• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 3x08 - "Four-And-A-Half Vulcans"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    178
IIRC, one of the lead animators on TAS really was color blind.
It's true that Hal Sutherland was colour blind, but according to Animator Bob Kline, the use of pinks (and greens) was not because of him, but Irv Kaplan.

According to Bob Kline, "Pink equals Irv Kaplan. Irv was in charge of ink and paint, coloring the various characters and props (and he would do it himself in his office, he would sit down with a cel and paint it). He was also referred to by many people there as the purple and green guy. You'll see in a lot of scenes, purple and green used together – that was one of his preferences. He made dragons red, the Kzintis' costumes pink. It was all Irv Kaplan's call. He wasn't listening to anyone else when he picked colors, or anything." (Star Trek: The Official Guide to the Animated Series, p. 26)
 
Last edited:
It's true that Hal Sutherland was colour blind, but according to Animator Bob Kline, the use of pinks (and greens) was not because of him, but Irv Kaplan.



Yes. Kill that myth with fire.

(Also: Alexander Courage did NOT leave Star Trek over Roddenberry's lyrical shenanigans. He wrote for ALL THREE SEASONS and orchestrated several movies. Including the one Roddenberry was on.)
 
I guess pink Klingons sort of fits given that some Klingon blood starting in 1991 and extending to at least one episode of DSC is pink. :)
 
Neither, because Vulcans aren’t real and Trek has always lean heavily into the Alien race is X trope. Starting with…you guessed it, the Vulcans.
Except Trek also uses races as a parable to make a point, and the only point I see here is that Vulcans are kind of awful. It fell into the STV trap of laughing at the characters instead of with them. You could also say many lines in TOS/TOS movies were racist.
 
Except Trek also uses races as a parable to make a point, and the only point I see here is that Vulcans are kind of awful. It fell into the STV trap of laughing at the characters instead of with them. You could also say many lines in TOS/TOS movies were racist.
Not always, Sometimes Vulcans are jerks, just to be jerks. Of course the "racists" in this episode were the Vulcans who looked down on Spock for being half human and the humans for being human. And maybe that's what makes people uncomfortable. They see the Vulcans as a "Hero" species, but that's never been true. The Vulcans we meet in TOS (aside from Spock) are not heroes. They are cold, manipulative and scheming. Surak doesn't count as he is Spock's idealization of Surak. Even Spock himself when he goes into "full Vulcan mode" is less than "heroic." He usually has to do something "human" to save the day, like play a hunch or trust his gut. And that's at play here. Being Vulcan sounds great on paper, but the reality has innumerable drawbacks. Vulcan main characters are good for giving harsh cold facts and advice, like "kill Gary Mitchell" to offer a counterpoint to us soft emotional humans. But that is used to highlight our humanity.
 
Yep. Weird Kirk didn't recognize Surak's name given a previous Enterprise Captain actually hosted Surak's katra at one point and humans and Vulcans had known one another for over two centuries, but hey, nobody's perfect. :lol:
 
All of the people the Excalbians impersonate (good and evil) are from Kirk and Spock's memories and perceptions.

That's what I mean. Spock or Kirk? It seems Kirk would know of Col Greene and Genghis Khan, but not Kahless or Zora - who appears to be a creation of the Excalbians despite Spock noting that she is a historical figure. There is no background on her at Memory Alpha other than the actress name and highlights from the plot.

Let's hope she doesn't appear next season!
 
That's what I mean. Spock or Kirk? It seems Kirk would know of Col Greene and Genghis Khan, but not Kahless or Zora - who appears to be a creation of the Excalbians despite Spock noting that she is a historical figure. There is no background on her at Memory Alpha other than the actress name and highlights from the plot.

Let's hope she doesn't appear next season!
What makes you think she's a creation of the Excalbians? She's a "rule of three" character. You have a real person, fictional human, and an alien when talking history. It's not always three. Less than a rule more of a guideline. ;)
You have to remember Green, Surak and Kahless were all original creations for "The Savage Curtain." None of them had a background at that point. Zora is no different. She's just one that hasn't been revisited. Since she's from "history" like the rest, so it's unlikely she's from the 23rd Century.
 
Yep. Weird Kirk didn't recognize Surak's name given a previous Enterprise Captain actually hosted Surak's katra at one point and humans and Vulcans had known one another for over two centuries, but hey, nobody's perfect. :lol:
You'd think Spock's parents would be listed on his file/service record somewhere for a Captain to consider when making a choice for First Officer, but either Kirk felt he knew Spock well enough from their interactions and meetings before he was granted Command of the 1701 - or Kirk only bothered to look at certain sections that he felt mattered. :shrug:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top