantly.) His initial two appearances on Supergirl were probably the peak writing for the character, but he remained a highlight of every episode in which he appeared.A question for those in the know.
Was Cryer's Luthor in the Crisis crossover emblematic of his turn in general?
Tragically, no.(And did they ever make a reference to his nephew Lenny?)
That's actually kind of a bummer. It feels like the kind of thing they usually go for.Tragically, no.
But many of the screen Luthors have been pretty free adaptations from the comics version, which I've never had a problem with.
And Cudlitz is extremely effective for the kind of Luthor they've chosen to present.
Cudlitz's Luthor is based on more realistic influences, as opposed to the historically more-often-than-not self-defeating clown as presented in decades' worth of comics. Superman and Lois had to create its own version to fit the tone of the main players: few to none were going to be intimidated by a sniveling Cryer version, the buffoonish Hackman version, or any other interpretation.I don't think Cudlitz's version is bad at all, but it's a radically different take on the character. Though we're still evidently supposed to understand that he's a genius of some sort, his presentation is mostly blunt force and intimidation, especially after almost two decades in prison. But many of the screen Luthors have been pretty free adaptations from the comics version, which I've never had a problem with. And Cudlitz is extremely effective for the kind of Luthor they've chosen to present.
I'll admit, I'm a big fan of Titus Welliver, so that might have colored my perception of his version a bit.I don't think Cudlitz's version is bad at all, but it's a radically different take on the character. Though we're still evidently supposed to understand that he's a genius of some sort, his presentation is mostly blunt force and intimidation, especially after almost two decades in prison. But many of the screen Luthors have been pretty free adaptations from the comics version, which I've never had a problem with. And Cudlitz is extremely effective for the kind of Luthor they've chosen to present.
But it's true his version can't hold a candle to Cryer's brilliant turn in the role -- though that's partly down to the writing choices made for each series' take on the character, as well.
As for Welliver, I fear he left little impression on me. Not really the actor's fault, but as Christopher said, he only appears in one episode, and basically has like three scenes. Not really much chance to leave a major impression as the character (though our absent friend Ovation was a big fan, so he worked for somebody).
I dunno, I really like this version of Luthor. Is he my favorite? No. I never watched Smallville, but I heard Rosenbaum's has been the closest to the comic book version of Luthor. That, and Clancy Brown's animated version.Yeah, I appreciate that Clark's a good person or whatever, but this version of Lex is so blatantly unhinged and barely-competent, it's hard imagine why people, including rough, violent people, are willing to put up with him. As I said earlier, it's like everyone's just standing around chatting reasonably with a xenomorph or a grizzly bear or a rabid wolf. Clark should be much more open to playing hardball. Even TAS Superman was willing to be intimidating to Lex five minutes after meeting him, creepily floating outside his office. This Lex is a buffoonish bully, and it baffles me that no one seems to realize they can take control of the situation just by not obeying in advance (which, to be fair, finally happened in the bar in this episode). If they don't give him the submission or other reaction he craves, what's he going to do? Something ostentatiously violent and blatantly illegal, which is something of a self-correcting problem given his lack of a support structure.