• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds Episode 7 - Those Old Scientists

Grade The Episode


  • Total voters
    319
This episode is popular to a lot of people apparently. For those who don't understand my confusion and the viewpoint of those who don't like Lower Decks, try to imagine if you wake up one day and look on your local Star Wars website and find out that Jar-Jar Binks is suddenly one of SW's most popular characters, there's a whole tv show about him, the crossover episode of Andor where Jar-Jar appeared is considered one of Andor's best episodes, and if you say anything remotely critical about the episode (not to the point where you're hazing Ahmed Best towards suicide of course, that was horrific that people actually did that) but just minor stuff saying this show and this character aren't really that great, you're told off as saying you don't like Star Wars and that you're not really a Star Wars fan.
 
]
I Appreciated the shorter run time. It made the episode pace better, and I think some of the episodes this season (Like Lotus Eaters and Lost in Translation) could have benefited by being a little shorter.

I wouldn't cut a moment from any of them. But yes, my intent was to point out that faster pacing is better for funny stories.
 
Why not? Presumably for the 1701 and the C wreckage could have been recovered and installed. Even if that was after construction if we assume the A was already finished.

Stranger things happen for tradition.

Nobody knew the NCC-1701 was going to get blown up over Genesis. How would anyone have gotten anything from it?

Additionally, how would anyone have gotten ahold of any C wreckage?
 
It's such a trip that Animated Pike's hair is so much less exagerated than Live-Action Pike's. :lol:

If it's desperately important to anyone, it's entirely plausible that the damaged NCC-1701 that had been docked at Earth for decommissioning at the beginning of ST III had parts removed from it for a variety of reasons. One would be damage analysis - useful in new hull, shield and weapon design. Another would be that self-same tradition of intending to install some of it in a new build.

One could go further, and assume that of the many tons of material removed from the TOS ship in order to refit it - say, the entirety of two big honkin' nacelles, for instance - some had been warehoused by Starfleet. The refit is not a new ship, it's a, uh, refit of the TOS Enterprise. So archived bits of the TOS ship would serve for the exact same traditional purpose as stuff from the refit.
 
Last edited:
I liked how Pike looked on this alt cover for the Illyrian Enigma comic
CUstTx4.png
 
I do like that they gave us that little fact that each subsequent ship has a piece of the previous one used in its construction. Makes me wonder which piece of the -A was used in the construction of the -B.

I think it was the Diane Carey novel 'Ship of the Line' that first established that each Enterprise has had a piece of the previous Enterprise as part of its construction.
 
The episode would've been funnier in my opinion if Pike said, "Sorry Ensign Boimler, I have to keep the ship safe even if it means offending your sensibilities" and attacked the Orions as pirates, chased them across the galaxy after they took the portal, stunned an entire crowd of Orions on the way to the Orion crew only for Pike to find the nerdiest looking Orions you've ever seen and the Orion captain to be like, "Dude, we're scientists, we're just getting a scan and were going to put the portal back and we'd have done it sooner if you had just asked". Have the Orion scientist look a bit like Doc Brown/Einstein even.
 
This episode is popular to a lot of people apparently. For those who don't understand my confusion and the viewpoint of those who don't like Lower Decks, try to imagine if you wake up one day and look on your local Star Wars website and find out that Jar-Jar Binks is suddenly one of SW's most popular characters, there's a whole tv show about him, the crossover episode of Andor where Jar-Jar appeared is considered one of Andor's best episodes, and if you say anything remotely critical about the episode (not to the point where you're hazing Ahmed Best towards suicide of course, that was horrific that people actually did that) but just minor stuff saying this show and this character aren't really that great, you're told off as saying you don't like Star Wars and that you're not really a Star Wars fan.


Once again, no one is saying if you don’t like the episode or Lower Decks that you’re not a Trek fan

The alternate reality where you folks imagine yourselves as a persecuted minority doesn’t exist anywhere but in your own head and those who share your collective delusions
 
I love how the Orion science ship was almost a copy of the Orion raider vessel in the Remastered version of "Journey to Babel(TOS)." But...I thought SNW hated TOS Era visual continuity?
 
This episode is popular to a lot of people apparently. For those who don't understand my confusion and the viewpoint of those who don't like Lower Decks, try to imagine if you wake up one day and look on your local Star Wars website and find out that Jar-Jar Binks is suddenly one of SW's most popular characters, there's a whole tv show about him, the crossover episode of Andor where Jar-Jar appeared is considered one of Andor's best episodes, and if you say anything remotely critical about the episode (not to the point where you're hazing Ahmed Best towards suicide of course, that was horrific that people actually did that) but just minor stuff saying this show and this character aren't really that great, you're told off as saying you don't like Star Wars and that you're not really a Star Wars fan.

I take issue with the Jar Jar Binks comparison. LD is not Jar Jar Binks level. LD is a funny and charming meta look at Trek. But maybe you should ask yourself why this crossover is the most popular SNW episode (currently standing at 91.4%)? Perhaps you should not dismiss our opinions so quickly? And nobody is saying that you are not a true fan. But you should not assume either that "your Trek" is the only correct Trek and anything different is somehow not "real Trek". You may not like LD or this crossover but it is still Trek. Heck, I don't like Discovery but it is still Star Trek. And Discovery fans are still Trek fans.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top