• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Super Bowl ad screenshots

It's not "for" me. It's for the forum. Or can you not do what you claimed you can so easily do?



Fine. How much do you want?

$925

That'll only cover HALF the time and cost of my turning down an article assignment to dig this stuff out, or if need be, to recreate it. And it doesn't even include buying model parts; I'll eat that part of the cost.

Think what a win-win it can be for you. if I flake, you can claim to have been swindled. If I disappear with the money off the board forever, you'll make tons of people happy and it'll be spun to invalidate anything I or anybody you tar with the 'old fan' mentality ever said or did. And of course, no matter how well it is executed, you can say it looks like shit.

:rolleyes:

Guys, that's about enough of this 'pay me to back my assertion' topic.

This is a recreational message board. Not a house of commerce. Although I wish that it were a house of commerce, because if that were the case, at my billing rates as a CPA, I'd be a multimillionaire a few times over by now, given how much time I've spent here over the past 7.5 years.

Around here - you post something, you must be prepared to back your assertion. PERIOD. Not be PAID to back your assertion. Just back your assertion.

Or don't make said assertion in the first place.

Nothing new about this concept. It's sorta fundamental to participation on a message board. Or, at least on THIS message board.

Is it actually in the posting rules? That the owners of the BBS are the only ones who can profit from it? What does that say about authors who post here? Shouldn't they be banned, since the bbs might contribute to their book sales?

Go back and read the posts leading up to all this. I put forth a dissenting opinion, backed it up six ways from Sunday, and still had the slavering horde jumping ... and that was before all this 'triple-dog-dare-you' juvenilia. For that much effort to contribute balance, I shoulda ALREADY gotten paid by somebody.
 
Yay, our excitement and optimism is now balanced with the proper amount of bitching and moaning. I was really missing that, I haven't seen it in a whole ten minutes.
 
well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.

I would say Saldana is the better looking of the two, but she is younger & closer to my age.
 
well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??
 
well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??

Well, people may have mercifully blocked the fan dance from their memories. Uhura's sexuality was certainly on display in episodes like "Mirror, Mirror" though.
 
well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??

Well, people may have mercifully blocked the fan dance from their memories. Uhura's sexuality was certainly on display in episodes like "Mirror, Mirror" though.

And in "I, Mudd," and "The Man Trap," and in "The Squire of Gothos.."

Just to name a couple...
 
Wow, what's with all the fan-dance hate?

I'll be thrilled if my wife looks that good at 57.

As for the important question... Zoe(2000's) has a prettier face but Nichelle(1960's) had a hotter bod.
 
The fan dance was alluring and fun to see. It's a shame it was in a subpar/bad TREK movie is all.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top