Nope.Saldana's actually quite a bit better looking than Nichols.
Yup.
Nope.Saldana's actually quite a bit better looking than Nichols.
Nope.Saldana's actually quite a bit better looking than Nichols.
Yup.
Saldana's actually quite a bit better looking than Nichols.
It's not "for" me. It's for the forum. Or can you not do what you claimed you can so easily do?
Fine. How much do you want?
$925
That'll only cover HALF the time and cost of my turning down an article assignment to dig this stuff out, or if need be, to recreate it. And it doesn't even include buying model parts; I'll eat that part of the cost.
Think what a win-win it can be for you. if I flake, you can claim to have been swindled. If I disappear with the money off the board forever, you'll make tons of people happy and it'll be spun to invalidate anything I or anybody you tar with the 'old fan' mentality ever said or did. And of course, no matter how well it is executed, you can say it looks like shit.
Guys, that's about enough of this 'pay me to back my assertion' topic.
This is a recreational message board. Not a house of commerce. Although I wish that it were a house of commerce, because if that were the case, at my billing rates as a CPA, I'd be a multimillionaire a few times over by now, given how much time I've spent here over the past 7.5 years.
Around here - you post something, you must be prepared to back your assertion. PERIOD. Not be PAID to back your assertion. Just back your assertion.
Or don't make said assertion in the first place.
Nothing new about this concept. It's sorta fundamental to participation on a message board. Or, at least on THIS message board.
Nope.Saldana's actually quite a bit better looking than Nichols.
Yup.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Well, people may have mercifully blocked the fan dance from their memories. Uhura's sexuality was certainly on display in episodes like "Mirror, Mirror" though.
yeah I dont really want to recall that.Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Too bad, because it completely invalidates your point.yeah I dont really want to recall that.Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??well its clear they are using Saldana's sexuality in this movie, which was not the case with Nichols.
Wow, what's with all the fan-dance hate?
I'll be thrilled if my wife looks that good at 57.
As for the important question... Zoe(2000's) has a prettier face but Nichelle(1960's) had a hotter bod.
hopefully one day ill be able to complete erase that image from my mind.Too bad, because it completely invalidates your point.yeah I dont really want to recall that.Are you high?? Nichols' sexuality was used plenty, not only in the series, but in the films as well.. Fan dance, anyone??
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.