they were supposed to ravage planets with them a couple of times.Not demonstrated on TOS. They're like the transporter - never quite enough until the plot calls for it.
they were supposed to ravage planets with them a couple of times.Not demonstrated on TOS. They're like the transporter - never quite enough until the plot calls for it.
which could have been shielded as well.It takes them a while to vaporize Apollo's Temple. I mean, yeah, the locus of power for an alien with deity-like abilities but still.
they were supposed to ravage planets with them a couple of times.
Surely the Terran empire did it many times. And the ship was supposed to be more or less equivalent.So it has been claimed. And they ravaged a planet...when?
The logic seems pretty clear.If you want to play "Superman can beat the Hulk because..." well, go ahead. The action in "The Apple" is just preposterous, and the logic of the show is among the weakest of the series up to that point.
Surely the Terran empire did it many times. And the ship was supposed to be more or less equivalent.
The logic seems pretty clear.
Point 1) Vaal was trying to destroy the enterprise, attempts at negotiating failed due to its total refuse to negotiate;
Point 2) Vaal had been keeping its subjects as slaves, barring them any form of development or free will, for thousands of years.
Ergo: Vaal needed to be stopped.
Actually if you go by the dialog of TOS S1 - A Taste Of Armageddon, Starfleet has a specific general order FOR it......Doesn't Starfleet have some rule against this kind of thing?..
Enough of this grimdark 60's Trek!!!!Yeah, and Scotty never once flinched and asked what General Order 24 was.
Starfleet gets dark when it wants.
We do this. we sacrifice certain members of our society so we can cure the diseases of the aging wealthy populations. the ancients sent their children through the fire to Molech so he would bring them wealth. He was the Rainmaker.Because as a society, they've decided that the math pans out. One child whose sacrifice is acknowledged, but whose actual suffering is kept out of sight, in exchange for an idyllic society with no deprivation or illness. It's not that they don't have the tech to evacuate or don't know how, it's that they've decided they're OK with the price of staying put.
I believe they like to call it having the bigger stick.I for one like a Starfleet willing to get that dark. It's not some Coast Guard running around trying to fix the galaxy's deep-seated problems handing out brochures. It's a fleet of heavily-armed ships with advanced defensive technology.
Throughout history a big navy with huge guns has always preceded being a dick to others.![]()
at no point that was an option.Vaal needed to be prevented from destroying the Enterprise or harming Federation citizens. But once it was possible for Kirk and his crew to escape, they should have done so and leave the Vaalians alone. Alien cultures have a right to sovereignty and Kirk had no right to impose his culture's values on them.
I for one like a Starfleet willing to get that dark.
Treks never been afraid of going "dark", so why should it start now?No thanks: I get enough of that from nearly every other sci-fi show, plus, y'know, real life.
Indeed. I didn't grow up with fairy tale escapism in my TOS always. It was sometimes dark and tragic. I don't want Trek to shy away from it.Treks never been afraid of going "dark", so why should it start now?
You and I obviously failed escapism 101No interstellar organization like Starfleet or the Federation comprised of species that just a few generations or even decades earlier were engaged in warfare with other races is going to suddenly embrace clean, smooth behavior like not threatening other worlds with devastating retaliation or never firing first. In a galaxy with enemies like the Klingons, Romulans and Borg being the nice guy who never bends the rules or acts in a morally questionable way is not the route to success and long-term survival.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.