It's all canon. Except for Very Short Treks and possibly Scouts. I've never seen Scouts, and probably never will, so I wouldn't know about that. On the other hand, I unfortunately watched some of VST.Who cares, if you want to consider it canon, consider it canon, if you don't, don't.
No one is forcing you to watch SNW, or the potential Year One.
I personally just separate it by eras.
PilotVerse is
The Cage
TOS
TAS
and TMP
MeyerVerse is
TWOK
SFS
TVA
FF
UC
BermanVerse is
TNG, Generations, DS9, First Contact, Voyager, Insurrection, and ENT
KelvinVerse
'09, ID, Beyond
DiscoVerse
Discovery,SNW, (Year One?), Lower Decks, Section 31, Star Trek Picard, Starfleet Academy and Short Treks all comprise this.
There are always shared elements, but these are all their own canons in my head, there is a broad canon, but there is a stylistic difference between eras, to such a degree, that I consider them smaller canons.
Scouts is totally canon, those kids are gonna be borg by the series finale.It's all canon. Except for Very Short Treks and possibly Scouts. I've never seen Scouts, so I wouldn't know about that. On the other hand, I unfortunately watched some of VST.
But, if you're asking me about timelines, then I break it down as:
Legacy Trek: ENT, TOS/TAS, TOS Movies, TNG, DS9, VOY, TNG Movies, LD, PRO, PIC
Disco Trek: DSC S1-S2, SNW, S31, DSC S3-S5, SFA
Kelvin Trek: The three Abrams Movies
Legacy Trek also happened in Disco Trek, except TOS/TAS looks more like SNW. Everything else is >99% the same.
according to wikipedia lol it says kurtzman expanded star trekIt's not.
according to wikipedia lol it says kurtzman expanded star trek
and your point is?according to wikipedia lol it says kurtzman expanded star trek
It already exists, it's called Star Trek, it released in 1966.there has to be a sequel to strange new worlds
and your point is?
It already exists, it's called Star Trek, it released in 1966.
noI'd like to be ethical, and just divorce it from TOS, as an alternate timeline.
Huh?The Design and tech on the USS Kelvin in '09, suggest a borg influence,
TOS size was never firmly established on screen.That's why the SNW Connie is larger than TOS, but smaller than Kelvin's Connie.
So to summarize, the studio who owns Trek can still do whatever they want with the IP, which could include invalidating past works that don't line up with the story they want to tell now. But that is unlikely to happen, unless Skydance takes the attitude of cleaning house.
Why would they want to?
The fact of the matter is that they exist.
If Year One happens, I feel like Canon is going to hold Year One back.I can't for the life of me figure out how the word "ethical" applies in that context.
If Year One happens, I feel like Canon is going to hold Year One back.
I feel like Canon has been holding the franchise back for a while.
We have to keep going and messing with the past, instead of just going forward.
It's kind of a disservice to that show to tie it to TOS.
It's not going to hurt TOS any.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.