Spoilers Starfleet Academy General Discussion Thread

[fireproof78]

Will he, though?

Tune in next week to find out! Same Bat time. Same Bat Channel!

 

[Campe]

Will he, though?

Likely not.

 

[Fateor]

If Brad Boimler had behaved the way Mir did when he first arrived at the Academy, he would have likely been similarly slapped down and would have deserved it.

If Brad Boimler had done that in the 24th century he probably would have had a student come up and offer to help him with his bag all the while piling the guilt on him for acting like a drama queen.

Brad was often slapped down anyway.

By Mariner, which was punching sideways since they were the same rank.

She is still referred to as an instructor some 30 years later where she's the longest serving Academy staff member ever but there's wiggle room there with what instructor means, there's no rule that says the chancellor can't also teach a class.

The writers also don't have to follow anything in the flash forward if they don't want to.

 

[fireproof78]

If Brad Boimler had done that in the 24th century he probably would have had a student come up and offer to help him with his bag all the while piling the guilt on him for acting like a drama queen.

Making fun of poor performers is Starfleet tradition.

 

[Firebird]

The writers also don't have to follow anything in the flash forward if they don't want to.

This is literally the kind of thing you've repeatedly complained about the writers of the current era of Trek shows doing. You don't get to have it both ways because you don't like Discovery.

 

[Danja]

The one time they didn't complain about the zippers was in ENT, but at that point they couldn't stop complaining about the Romulans having cloaks in the 22nd century.

Spock wore a poncho in TMP.

 

[Turtletrekker]

Spock wore a poncho in TMP.

And he looked good in it.

 

[Danja]

And he looked good in it.

Indeed.

 

[Fateor]

This is literally the kind of thing you've repeatedly complained about the writers of the current era of Trek shows doing. You don't get to have it both ways because you don't like Discovery.

No temporal defenses means time isn't fixed for them.

 

[Firebird]

No temporal defenses means time isn't fixed for them.

What a convenient excuse.

 

[Danja]

The writers also don't have to follow anything in the flash forward if they don't want to.

This is literally the kind of thing you've repeatedly complained about the writers of the current era of Trek shows doing. You don't get to have it both ways because you don't like Discovery.

No temporal defenses means time isn't fixed for them.

What a convenient excuse.

 

[fireproof78]

What a convenient excuse.

Most technobabble is.

Why can't we use that magic thing again?

'Cause...reasons.

 

[Set Harth]

holy schnikes!!

 

[NCC-73515]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I am in this video