Sounds like an impact to me.
You’re welcome to think whatever you like.
Sounds like an impact to me.
to 99.9% of the viewers the ship looks more or less the same. it's a minor detail, a far minor detail compared to the changing looks of Klingons between the TOS and the TNG era.Right. So you have a collection of minor hiccups and think it is somehow comparable to retconning an entire era and the most iconic ship in the franchise.
No, it's not a perfect fit but just doing a cursory read of transcripts and the like I can make it work for my head canon. ENT is actually a bigger problem for me than TOS and DSC. Stupid SulibanIn Balance of Terror they speak specifically about 'invisibility being theoretically possible' though, which is super odd thing to say if it has been known and seen to be perfectly practically possible for over a century and prominently used in a recent war.
I wouldn't have either. The Cleave Ship and the Sarcophagus were large enough to provideI'd have never used cloaks in DSC. At all. But it is what it is and now we're stuck with it. We either ignore it or head canon our way around it.
Same here. This is supposed to be humanity's future, not just its own separate world. Understanding of technology is going to grow along with production values.It's a fine line. I'm more than happy tossing out stuff that doesn't work like UESPA (original edition),laser pistols, Vulcanis, Data's graduation date and the 1701 being an Earth ship with out creating an new continuity because that stuff has little or no impact on the larger universe. I'm also cool with changing or updating visuals and "surprise" relatives for the same reason.
Yes, I do think that. I also think that the franchise has done this before and will do so again.Right. So you have a collection of minor hiccups and think it is somehow comparable to retconning an entire era and the most iconic ship in the franchise.
Forcefields have been a part of Trek since the beginning. Robots and the swarm of fighters are more challenging however I think it was a temporary upgrade for a war and the fact that the Enterprise was sent away from the front-lines as a last best hope if the war turned against the Federation. Those assets were temporary and not part of the deep space exploration mission Kirk eventually ran.but forcefields, robots, Enterprise being able to launch an insane swarm of fighters. It really doesn't seem like the same setting.
This is true for me too. It is very difficult for me to believe something is in the future when technology of "the future" is outpaced by today's tech.Star Trek's tech should always be "upgraded". It should never look like yesterday's future. And that how I do Trek.
It doesn't matter how often you repeat that. FC must have changed something.As I said earlier, FC had nothing to do with it.
Source?
It doesn't matter how often you repeat that. FC must have changed something.
FC, ENT, and my brain's logical 4D thinking. Do you have one for your opinion?Really? You have a source for that other than your opinion?
FC, ENT, and my brain's logical 4D thinking. Do you have one for your opinion?
Then I guess for you all ships consist only of the rooms we were explicitly shown, and only events that we explicitly saw did happen, unless production staff mentioned them. Anything not on screen or brought up by staff does not exist for you? Your own chosen limitation, I supposeNot an opinion. It’s a fact that no one in-universe or production staff in real life has acknowledged that the timeline changed after FC.
Then I guess for you all ships consist only of the rooms we were explicitly shown, and only events that we explicitly saw did happen, unless production staff mentioned them. Anything not on screen or brought up by staff does not exist for you?
But hardly logical or reasonable.
If it did, the changes must have fizzled out by the 24th century, because Picard abd Co. didn’t notice any differences.FC must have changed something.
The Golden Ratio is mostly bunk. (link)1) Engineers have been using the golden ratio since the Parthenon. It's also in just about every introductory textbook on art written since the Renaissance. The suggestion that Jeffries wouldn't be aware of it is insane.
2) Equally groundless is the assertion it isn't present in the design of the Enterprise. The linked article demonstrates ample evidence of that. Both major elements and minor details conform to it.
So the toilet in the Enterprise-A brig is the only one in the Federation...?Then I guess for you all ships consist only of the rooms we were explicitly shown, and only events that we explicitly saw did happen, unless production staff mentioned them.
Apparently XDSo the toilet in the Enterprise-A brig is the only one in the Federation...?![]()
The struggle is real. Once I started trying to design the INSIDE of ships, and not just slick cool outsides, you get confronted with "where do you put the plumbing". I have a new appreciation for those who get a Masters Degree in Architecture.So the toilet in the Enterprise-A brig is the only one in the Federation...?![]()
Plumbing? I could've swore 24th century+ toilets have matter dematerializers that break down all waste products into their basic elements for re-use in the matter tanks.The struggle is real. Once I started trying to design the INSIDE of ships, and not just slick cool outsides, you get confronted with "where do you put the plumbing". I have a new appreciation for those who get a Masters Degree in Architecture.
yep, where do you think replicators get the organic material from?Plumbing? I could've swore 24th century+ toilets have matter dematerializers that break down all waste products into their basic elements for re-use in the matter tanks.
=D
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.