"Screw General Order One" was about my favorite moment in the pilot.
"They're doubling down on renaming it The Prime Directive."
"Well, that'll never stick."
"Screw General Order One" was about my favorite moment in the pilot.
They saved a species from a natural disaster, who 50 years later became pure assholes and did something so horrible, that the Federation thinks that saving them was a bad idea and the cost to the universe to keep these assholes around is too much.
I agree, but that one little prison cell scene in episode 1 raised a million red flags for me. Pike and Una talk professionally, then La'an comes in and says something like "I hate to interrupt but..." A throwaway joke on the surface, but it felt like a wink-wink from the writers.
Wrong franchise. (Although I'd argue that's not what the author of the other franchise meant, either.)
Trek is largely about the opposite of that motto.
Sure... but then that raises the question of when exactly is it OK to intervene. Warp development? They could still be centuries behind you in many ways. I think a more reasonable, case-by-case evaluation is warranted.I think it is more than just becoming a**holes. Maybe someone on that planet eventually becomes the next galactic Hitler? Maybe that planet eventually becomes the homeworld of the next Dominion or the next Borg? So I think it is possible that the Federation decided that since they can't know in advance how their actions will affect the galaxy in the future, that it is better to just let nature takes it course.
They appeared in two episodes of EnterpriseNausicaans are already known...
I hope you're right and my radar is just badly calibrated.Well, I have no idea what the reference is. It just sounded like natural conversation to me.
Living documents are susceptible to the flavour of the day, or century, as it were. It could be as simple as prevailing opinion of those in charge/the majority at different points in time.The prime directive is a living document.
The endless articles are possibly amendments?
Regardless General Order One is constantly being Challenged in Court Martials, and the results of those trials can go either way depending on circumstances, and the document is rewritten.
In the 23rd century, they are allowed to discretely stop natural disasters on prewarp worlds.
In the Kelvin 23rd century they were still allowed to discretely stop natural disasters on prewarp worlds.
In the 24th century they are not allowed to stop natural disasters on prewarp worlds.
Why the change in policy?
2 possible reasons are opportunity and responsibility.
1. If there's a class M world that loses all it's people, that's a world the Federation can take and colonize or mine for resources.
2. They saved a species from a natural disaster, who 50 years later became pure assholes and did something so horrible, that the Federation thinks that saving them was a bad idea and the cost to the universe to keep these assholes around is too much.
Sure... but then that raises the question of when exactly is it OK to intervene. Warp development? They could still be centuries behind you in many ways. I think a more reasonable, case-by-case evaluation is warranted.
Sure... but then that raises the question of when exactly is it OK to intervene. Warp development? They could still be centuries behind you in many ways. I think a more reasonable, case-by-case evaluation is warranted.
They need a show where the Federation is dying and they find an alien species who could save them but won't, not because they would let nature take its course but because the federation is a bunch of sanctimonious pricks.
Living documents are susceptible to the flavour of the day, or century, as it were. It could be as simple as prevailing opinion of those in charge/the majority at different points in time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.