episode 9 was pretty mediocre. it was an alien and star trek 2009 rip off.
Pastiches are not rip-offs, and nothing about "All Those Who Wander" was a pastiche of ST09.
Hammer death was unearned.
What, to you, would be an "earned" death?
the dialogue was also pretty bad
The dialogue was fine. You just didn't like that SNW has characters who speak in modern-sounding vernacular instead of using the Berman-era conceit of everyone speaking in formal prescriptivist standard English.
I am sorry but i cannot see how an alien direct rip off is fresh. it is as un-fresh as star trek into darkness ripping of wrath of khan.
1)
Star Trek Into Darkness has a plot that's completely different from
The Wrath of Khan and its primary thematic conflict (militarism and authoritarianism vs. civil rights and liberties) is completely different from TWOK's primary thematic conflicts (the inevitability of mortality, finding meaning in life, vengeance vs. justice).
Into Darkness has
one scene that is an homage to TWOK, yet people treat it like it's a scene-for-scene remake. It's truly bizarre. Khan isn't even the main villain of
Into Darkness -- Admiral Marcus is!
2) Pastiches are, again, not rip-offs.
3) TOS's first season featured pastiches of
Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde ("The Enemy Within");
Hamlet ("The Conscience of the King");
The Enemy Below ("Balance of Terror");
Five Came Back ("The
Galileo Seven"); and every courtroom drama ever made ("Court-Martial"). And of course,
Star Trek itself is a pastiche of
Forbidden Planet. Doing pastiches is no sin.
yeah 3 months and 2 days and yet it has already ripped off many past shows and movies
It's done fewer pastiches than TOS Season One did.
SNW is lucky that James Cameron is too rich and too busy and likely does not watch streaming service as he would have sued SNW writers for all those who wander.
That not how any of this works.
First off, James Cameron was not the director of
Alien. That was Ridley Scott; the screenplay was by Dan O'Bannon from a story by O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett. Cameron wrote and directed
Aliens, the sequel to
Alien. "All Who Wander" is mostly a pastiche of the first film; the little girl is the only element inspired by the second film.
Secondly, directors don't own their movies when it's a big studio release. Neither Cameron, nor Scott, nor O'Bannon, nor Shusett, own the
Alien franchise. It is the property of 20th Century Studios, formerly 20th Century Fox, and is therefore the property of the Walt Disney Company. If anyone were to sue, it would be the Walt Disney Company, not James Cameron.
Thirdly, that's not how copyright works. Copyright allows for pastiches, particularly when there are key elements that are different. "All Who Wander" is about the importance of building and maintaining relationships in the face of loss;
Alien is about sexual violence and corporate oppression. The stories' hearts are in drastically different places, and their structures are different as a result.
Alien is not the first story to use the premise "heroes trapped in an isolated location with a monster out to get them."
Alex Kurtzman star trek show need to stop trying to redo other shows/movies in an obvious way. the finale of SNW had some issue similar to the finale of season 2 discovery.
... What the hell are you talking about? "The Quality of Mercy" and "Such Sweet Sorrow, Parts I & II" had completely different plots and themes.