• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

I'm putting a TL:DR at the beginning to share my way of working within a fictional franchise. I can rationalize away nearly anything in most works of fiction. That's just how my brain operates. So, the following is my own interpretation, based upon visual evidence, and writer intent (that DSC is in the same continuity as TOS).

No, its not perfect, nor will I claim it to be. It is close enough for me. Mileage will vary, and I respect that. IDIC.
In Balance of Terror they speak specifically about 'invisibility being theoretically possible' though, which is super odd thing to say if it has been known and seen to be perfectly practically possible for over a century and prominently used in a recent war.
No, it's not a perfect fit but just doing a cursory read of transcripts and the like I can make it work for my head canon. ENT is actually a bigger problem for me than TOS and DSC. Stupid Suliban :shifty:
I'd have never used cloaks in DSC. At all. But it is what it is and now we're stuck with it. We either ignore it or head canon our way around it.
I wouldn't have either. The Cleave Ship and the Sarcophagus were large enough to provide
It's a fine line. I'm more than happy tossing out stuff that doesn't work like UESPA (original edition),laser pistols, Vulcanis, Data's graduation date and the 1701 being an Earth ship with out creating an new continuity because that stuff has little or no impact on the larger universe. I'm also cool with changing or updating visuals and "surprise" relatives for the same reason.
Same here. This is supposed to be humanity's future, not just its own separate world. Understanding of technology is going to grow along with production values.
Right. So you have a collection of minor hiccups and think it is somehow comparable to retconning an entire era and the most iconic ship in the franchise.
Yes, I do think that. I also think that the franchise has done this before and will do so again.

but forcefields, robots, Enterprise being able to launch an insane swarm of fighters. It really doesn't seem like the same setting.
Forcefields have been a part of Trek since the beginning. Robots and the swarm of fighters are more challenging however I think it was a temporary upgrade for a war and the fact that the Enterprise was sent away from the front-lines as a last best hope if the war turned against the Federation. Those assets were temporary and not part of the deep space exploration mission Kirk eventually ran.

Again, this is a mileage will vary. No doubt many will consider that too much thought and just be happy with it being another continuity. That's great. It's also not for me. I have several workarounds from TOS to the rest of the series. :shrug:
Star Trek's tech should always be "upgraded". It should never look like yesterday's future. And that how I do Trek.
This is true for me too. It is very difficult for me to believe something is in the future when technology of "the future" is outpaced by today's tech.

y0ByHSR.jpg
 
One day they'll make a Trek that pulls a Halloween or Terminator, and picks up after one of the earlier movies deliberately ignoring everything that comes after. Heads will explode.

And does anyone remember "Balance of Terror", when phasers were photon torpedoes and Kirk had to use shipboard communications to order them fired from the bridge, to someone below decks who had to press a special button? Which never happened again?

Or when Pike's crew used hand lasers? And a massive laser cannon because phasers weren't thought of until the series proper?
 
Not an opinion. It’s a fact that no one in-universe or production staff in real life has acknowledged that the timeline changed after FC.
Then I guess for you all ships consist only of the rooms we were explicitly shown, and only events that we explicitly saw did happen, unless production staff mentioned them. Anything not on screen or brought up by staff does not exist for you? Your own chosen limitation, I suppose ;)
But hardly logical or reasonable.
 
Then I guess for you all ships consist only of the rooms we were explicitly shown, and only events that we explicitly saw did happen, unless production staff mentioned them. Anything not on screen or brought up by staff does not exist for you?

Nope, because this is just a fictional show and I have no control over what the producers do with it. And CBS has made it clear that we can no longer trust our own eyes when watching these shows, so any visual changes we see are not the result of a changed timeline, but rather that our eyes are just faulty.

But hardly logical or reasonable.

Logic and reason have nothing to do with it (see above.)
 
1) Engineers have been using the golden ratio since the Parthenon. It's also in just about every introductory textbook on art written since the Renaissance. The suggestion that Jeffries wouldn't be aware of it is insane.

2) Equally groundless is the assertion it isn't present in the design of the Enterprise. The linked article demonstrates ample evidence of that. Both major elements and minor details conform to it.
The Golden Ratio is mostly bunk. (link)
 
So the toilet in the Enterprise-A brig is the only one in the Federation...? :crazy:
The struggle is real. Once I started trying to design the INSIDE of ships, and not just slick cool outsides, you get confronted with "where do you put the plumbing". I have a new appreciation for those who get a Masters Degree in Architecture.
 
The struggle is real. Once I started trying to design the INSIDE of ships, and not just slick cool outsides, you get confronted with "where do you put the plumbing". I have a new appreciation for those who get a Masters Degree in Architecture.
Plumbing? I could've swore 24th century+ toilets have matter dematerializers that break down all waste products into their basic elements for re-use in the matter tanks.

=D
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top